Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc.green2 sentences2016See Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc., 898 S.W.2d 89, 93 (Mo.banc 1995) (holding that, pursuant to § 1.205, a wrongful death claim under § 537.080 may be stated for a nonviable unborn child); State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345, 350 (Mo.banc 1992) (holding that the provisions of § 1.205—that unborn children are to be considered living human beings, and that they are to receive the same rights as other Missourians, subject to the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent—make unborn children persons for purposes of the involuntary manslaughter statute); State v. Rollen, 133 S.W.3d 57, 63 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003) 2003The court answered that question in Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc., 898 S.W.2d 89, 92 (Mo. banc 1995) when it held that a nonviable unborn child is a “person” capable of supporting a claim for wrongful death pursuant to Section 537.080. | 2 | 2 |
Houston v. Weismangreen1 sentence2019"If a party does not support contentions with relevant authority or argument beyond conclusory statements, the point is deemed abandoned." Kuenz v. Walker, 244 S.W.3d 191, 194 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) (citing Houston v. Weisman, 197 S.W.3d 204, 206 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006)). 13 The circuit court did not err in finding that, even if declared to be equitable adoptive parents of DeBrodie, the Martins had no right to bring a wrongful death claim under section 537.080. | 1 | 1 |
Kuenz v. Walkergreen1 sentence2019"If a party does not support contentions with relevant authority or argument beyond conclusory statements, the point is deemed abandoned." Kuenz v. Walker, 244 S.W.3d 191, 194 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) (citing Houston v. Weisman, 197 S.W.3d 204, 206 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006)). 13 The circuit court did not err in finding that, even if declared to be equitable adoptive parents of DeBrodie, the Martins had no right to bring a wrongful death claim under section 537.080. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rollengreen1 sentence2016See Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc., 898 S.W.2d 89, 93 (Mo.banc 1995) (holding that, pursuant to § 1.205, a wrongful death claim under § 537.080 may be stated for a nonviable unborn child); State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345, 350 (Mo.banc 1992) (holding that the provisions of § 1.205—that unborn children are to be considered living human beings, and that they are to receive the same rights as other Missourians, subject to the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent—make unborn children persons for purposes of the involuntary manslaughter statute); State v. Rollen, 133 S.W.3d 57, 63 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003) | 1 | 1 |
State v. Knappgreen1 sentence2016See Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc., 898 S.W.2d 89, 93 (Mo.banc 1995) (holding that, pursuant to § 1.205, a wrongful death claim under § 537.080 may be stated for a nonviable unborn child); State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345, 350 (Mo.banc 1992) (holding that the provisions of § 1.205—that unborn children are to be considered living human beings, and that they are to receive the same rights as other Missourians, subject to the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent—make unborn children persons for purposes of the involuntary manslaughter statute); State v. Rollen, 133 S.W.3d 57, 63 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003) | 1 | 1 |
State v. Holcombgreen1 sentence2016See Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc., 898 S.W.2d 89, 93 (Mo.banc 1995) (holding that, pursuant to § 1.205, a wrongful death claim under § 537.080 may be stated for a nonviable unborn child); State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345, 350 (Mo.banc 1992) (holding that the provisions of § 1.205—that unborn children are to be considered living human beings, and that they are to receive the same rights as other Missourians, subject to the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent—make unborn children persons for purposes of the involuntary manslaughter statute); State v. Rollen, 133 S.W.3d 57, 63 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003) | 1 | 1 |
Crain v. Webster Electric Cooperativegreen1 sentence1980Cooperative, 568 S.W.2d 781, 787 [4, 5] (Mo.App.1978), where a father sought to maintain a wrongful death action under § 537.080, for the death of his minor son, who was employed by Frazier Brothers, Inc., which was in the business of constructing and rebuilding power lines, not ordinarily working on electric lines which were “hot” or energized. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wollen v. DePaul Health Center
green
1 sentence2010Specifically, Appellant filed an action for “lost chance of survival” pursuant to Wollen v. DePaul Health Center, 828 S.W.2d 681 (Mo. banc 1992), and for wrongful death pursuant to Section 537.080. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Sullivan v. Carlisle
green
1 sentence2004Id. at 92 . 6 Likewise, in Holt v. Burlington Northern R.R. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Lumley v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence1988The disposition of this case is controlled by Lumley v. Farmers Insurance Company, 716 S.W.2d 455 (Mo.App.1986). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.