Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ashbaughgreen1 sentence2016See, e.g., State v. Ashbaugh, 349 Or 297, 308-09 , 244 P3d 365 (2010) (“arrests” are “restraints on an individual’s liberty that are steps toward charging individuals with a crime”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rodgersgreen2 sentences2013See State v. Rodgers/Kirkeby, 347 Or 610, 623-24 , 227 P3d 695 (2010). 2013See State v. Rodgers/Kirkeby, 347 Or 610, 623-24 , 227 P3d 695 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Vondehngreen2 sentences2008Olson, 287 Or at 166 ; accord State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 (2008) (giving of Miranda warnings insufficient to break causal relationship between earlier Miranda violation under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the defendant’s post- Miranda statements). 2008Olson, 287 Or at 166 ; accord State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 (2008) (giving of Miranda warnings insufficient to break causal relationship between earlier Miranda violation under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the defendant’s post- Miranda statements). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2005See State v. Sargent, 323 Or 455, 462-63 , 918 P2d 819 (1996) (evidence not subject to suppression under Article I, section 9, if no causal connection between evidence sought to be suppressed and unlawful police conduct); Rodriguez, 317 Or at 39 (same). 2005See State v. Sargent, 323 Or. 455, 462-63 , 918 P.2d 819 (1996) (evidence not subject to suppression under Article I, section 9, if no causal connection between evidence sought to be suppressed and unlawful police conduct); *921 Rodriguez, 317 Or. at 39 , 854 P.2d 399 (same). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sargentgreen2 sentences2005See State v. Sargent, 323 Or 455, 462-63 , 918 P2d 819 (1996) (evidence not subject to suppression under Article I, section 9, if no causal connection between evidence sought to be suppressed and unlawful police conduct); Rodriguez, 317 Or at 39 (same). 2005See State v. Sargent, 323 Or 455, 462-63 , 918 P2d 819 (1996) (evidence not subject to suppression under Article I, section 9, if no causal connection between evidence sought to be suppressed and unlawful police conduct); Rodriguez, 317 Or at 39 (same). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hall
red
2 sentences2010If the officers’ arrest was unlawful, evidence that they discovered because of the unlawful arrest is subject to suppression under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. 2 State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 25 , 115 P3d 908 (2005). 2010If the officers’ arrest was unlawful, evidence that they discovered because of the unlawful arrest is subject to suppression under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. 2 State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 25 , 115 P3d 908 (2005). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Olson
green
1 sentence2008Olson, 287 Or at 166 ; accord State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 (2008) (giving of Miranda warnings insufficient to break causal relationship between earlier Miranda violation under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the defendant’s post- Miranda statements). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Elkins v. United States
green
2 sentences1992Elkins v. United States, 364 US 206 , 80 S Ct 1437 , 4 L Ed 2d 1669 (1960). 1992Elkins v. United States, 364 US 206 , 80 S Ct 1437 , 4 L Ed 2d 1669 (1960). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Kell
green
2 sentences1992In the trial court, defendant sought to suppress those two statements, as well as certain statements that he made about cocaine trafficking while en route from Mississippi to Oregon. 2 THE EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECT OF ARTICLE I, SECTION 9 The first issue in this case is whether the lawfulness of the arrest in Mississippi is subject to scrutiny under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. 3 This court has never squarely addressed whether the protections of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution apply in an Oregon prosecution that seeks to rely on evidence obtained as a result 1992In the trial court, defendant sought to suppress those two statements, as well as certain statements that he made about cocaine trafficking while en route from Mississippi to Oregon. 2 THE EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECT OF ARTICLE I, SECTION 9 The first issue in this case is whether the lawfulness of the arrest in Mississippi is subject to scrutiny under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. 3 This court has never squarely addressed whether the protections of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution apply in an Oregon prosecution that seeks to rely on evidence obtained as a result | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Potlatch Forests, Inc. v. International Woodworkers
green
1 sentence1955Cross & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 174 F2d 875, Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 170 F2d 247, and Potlatch Forests, Inc. v. International Woodworkers of America, 108 F Supp 906 (affirmed in Olsen v. Potlatch Forests, Inc., 200 F2d 700) hold that group insurance programs which are employer paid are valid and bind all employees. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.