Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Crawford v. State, 294 Ga. 898, 901-902 ( 757 SE2d 102 ) (2014) (phone records that provide circumstantial evidence of the crimes sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony). 2017Crawford v. State, 294 Ga. 898, 901-902 ( 757 SE2d 102 ) (2014) (phone records that provide circumstantial evidence of the crimes sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony). | 2 | 2 |
Huff v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Golden v. State, 310 Ga. 538, 541 (1) (852 SE2d 524) (2020) (considering evidence that defendant left the state soon after the crime as evidence he was guilty of felony murder); Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807, 809 (1) (796 SE2d 688) (2017) (“[E]vidence of the defendant’s conduct before and after the crime was committed may give rise to an inference that he participated in the crime.” (citation and punctuation omitted)); Head, 316 Ga. at 413-415 (applying rule that testimony of a second accomplice is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony to allow possible accomplices’ statements t 2025See Golden v. State, 310 Ga. 538, 541 (1) (852 SE2d 524) (2020) (considering evidence that defendant left the state soon after the crime as evidence he was guilty of felony murder); Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807, 809 (1) (796 SE2d 688) (2017) (“[E]vidence of the defendant’s conduct before and after the crime was committed may give rise to an inference that he participated in the crime.” (citation and punctuation omitted)); Head, 316 Ga. at 413-415 (applying rule that testimony of a second accomplice is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony to allow possible accomplices’ statements t | 1 | 1 |
Golden v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Golden v. State, 310 Ga. 538, 541 (1) (852 SE2d 524) (2020) (considering evidence that defendant left the state soon after the crime as evidence he was guilty of felony murder); Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807, 809 (1) (796 SE2d 688) (2017) (“[E]vidence of the defendant’s conduct before and after the crime was committed may give rise to an inference that he participated in the crime.” (citation and punctuation omitted)); Head, 316 Ga. at 413-415 (applying rule that testimony of a second accomplice is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony to allow possible accomplices’ statements t 2025See Golden v. State, 310 Ga. 538, 541 (1) (852 SE2d 524) (2020) (considering evidence that defendant left the state soon after the crime as evidence he was guilty of felony murder); Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807, 809 (1) (796 SE2d 688) (2017) (“[E]vidence of the defendant’s conduct before and after the crime was committed may give rise to an inference that he participated in the crime.” (citation and punctuation omitted)); Head, 316 Ga. at 413-415 (applying rule that testimony of a second accomplice is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony to allow possible accomplices’ statements t | 1 | 1 |
Head v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Golden v. State, 310 Ga. 538, 541 (1) (852 SE2d 524) (2020) (considering evidence that defendant left the state soon after the crime as evidence he was guilty of felony murder); Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807, 809 (1) (796 SE2d 688) (2017) (“[E]vidence of the defendant’s conduct before and after the crime was committed may give rise to an inference that he participated in the crime.” (citation and punctuation omitted)); Head, 316 Ga. at 413-415 (applying rule that testimony of a second accomplice is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony to allow possible accomplices’ statements t 2025See Golden v. State, 310 Ga. 538, 541 (1) ( 852 SE2d 524 ) (2020) (considering evidence that defendant left the state soon after the crime as evidence he was guilty of felony murder); Huff v. State, 300 Ga. 807, 809 (1) ( 796 SE2d 688 ) (2017) (“[E]vidence of the defendant’s conduct before and after the crime was committed may give rise to an inference that he participated in the crime.” (citation and punctuation omitted)); Head, 316 Ga. at 413-415 (2) (b) (applying rule that testimony of a second accomplice is sufficient to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony to allow possible accomplices’ | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Jackson, 314 Ga. 751, 755 (1). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2018When reviewing the denial of a motion for directed verdict of acquittal, we apply the same standard used to evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a guilty verdict under Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). 2018When reviewing the denial of a motion for directed verdict of acquittal, we apply the same standard used to evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a guilty verdict under Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.