Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Van Hoffgreen2 sentences2019State v. Van Hoff, 415 N.W.2d 647, 648 (Iowa 1987). 2018See State v. Van Hoff, 415 N.W.2d 647, 648 (Iowa 1987). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Janz
green
2 sentences2020Where section 814.6(1)(a) granted a criminal defendant the right of a direct appeal from “[a] final judgment of sentence,” and section 910.2 contemplated that restitution orders would be part of a judgment of conviction, we held that the “defendant’s appeal from the final judgment was also a permissible appeal from all orders incorporated in that sentence, including the order of restitution here challenged.” Id. (alteration in original) (first quoting Iowa Code § 814.6 (1)(a) (1983)). 2020Where section 814.6(1)(a) granted a criminal defendant the right of a direct appeal from “[a] final judgment of sentence,” and section 910.2 contemplated that restitution orders would be part of a judgment of conviction, we held that the “defendant’s appeal from the final judgment was also a permissible appeal from all orders incorporated in that sentence, including the order of restitution here challenged.” Id. (alteration in original) (first quoting Iowa Code § 814.6 (1)(a) (1983)). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.