Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Yodergreen2 sentences1987State v. Yoder, 96 Idaho 651 , 534 P.2d 771 (1975) (upholding provisions of I.C.R. 41(c) allowing oral recorded testimony for issuance of search warrant even though I.C. § 19-4404 mandated “depositions in writing”); State v. Lindner, 100 Idaho 37 , 592 P.2d 852 (1979) (holding that less restrictive provisions of I.C.R. 41(c) for issuing nighttime search warrants controlled over more restrictive provisions of I.C. § 19-4411); State v. Lewis, 107 Idaho 616 , 691 P.2d 1231 (1984) (adhering to Lindner’s ruling “that I.C.R. 41 would control to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411”). 1987State v. Yoder, 96 Idaho 651 , 534 P.2d 771 (1975) (upholding provisions of I.C.R. 41(c) allowing oral recorded testimony for issuance of search warrant even though I.C. § 19-4404 mandated “depositions in writing”); State v. Lindner, 100 Idaho 37 , 592 P.2d 852 (1979) (holding that less restrictive provisions of I.C.R. 41(c) for issuing nighttime search warrants controlled over more restrictive provisions of I.C. § 19-4411); State v. Lewis, 107 Idaho 616 , 691 P.2d 1231 (1984) (adhering to Lindner’s ruling “that I.C.R. 41 would control to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411”). | 3 | 4 |
State v. Holmangreen2 sentences2022This rule is the correct standard for analyzing search warrants authorizing nighttime execution, “to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411.” Lewis, 107 Idaho at 619 , 691 P.2d at 1234 ; State v. Holman, 109 Idaho 382, 387 , 707 P.2d 493, 498 (Ct. App. 1985). 2022This rule is the correct standard for analyzing search warrants authorizing nighttime execution, “to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411.” Lewis, 107 Idaho at 619 , 691 P.2d at 1234 ; State v. Holman, 109 Idaho 382, 387 , 707 P.2d 493, 498 (Ct. App. 1985). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lewis
green
2 sentences2022This rule is the correct standard for analyzing search warrants authorizing nighttime execution, “to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411.” Lewis, 107 Idaho at 619 , 691 P.2d at 1234 ; State v. Holman, 109 Idaho 382, 387 , 707 P.2d 493, 498 (Ct. App. 1985). 2022This rule is the correct standard for analyzing search warrants authorizing nighttime execution, “to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411.” Lewis, 107 Idaho at 619 , 691 P.2d at 1234 ; State v. Holman, 109 Idaho 382, 387 , 707 P.2d 493, 498 (Ct. App. 1985). | 3 | 1987–2022 |
State v. Lindner
green
2 sentences2010However, relying on Yoder , the Court stated in a footnote that, “although it is not necessary to our decision, we are persuaded that the rationale of Yoder would necessarily lead to the conclusion that I.C.R. 41 would control to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411.” Lindner, 100 Idaho at 42 n. 5, 592 P.2d at 857 n. 5. 2010However, relying on Yoder , the Court stated in a footnote that, “although it is not necessary to our decision, we are persuaded that the rationale of Yoder would necessarily lead to the conclusion that I.C.R. 41 would control to the exclusion of I.C. § 19-4411.” Lindner, 100 Idaho at 42 n. 5, 592 P.2d at 857 n. 5. | 3 | 1984–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.