Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
35 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coleman v. Denogreen2 sentences2026In Coleman, the supreme court held that, although EMTALA claims and medical malpractice claims often overlap, “Coleman’s claim of ‘dumping’— improper transfer—is one of malpractice governed by the MMA.” Id. at 315 . 2021Coleman factors In Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517 (La. 1/25/02), 813 So.2d 303, 315-316 , the Louisiana Supreme Court identified the following factors to be considered when 3 determining whether the conduct of a qualified health care provider constitutes “malpractice” as defined under the LMMA: [1] whether the particular wrong is ‘treatment related’ or caused by a dereliction of professional skill, [2] whether the wrong requires expert medical evidence to determine whether the appropriate standard of care was breached, [3] whether the pertinent act or omission involved assessment of the patient's co | 1 | 8 |
Blevins v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc.green2 sentences2025Ctr., Inc., 07-127 (La. 6/29/07), 959 So. 2d 440 ; Coleman, supra. Thus, we find the district court did not err in analyzing the record under the Coleman factors to determine whether plaintiff’s allegations sound in medical malpractice or general negligence. 10 In Billeaudeau, supra, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging, inter alia, their daughter’s injuries were caused by the hospital’s failure to properly credential an emergency room physician, who was employed as an independent contractor. 2012Applying the Coleman factors, the supreme court concluded that these complaints alleged general negligence, “as the wrongs alleged are not integral to the rendering of care and treatment by the health care provider to the patient in this case.” Blevins, 959 So.2d at 447 . | 1 | 4 |
Williamson v. HOSPITAL SERVICE OF JEFFERSONgreen2 sentences2023Id. at 786-787. 2023Id. at 786-787. | 1 | 3 |
Watson v. Woldenberg Village, Inc.green2 sentences2023Whether the injury would have occurred if the patient had not sought treatment This Court has found this factor “inapplicable … in a nursing home context” where “the injury occurred not during the course of treatment delivery, but during [plaintiff’s] custodial care in the home.” Watson, 16-0159, p. 10, 203 So.3d at 324 . 2023Whether the injury would have occurred if the patient had not sought treatment This Court has found this factor “inapplicable … in a nursing home context” where “the injury occurred not during the course of treatment delivery, but during [plaintiff’s] custodial care in the home.” Watson, 16-0159, p. 10, 203 So.3d at 324 . | 1 | 2 |
Andrews v. Our Lady of the Lake Ascension Community Hospital, Inc.green2 sentences2023See Andrews, 142 So. 3d at 39 n.3. 12 administered to Mrs. Villanueva, as a result of the treatment she received at AVALA. " Malpractice" as set forth in La. 2023See Andrews, 142 So. 3d at 39 n.3. 12 administered to Mrs. Villanueva, as a result of the treatment she received at AVALA. " Malpractice" as set forth in La. | 1 | 1 |
Price v. City of Bossier Citygreen2 sentences2011See Blevins, 959 So.2d 440 (analyzing the Coleman factors and finding that certain claims for injuries from an improperly secured hospital bed fell under general tort law and not medical malpractice, in part, because they did not arise in the context of a physician/patient relationship or within the scope of activities the hospital is licensed to perform); Price v. City of Bossier City, 96-2408 (La.5/20/97), 693 So.2d 1169, 1173 (an employer-mandated drug screen given to an employee who was treated for a non-drug related work injury was not given in the course of medical treatment as the emplo 2011See Blevins, 959 So.2d 440 (analyzing the Coleman factors and finding that certain claims for injuries from an improperly secured hospital bed fell under general tort law and not medical malpractice, in part, because they did not arise in the context of a physician/patient relationship or within the scope of activities the hospital is licensed to perform); Price v. City of Bossier City, 96-2408 (La.5/20/97), 693 So.2d 1169, 1173 (an employer-mandated drug screen given to an employee who was treated for a non-drug related work injury was not given in the course of medical treatment as the emplo | 1 | 1 |
McLemore v. WESTWOOD MANOR NURS. AND REHAB.green2 sentences2011See McLemore v. Westwood Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 37,450 (La.App. 2 Cir. 8/20/03), 852 So.2d 1170 (After a nursing home resident was allegedly dropped by staff and then was not treated for injuries sustained as a result of the fall, the claimant filed suit. 2011See McLemore v. Westwood Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 37,450 (La.App. 2 Cir. 8/20/03), 852 So.2d 1170 (After a nursing home resident was allegedly dropped by staff and then was not treated for injuries sustained as a result of the fall, the claimant filed suit. | 1 | 1 |
Quinney v. Summit of Alexandriagreen2 sentences2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . 2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp.
green
2 sentences2016In LaCoste , the Court recognized, however, that despite the necessity of the patient entering the facility, “many claims of medical malpractice resulting from omissions might not qualify as medical malpractice if this factor were applied singly and without relation to the other Coleman factors, because an omission, such as a failure to diagnose, ostensibly leaves a patient in the same position as she would have been in had she never sought treatment in the first place.” Id. 2016In LaCoste , the Court recognized, however, that despite the necessity of the patient entering the facility, “many claims of medical malpractice resulting from omissions might not qualify as medical malpractice if this factor were applied singly and without relation to the other Coleman factors, because an omission, such as a failure to diagnose, ostensibly leaves a patient in the same position as she would have been in had she never sought treatment in the first place.” Id. | 4 | 2010–2016 |
Brandi Billeaudeau, Veronica Billeaudeau, and Joseph Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority, Dr. Kondilo Skirlis-Zavala, and the Shumacher Group of Louisiana, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018In its application of the Coleman factors, the Billeaudeau court noted that whether a particular wrong should be considered inherently "treatment-related" is a factor that can be artfully argued either way, see Bonilla, 210 So.3d at 550 (citing on Billeaudeau, 218 So.3d at 523 ), but ultimately concluded that the decision to hire a physician in and of itself is administrative and does not directly relate to the treatment of any given patient or involve a dereliction of professional skill. 2018In its application of the Coleman factors, the Billeaudeau court noted that whether a particular wrong should be considered inherently "treatment-related" is a factor that can be artfully argued either way, see Bonilla, 210 So.3d at 550 (citing on Billeaudeau, 218 So.3d at 523 ), but ultimately concluded that the decision to hire a physician in and of itself is administrative and does not directly relate to the treatment of any given patient or involve a dereliction of professional skill. | 3 | 2018–2025 |
Bonilla v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District 2
green
2 sentences2018In its application of the Coleman factors, the Billeaudeau court noted that whether a particular wrong should be considered inherently "treatment-related" is a factor that can be artfully argued either way, see Bonilla, 210 So.3d at 550 (citing on Billeaudeau, 218 So.3d at 523 ), but ultimately concluded that the decision to hire a physician in and of itself is administrative and does not directly relate to the treatment of any given patient or involve a dereliction of professional skill. 2018In its application of the Coleman factors, the Billeaudeau court noted that whether a particular wrong should be considered inherently "treatment-related" is a factor that can be artfully argued either way, see Bonilla, 210 So.3d at 550 (citing on Billeaudeau, 218 So.3d at 523 ), but ultimately concluded that the decision to hire a physician in and of itself is administrative and does not directly relate to the treatment of any given patient or involve a dereliction of professional skill. | 3 | 2018–2021 |
Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care Centers
green
2 sentences2010Richard, 835 So.2d at 469 . 2010Richard, 835 So.2d at 469 . | 3 | 2003–2010 |
Campbell v. Nexion Health at Claiborne, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2024Id. 2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2016In Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc., 10-348 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/6/10) , 47 So.3d 17 , writ denied, 10-2520 (La.1/14/11), 52 So.3d 904 , this court engaged in an exhaustive examination of each of the Coleman factors to determine whether a claim for “negligent credentialing”' constituted a malpractice claim. 2016In Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc., 10-348 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/6/10) , 47 So.3d 17 , writ denied, 10-2520 (La.1/14/11), 52 So.3d 904 , this court engaged in an exhaustive examination of each of the Coleman factors to determine whether a claim for “negligent credentialing”' constituted a malpractice claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Lyncher v. Design Engineering, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2016In Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc., 10-348 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/6/10) , 47 So.3d 17 , writ denied, 10-2520 (La.1/14/11), 52 So.3d 904 , this court engaged in an exhaustive examination of each of the Coleman factors to determine whether a claim for “negligent credentialing”' constituted a malpractice claim. 2016In Plaisance v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc., 10-348 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/6/10) , 47 So.3d 17 , writ denied, 10-2520 (La.1/14/11), 52 So.3d 904 , this court engaged in an exhaustive examination of each of the Coleman factors to determine whether a claim for “negligent credentialing”' constituted a malpractice claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority
neutral
2 sentences2016App. 3 Cir. 4/6/16), 189 So.3d 561 . 7 While its analysis of the Coleman factors differed slightly from that of the lower court, the Court of Appeal nevertheless found the claim for negligent credentialing was not a claim of malpractice under the LMMA under the Coleman framework. 2016App. 3 Cir. 4/6/16), 189 So.3d 561 . 7 While its analysis of the Coleman factors differed slightly from that of the lower court, the Court of Appeal nevertheless found the claim for negligent credentialing was not a claim of malpractice under the LMMA under the Coleman framework. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc.
green
2 sentences2012Plaintiffs rely heavily on two Louisiana cases which apply the Coleman factors and conclude that similar injuries inflicted in a medical facility fall outside the scope of the LMMA. |7In Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc., 01-498 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/25/02) , 829 So.2d 479, 496 , writs denied, 02-2653 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 348 and 02-2646 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 345 , a nursing home was held liable based on negligent supervision of staff for an attack by one resident on another under general tort principles. 2012Plaintiffs rely heavily on two Louisiana cases which apply the Coleman factors and conclude that similar injuries inflicted in a medical facility fall outside the scope of the LMMA. |7In Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc., 01-498 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/25/02) , 829 So.2d 479, 496 , writs denied, 02-2653 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 348 and 02-2646 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 345 , a nursing home was held liable based on negligent supervision of staff for an attack by one resident on another under general tort principles. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Clark v. Matthews
neutral
2 sentences2012Plaintiffs rely heavily on two Louisiana cases which apply the Coleman factors and conclude that similar injuries inflicted in a medical facility fall outside the scope of the LMMA. |7In Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc., 01-498 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/25/02) , 829 So.2d 479, 496 , writs denied, 02-2653 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 348 and 02-2646 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 345 , a nursing home was held liable based on negligent supervision of staff for an attack by one resident on another under general tort principles. 2012Plaintiffs rely heavily on two Louisiana cases which apply the Coleman factors and conclude that similar injuries inflicted in a medical facility fall outside the scope of the LMMA. |7In Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc., 01-498 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/25/02) , 829 So.2d 479, 496 , writs denied, 02-2653 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 348 and 02-2646 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 345 , a nursing home was held liable based on negligent supervision of staff for an attack by one resident on another under general tort principles. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2012Plaintiffs rely heavily on two Louisiana cases which apply the Coleman factors and conclude that similar injuries inflicted in a medical facility fall outside the scope of the LMMA. |7In Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc., 01-498 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/25/02) , 829 So.2d 479, 496 , writs denied, 02-2653 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 348 and 02-2646 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 345 , a nursing home was held liable based on negligent supervision of staff for an attack by one resident on another under general tort principles. 2012Plaintiffs rely heavily on two Louisiana cases which apply the Coleman factors and conclude that similar injuries inflicted in a medical facility fall outside the scope of the LMMA. |7In Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc., 01-498 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/25/02) , 829 So.2d 479, 496 , writs denied, 02-2653 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 348 and 02-2646 (La.12/19/02), 833 So.2d 345 , a nursing home was held liable based on negligent supervision of staff for an attack by one resident on another under general tort principles. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Jordan v. STONEBRIDGE
green
1 sentence2012Although we find that all Coleman factors have been satisfied in this case, Mrs. Matherne relies on this Court’s decision in Jordan v. Stonebridge, 03-0588 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/25/03) , 862 So.2d 181 , to argue that her claim does not fall within the statutory definition of medical malpractice. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Delcambre v. Blood Systems, Inc.
green
1 sentence2011The supreme court examined who constitutes a patient in this context in Delcambre, 893 So.2d 23 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Hernandez v. Diversified Healthcare-Abbeville, LLC
green
2 sentences2010The defendant nursing home excepted on the grounds of prematurity, and after considering the Coleman factors, the appellate court found that the petition's "phraseology does not circumvent the requirement that the claim must be first submitted to the medical review panel." Id., 09-546 at p. 4, 24 So.3d at 287 . 2010The defendant nursing home excepted on the grounds of prematurity, and after considering the Coleman factors, the appellate court found that the petition's "phraseology does not circumvent the requirement that the claim must be first submitted to the medical review panel." Id., 09-546 at p. 4, 24 So.3d at 287 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Jackson v. DeSOTO RETIREMENT AND REHAB.
green
2 sentences2007Williamson, 888 So.2d at 789-790 . *453 Finally, in Jackson v. DeSoto Retirement and Rehabilitation Center Inc., 40,482 (La.App. 2nd Cir.12/14/05), 917 So.2d 727, 728-729 , a nursing home resident allegedly fell or was dropped, resulting in a fractured hip and complications which allegedly led to his death. 2007Williamson, 888 So.2d at 789-790 . *453 Finally, in Jackson v. DeSoto Retirement and Rehabilitation Center Inc., 40,482 (La.App. 2nd Cir.12/14/05), 917 So.2d 727, 728-729 , a nursing home resident allegedly fell or was dropped, resulting in a fractured hip and complications which allegedly led to his death. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
McKnight v. D & W HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
green
2 sentences2007Williamson, 888 So.2d at 790-791 . [5] We note that in a case factually distinguishable from the present case, this court in McKnight v. D & W Health Services, Inc., 2002-2552 (La.App. 1st Cir.11/7/03), 873 So.2d 18, 20 , addressed whether the death of a nursing home resident who was allowed to wander off the premises and died as a result of injury, heat exhaustion and exposure, constituted a claim for malpractice under the MMA. 2007Williamson, 888 So.2d at 790-791 . [5] We note that in a case factually distinguishable from the present case, this court in McKnight v. D & W Health Services, Inc., 2002-2552 (La.App. 1st Cir.11/7/03), 873 So.2d 18, 20 , addressed whether the death of a nursing home resident who was allowed to wander off the premises and died as a result of injury, heat exhaustion and exposure, constituted a claim for malpractice under the MMA. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Pender v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp.
green
2 sentences2007Pender, 844 So.2d at 1110 . 2007Pender, 844 So.2d at 1110 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Furlow v. Woodlawn Manor, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006Accordingly, we will limit our analysis to whether the alleged acts of negligence in failing to timely clean and change Ms. Allen on a regular, timely basis constitute medical malpractice. [4] See Furlow, 39,485 at p. 6, 900 So.2d at 340 . *558 Applying the Coleman factors set forth above, we conclude, as have the Second and Third Circuits in addressing this precise issue, that the trial court erred in finding that the alleged acts of failing to timely clean and change Ms. Allen on a regular basis constitute medical malpractice and, thus, were subject to the requirements of the MMA. 2006Accordingly, we will limit our analysis to whether the alleged acts of negligence in failing to timely clean and change Ms. Allen on a regular, timely basis constitute medical malpractice. [4] See Furlow, 39,485 at p. 6, 900 So.2d at 340 . *558 Applying the Coleman factors set forth above, we conclude, as have the Second and Third Circuits in addressing this precise issue, that the trial court erred in finding that the alleged acts of failing to timely clean and change Ms. Allen on a regular basis constitute medical malpractice and, thus, were subject to the requirements of the MMA. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Burks v. Christus Health Monroe
green
2 sentences2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . 2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Henry v. West Monroe Guest House, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . 2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Womack v. AUTUMN LEAVES NURS. & REHAB. CEN.
neutral
2 sentences2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . 2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Rogers v. HICKORY MANOR NURSING & REHABIL.
neutral
2 sentences2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . 2006See Quinney v. Summit of Alexandria, 2005-237, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3rd Cir.6/1/05), 903 So.2d 1226, 1233-1234 ; Rogers v. Hickory Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation, L.L.C., 39,626, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1150, 1153-1154 ; Womack v. Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C., 39,710, p. 5 (La.App. 2nd Cir.5/11/05), 902 So.2d 1280, 1283 ; Furlow , 39,485 at pp. 7-8, 900 So.2d at 340 ; Burks , 39,540 at pp. 5-6, 899 So.2d at 779 ; and Henry, 39,442, 895 So.2d at 683 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Sewell v. Doctors Hosp. green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| State v. Maduell green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State v. Williams green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Fid. & Dep. Co. of Md. v. Cloy Const. Co. green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Breithaupt v. Sellers green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.