Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beck v. Steppred2 sentences2000Based on language this court used in Beck v. Stepp , 144 Ill. 2d 232, 241 (1991) and Andersen v. Resource Economics Corp. , 133 Ill. 2d 342, 347 (1990), various appellate court decisions have held that motions filed under section 2–1203 are required to specify the grounds warranting the relief requested. 2000Based on language this court used in Beck v. Stepp, 144 Ill. 2d 232, 241 (1991) and Andersen v. Resource Economics Corp., 133 Ill. 2d 342, 347 (1990), various appellate court decisions have held that motions filed under section 2 — 1203 are required to specify the grounds warranting the relief requested. | 3 | 3 |
Lewis v. Loyola University of Chicagogreen1 sentence2003See Lewis v. Loyola University, 149 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
AMERICAN NAT. BANK AND TRUST v. Busgreen1 sentence1992Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church (1990), 138 Ill. 2d 458, 461-64 ; see also American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bus (1991), 212 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Andersen v. Resource Economics Corp.
green
2 sentences2000Based on language this court used in Beck v. Stepp , 144 Ill. 2d 232, 241 (1991) and Andersen v. Resource Economics Corp. , 133 Ill. 2d 342, 347 (1990), various appellate court decisions have held that motions filed under section 2–1203 are required to specify the grounds warranting the relief requested. 2000Based on language this court used in Beck v. Stepp, 144 Ill. 2d 232, 241 (1991) and Andersen v. Resource Economics Corp., 133 Ill. 2d 342, 347 (1990), various appellate court decisions have held that motions filed under section 2 — 1203 are required to specify the grounds warranting the relief requested. | 3 | 1999–2000 |
Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church
green
1 sentence1992Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church (1990), 138 Ill. 2d 458, 461-64 ; see also American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bus (1991), 212 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Wool v. La Salle National Bank
green
1 sentence1986App. 3d 560, 568 , 411 N.E.2d 1135, 1142 .) Logically, then, the stay provision of Rule 303(a), provided by filing of a timely post-trial motion pursuant to section 2 — 1203, should also be available for an appeal filed under Rule 304(a). | 1 | 1986–1986 |