but-for causation standard (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

but-for causation standard in Michigan

6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2022–2026 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Bostock v. Clayton Countygreen
scotus · 2020 · cited in 3 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022See id.

2022See id.

33
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightsgreen
mich · 2022 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2025–2026
2 sentences

2026See Rouch World, LLC v Dep’t of Civil Rights, 510 Mich 398 , 420; 987 NW2d 501 (2022) (“This Court has previously held that the operative phrase ‘because of’ in the ELCRA establishes a but-for causation standard. . . .

2026See Rouch World, LLC v Dep’t of Civil Rights, 510 Mich 398 , 420; 987 NW2d 501 (2022) (“This Court has previously held that the operative phrase ‘because of’ in the ELCRA establishes a but-for causation standard. . . .

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, Inc green
mich · 2016
2 sentences

2022Hecht v Nat’l Heritage Academies, Inc, 499 Mich 586, 606 ; 886 NW2d 135 (2016).

2022Hecht v Nat’l Heritage Academies, Inc, 499 Mich 586, 606 ; 886 NW2d 135 (2016).

32022–2022
Robinson v. City of Detroit green
mich · 2000
1 sentence

2024Id.

12024–2024

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2101 (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2202 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 141.1361 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.243 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 16.577 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.257a (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2102 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2201 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2301 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.158 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.335a (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.3a (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 32 (1997–2026) MI 6 (2022–2026) MD 4 (2013–2024) DC 3 (2020–2024) NM 3 (2021–2025) NV 3 (2010–2020) IA 3 (2014–2017) WA 3 (2011–2020) OH 3 (2013–2020) UT 2 (2015–2017) MN 2 (2011–2016) CO 2 (2011–2020) CT 2 (2019–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check