satisfied requirement (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

satisfied requirement in Michigan

6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Dillardred
michctapp · 2013 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018See Barrera, 500 Mich at 21-22.

2018See Barrera, 500 Mich at 21-22.

22
People v. Smithgreen
mich · 2008 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See also my dissent in People v Smith, 482 Mich 292, 325-329 (2008).

2009See also my dissent in People v. Smith, 482 Mich. 292, 325-329 , 754 N.W.2d 284 (2008).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Willing green
michctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2019Willing, 267 Mich App at 220 .

12019–2019
People v. Babcock green
mich · 2003
1 sentence

2006Applying the analysis of my partial dissent and partial concurrence in People v. Babcock, supra, at 280-284 , 666 N.W.2d 231 , I would find that the trial court satisfied the requirement for "a substantial and compelling reason" for its departure from the sentencing guidelines, and its decision did not venture beyond the range of principled outcomes under the circumstances.

12006–2006
Thomas v. Michigan Mutual Insurance green
michctapp · 1984
2 sentences

1993The facts in our present case are substantially similar to that in Thomas, supra, in that one attorney communicated to the other that its offer" was accepted.

1993The facts in our present case are substantially similar to that in Thomas, supra, in that one attorney communicated to the other that its offer was accepted.

11993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.34 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 7 (1947–2023) IL 7 (1920–2024) OH 6 (1990–2025) MI 6 (1993–2019) FL 5 (2020–2026) CA 5 (2005–2024) WA 5 (1926–2015) WI 5 (1991–2013) IN 4 (1972–2014) TX 4 (1933–2011) AL 4 (1988–2024) NC 3 (2018–2021) KS 3 (1912–2024) MO 2 (1989–2001) TN 2 (2013–2015) GA 2 (1981–2010) UT 2 (1989–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check