section 302.500 suspension (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

section 302.500 suspension in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2000 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Mayogreen
mo · 1996 · cited in 5 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996The Supreme Court held that “the sanction of license revocation or suspension under Section 302.500, et seq., is not punishment for the purpose of the Double Jeopardy Clause.” Id. at 763 .

1996Under almost identical facts, the Missouri Supreme Court in State v. Mayo, 915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996), determined that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar a driving-while-intoxicated prosecution after a revocation or suspension under § 302.500, et seq.

25

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Stahl v. Director of Revenue green
moctapp · 1999
1 sentence

2000Id.

12000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 302.500 (6) MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.010 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check