section 1 right to privacy (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

section 1 right to privacy in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2021 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Tully v. City of Wilmingtongreen
nc · 2018 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021Id. at 529 , 810 S.E.2d at 211 (quotation marks omitted). ¶ 19 Our Supreme Court held that this denial of process violated the officer’s constitutional rights under Article I, Section 1, reasoning the provision applies “when a governmental entity acts in an arbitrary and capricious manner toward one of its employees by failing to abide by promotional procedures that the employer itself put in place.” Id. at 535-36 , 810 S.E.2d at 215 .

2021Id. at 529 , 810 S.E.2d at 211 (quotation marks omitted). ¶ 19 Our Supreme Court held that this denial of process violated the officer’s constitutional rights under Article I, Section 1, reasoning the provision applies “when a governmental entity acts in an arbitrary and capricious manner toward one of its employees by failing to abide by promotional procedures that the employer itself put in place.” Id. at 535-36 , 810 S.E.2d at 215 .

22
River Birch Associates v. City of Raleighgreen
nc · 1990 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999One whose interest in the matter in litigation is not a direct or substantial interest, but is an indirect, inconsequential, or a contingent one cannot claim the right to defend.” Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485 , 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968) (quoting Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 56 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1945)) (emphasis added) (applying former N.C.G.S. § 1-73), quoted in River Birch Assocs. v. City of Raleigh, 326 N.C. 100, 128 , 388 S.E.2d 538, 554 (1990) (applying Rule 24(a)(2)).

1999One whose interest in the matter in litigation is not a direct or substantial interest, but is an indirect, inconsequential, or a contingent one cannot claim the right to defend.” Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485 , 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968) (quoting Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 56 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1945)) (emphasis added) (applying former N.C.G.S. § 1-73), quoted in River Birch Assocs. v. City of Raleigh, 326 N.C. 100, 128 , 388 S.E.2d 538, 554 (1990) (applying Rule 24(a)(2)).

11
Mullen v. Town of Louisburggreen
nc · 1945 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999One whose interest in the matter in litigation is not a direct or substantial interest, but is an indirect, inconsequential, or a contingent one cannot claim the right to defend.” Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485 , 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968) (quoting Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 56 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1945)) (emphasis added) (applying former N.C.G.S. § 1-73), quoted in River Birch Assocs. v. City of Raleigh, 326 N.C. 100, 128 , 388 S.E.2d 538, 554 (1990) (applying Rule 24(a)(2)).

1999One whose interest in the matter in litigation is not a direct or substantial interest, but is an indirect, inconsequential, or a contingent one cannot claim the right to defend.” Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485 , 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968) (quoting Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 56 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1945)) (emphasis added) (applying former N.C.G.S. § 1-73), quoted in River Birch Assocs. v. City of Raleigh, 326 N.C. 100, 128 , 388 S.E.2d 538, 554 (1990) (applying Rule 24(a)(2)).

11
Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. Hughesgreen
nc · 1968 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999One whose interest in the matter in litigation is not a direct or substantial interest, but is an indirect, inconsequential, or a contingent one cannot claim the right to defend.” Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485 , 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968) (quoting Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 56 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1945)) (emphasis added) (applying former N.C.G.S. § 1-73), quoted in River Birch Assocs. v. City of Raleigh, 326 N.C. 100, 128 , 388 S.E.2d 538, 554 (1990) (applying Rule 24(a)(2)).

1999One whose interest in the matter in litigation is not a direct or substantial interest, but is an indirect, inconsequential, or a contingent one cannot claim the right to defend.” Strickland v. Hughes, 273 N.C. 481, 485 , 160 S.E.2d 313, 316 (1968) (quoting Mullen v. Town of Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 56 , 33 S.E.2d 484, 486 (1945)) (emphasis added) (applying former N.C.G.S. § 1-73), quoted in River Birch Assocs. v. City of Raleigh, 326 N.C. 100, 128 , 388 S.E.2d 538, 554 (1990) (applying Rule 24(a)(2)).

11
Matter of Peircegreen
ncctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992App. 373, 388-89 , 281 S.E.2d 198, 207-08 (1981) (analyzing validity of trial court’s amendment to its judgment terminating parental rights under N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 60(a)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Colon v. Bailey green
ncctapp · 1985
1 sentence

2016Id. at 494, 333 S.E.2d at 507 .

12016–2016
Davis v. Town of Southern Pines green
ncctapp · 1994
1 sentence

1995Acknowledging Corum’s limitation on direct actions, we held that “[p]laintiff’s constitutional right not to be unlawfully imprisoned and deprived of her liberty are adequately protected by her common law claim of false imprisonment, which protects her right to be free from unlawful restraint.” Davis, 116 N.C.

11995–1995

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 44 (1978–2026) OH 15 (1920–2023) IL 11 (1921–2025) CA 8 (1915–2024) OR 8 (1993–2012) NY 7 (1923–1993) IN 7 (1883–2025) NC 6 (1992–2021) KS 5 (1976–2026) ID 5 (1998–2024) TX 5 (1939–2015) VA 4 (2013–2024) AR 4 (1916–2006) MD 4 (1973–1997) FL 4 (1985–2018) MT 3 (1990–2015) AZ 2 (1975–1975) NM 2 (2006–2006) DE 2 (2023–2026) KY 2 (2021–2021) WI 2 (2016–2018) OK 2 (1982–1987) HI 2 (2013–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check