Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re O.C.green2 sentences2009See id. 2009See id. | 3 | 4 |
In Re SFgreen2 sentences2014App. 611, 615 , 682 S.E.2d 712, 716 (2009) (citation omitted). 2014“Even if a parent has made some efforts to regain custody, a trial court may still find that he or she willfully left the child in foster care under section 7B– 1111(a)(2).” In re S.F., 198 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Nolen
green
1 sentence2008Id. (quoting In re Nolen, 117 N.C. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In re the Stewart Children
green
1 sentence2002However, this Court has held that “[a] valid finding on one statutorily enumerated ground is sufficient to support an order terminating parental rights.” In re Stewart Children, 82 N.C. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.