Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Stumbogreen2 sentences2021These determinations by the trial court satisfy the requirements of Section 7B-906.2(d)(2), and are analogous to the trial court’s findings which were deemed to have satisfactorily addressed this subsection of the statute by the Court of Appeals in In re N.T., 264 N.C. App. 753 , 2019 WL 1471147 , *6 (2019) (unpublished). ¶ 28 Although the trial court made no specific finding as to whether respondent- mother was “acting in a manner inconsistent with the health or safety of the juvenile” under the exact language of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4), the trial court found that respondent-mother and Liam 2021These determinations by the trial court satisfy the requirements of Section 7B-906.2(d)(2), and are analogous to the trial court’s findings which were deemed to have satisfactorily addressed this subsection of the statute by the Court of Appeals in In re N.T., 264 N.C. App. 753 , 2019 WL 1471147 , *6 (2019) (unpublished). ¶ 28 Although the trial court made no specific finding as to whether respondent- mother was “acting in a manner inconsistent with the health or safety of the juvenile” under the exact language of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4), the trial court found that respondent-mother and Liam | 2 | 2 |
In re K.C.green2 sentences2023See K.C., 226 N.C. App. at 461 , 742 S.E.2d at 245 ; Ferrell, 162 N.C. App. at 177 , 589 S.E.2d at 895-96 . 2015Further, as this Court has recently held, a written adjudication order "satisfies the minimum requirements of section 7B-2411 [when i]t provides the date of the offense, [the class and level of the underlying offense], the date of the adjudication, and clearly states that the court considered the evidence and adjudicated [the juvenile] delinquent as to the petition's allegation ... beyond a reasonable doubt." In re K.C., ---N.C.App. ----, ----, 742 S.E.2d 239 , 245, disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 218 , 747 S.E.2d 530 (2013). | 1 | 2 |
In re: D.E.P.green2 sentences2023See D.E.P., 251 N.C. App. at 759 , 796 S.E.2d at 514 ; G.C., 230 N.C. App. at 521 , 750 S.E.2d at 555 . 2023See D.E.P., 251 N.C. App. at 759 , 796 S.E.2d at 514 ; G.C., 230 N.C. App. at 521 , 750 S.E.2d at 555 . | 1 | 1 |
In re L.B.green1 sentence2014App. 442 , -11- 449, 646 S.E.2d 411, 415 (2007) (reversing and remanding on this issue where the trial court’s order failed to satisfy the requirements of sections 7B-906(b)(1), (3), and (4)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re K.S.K.
neutral
2 sentences2021These determinations by the trial court satisfy the requirements of Section 7B-906.2(d)(2), and are analogous to the trial court’s findings which were deemed to have satisfactorily addressed this subsection of the statute by the Court of Appeals in In re N.T., 264 N.C. App. 753 , 2019 WL 1471147 , *6 (2019) (unpublished). ¶ 28 Although the trial court made no specific finding as to whether respondent- mother was “acting in a manner inconsistent with the health or safety of the juvenile” under the exact language of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4), the trial court found that respondent-mother and Liam 2021These determinations by the trial court satisfy the requirements of Section 7B-906.2(d)(2), and are analogous to the trial court’s findings which were deemed to have satisfactorily addressed this subsection of the statute by the Court of Appeals in In re N.T., 264 N.C. App. 753 , 2019 WL 1471147 , *6 (2019) (unpublished). ¶ 28 Although the trial court made no specific finding as to whether respondent- mother was “acting in a manner inconsistent with the health or safety of the juvenile” under the exact language of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4), the trial court found that respondent-mother and Liam | 2 | 2021–2021 |
In re L.M.T.
green
2 sentences2021We conclude that these findings by the trial court adequately address the substance and concerns of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4) through the application of the principle in In re L.M.T., 367 N.C. at 168 , in which we recognized earlier that the trial court is not required to quote the exact language of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4) as long as the trial court’s written findings address the statute’s concerns. ¶ 29 However, we agree with respondent-mother that the trial court failed to make the findings required by N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(3), as to whether respondent-mother “remains available to the cou 2021We conclude that these findings by the trial court adequately address the substance and concerns of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4) through the application of the principle in In re L.M.T., 367 N.C. at 168 , in which we recognized earlier that the trial court is not required to quote the exact language of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(4) as long as the trial court’s written findings address the statute’s concerns. ¶ 29 However, we agree with respondent-mother that the trial court failed to make the findings required by N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d)(3), as to whether respondent-mother “remains available to the cou | 2 | 2021–2021 |
In re L.L.
green
1 sentence2026Because the findings of fact in the permanency planning order were sufficient to satisfy the requirements of N.C.G.S. § 7B-906.2(d) under our precedent in In re L.L., 386 N.C. 706 , 909 S.E.2d 151 (2024), the concurrence in part and dissent in part’s discussion of remand rather than vacatur as the proper remedy for insufficient findings was unnecessary. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
In re B.L.H.
neutral
1 sentence2023In order to satisfy the requirement of § 7B-1109(f), and therefore appropriately protect parents’ constitutional rights, see id., a trial court must “announce[] the ‘clear, cogent, and convincing’ standard of proof either in making findings of fact in the written - 14 - termination order or in making such findings in open court.” In re B.L.H., 376 N.C. 118 , 126, 852 S.E.2d 91 , 97 (2020) (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In re G.C.
green
2 sentences2023See D.E.P., 251 N.C. App. at 759 , 796 S.E.2d at 514 ; G.C., 230 N.C. App. at 521 , 750 S.E.2d at 555 . 2023See D.E.P., 251 N.C. App. at 759 , 796 S.E.2d at 514 ; G.C., 230 N.C. App. at 521 , 750 S.E.2d at 555 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Ferrell
green
2 sentences2023See K.C., 226 N.C. App. at 461 , 742 S.E.2d at 245 ; Ferrell, 162 N.C. App. at 177 , 589 S.E.2d at 895-96 . 2023See K.C., 226 N.C. App. at 461 , 742 S.E.2d at 245 ; Ferrell, 162 N.C. App. at 177 , 589 S.E.2d at 895-96 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In re K.C.
green
1 sentence2015Further, as this Court has recently held, a written adjudication order "satisfies the minimum requirements of section 7B-2411 [when i]t provides the date of the offense, [the class and level of the underlying offense], the date of the adjudication, and clearly states that the court considered the evidence and adjudicated [the juvenile] delinquent as to the petition's allegation ... beyond a reasonable doubt." In re K.C., ---N.C.App. ----, ----, 742 S.E.2d 239 , 245, disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 218 , 747 S.E.2d 530 (2013). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Hardesty
green
1 sentence2006Id. at 384, 563 S.E.2d at 82 (citing In re Quevedo, 106 N.C. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Matter of Quevedo
green
1 sentence2006Id. at 384, 563 S.E.2d at 82 (citing In re Quevedo, 106 N.C. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.