Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2022–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kinsley v. Ace Speedway Racing, Ltd.green2 sentences2025To successfully plead a valid Corum claim, a plaintiff must allege (1) state action, (2) a “colorable” state constitutional claim, and (3) the absence of any other “adequate state remedy.” Kinsley, 386 N.C. at 423, 904 S.E.2d at 726 (quoting Deminski, 377 N.C. at 413, 858 S.E.2d at 793-94). 2025To successfully plead a valid Corum claim, a plaintiff must allege (1) state action, (2) a “colorable” state constitutional claim, and (3) the absence of any other “adequate state remedy.” Kinsley, 386 N.C. at 423, 904 S.E.2d at 726 (quoting Deminski, 377 N.C. at 413, 858 S.E.2d at 793-94). | 2 | 2 |
Deminski v. State Bd. of Educ.green2 sentences2025To successfully plead a valid Corum claim, a plaintiff must allege (1) state action, (2) a “colorable” state constitutional claim, and (3) the absence of any other “adequate state remedy.” Kinsley, 386 N.C. at 423, 904 S.E.2d at 726 (quoting Deminski, 377 N.C. at 413, 858 S.E.2d at 793-94). 2025To successfully plead a valid Corum claim, a plaintiff must allege (1) state action, (2) a “colorable” state constitutional claim, and (3) the absence of any other “adequate state remedy.” Kinsley, 386 N.C. at 423, 904 S.E.2d at 726 (quoting Deminski, 377 N.C. at 413, 858 S.E.2d at 793-94). | 2 | 2 |
Washington v. Clinegreen1 sentence2025“Corum claims are constitutional claims for damages directly against the State,” and the underlying justification for these claims is the theory that where there is a violation of a right, there should be some corresponding remedy. -11- Washington, 385 N.C. at 825 (2024). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. Wake Cty.
green
2 sentences2022This failure to plead a valid constitutional claim based on these grounds is fatal to Plaintiffs’ Corum claim based on these grounds because a valid Corum claim requires establishing “state constitutional rights have been violated.” Taylor, 258 N.C. App. at 183 , 811 S.E.2d at 652 . 2022This failure to plead a valid constitutional claim based on these grounds is fatal to Plaintiffs’ Corum claim based on these grounds because a valid Corum claim requires establishing “state constitutional rights have been violated.” Taylor, 258 N.C. App. at 183 , 811 S.E.2d at 652 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Askew v. City of Kinston
green
1 sentence2024Id. at __, slip op. at 7. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Corum v. University of North Carolina
green
1 sentence2024As we explained in Corum, when there is “a clash between these constitutional rights and sovereign immunity, the constitutional rights must prevail.” Corum, 330 N.C. at 786 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.