Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1965–1978 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bullock v. . Cooleygreen2 sentences1978In Matter of Vetere v Allen ( 15 NY2d 259 ), the court stated (p 265): "The purpose of the grant of quasi-judicial powers under section 310 of the Education Law is 'to make all matters pertaining to the general school system of the state within the authority and control of the department of education and to remove the same as far as practicable and possible from controversies in the courts’ (Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566 ***).*** 'But in passing upon the propriety of educational policy by a particular school board or school district, he acts in a broader capacity than the courts, by reviewi 1971With regard to the above the language employed by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Vetere v. Allen, (15 N. Y. 2d 259, 265-266) is to be noted. “ The purpose of the grant of quasi-judicial powers under section 310 of the Education Law is ‘ to make all matters pertaining to the general school system of the state within the authority and control of the department of education and to remove the same as far as practicable and possible from controversies in the courts ’ (Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566, 576-577 [1919]). ‘ By our state system of education protected by the Constitution and developed | 3 | 5 |
People Ex Rel. Bd. of Education v. . Finleygreen2 sentences1971Board of Educ. of City of N.Y. v. Finley, 211 N. Y. 51, 57 [1914]). ‘In appraising the judicial nature of the act of the Commissioner of Education, it must be remembered that he combines both judicial and administrative functions. 1966Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Finley, 211 N. Y. 51, 57 [1914]). ‘In appraising the judicial nature of the act of the Commissioner of Education, it must be remembered that he combines both judicial and administrative functions. ’ ” It is clear that respondent could properly substitute his own judgment for that of the Superintendent’s even without a finding of arbitrariness on the part of the Superintendent, and the courts will not interfere with respondent’s final determination unless it be shown to be purely arbitrary. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vetere v. Allen
green
2 sentences1978In Matter of Vetere v Allen ( 15 NY2d 259 ), the court stated (p 265): "The purpose of the grant of quasi-judicial powers under section 310 of the Education Law is 'to make all matters pertaining to the general school system of the state within the authority and control of the department of education and to remove the same as far as practicable and possible from controversies in the courts’ (Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566 ***).*** 'But in passing upon the propriety of educational policy by a particular school board or school district, he acts in a broader capacity than the courts, by reviewi 1972(Matter of Vetere v. Allen, 15 NY 2d 259, 265 .) The Commissioner of Education is not bound by the judgment of the officer whose action he is reviewing under section 310 of the Education Law and may substitute his own judgment for that of the officer whose action he is reviewing. | 2 | 1972–1978 |
People v. Rankin
neutral
1 sentence1978In Matter of Vetere v Allen ( 15 NY2d 259 ), the court stated (p 265): "The purpose of the grant of quasi-judicial powers under section 310 of the Education Law is 'to make all matters pertaining to the general school system of the state within the authority and control of the department of education and to remove the same as far as practicable and possible from controversies in the courts’ (Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566 ***).*** 'But in passing upon the propriety of educational policy by a particular school board or school district, he acts in a broader capacity than the courts, by reviewi | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.