Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Telfer v. Maher
neutral
2 sentences2010Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he was entitled to a $500 limit, on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g) (see Matter of Conwell v Booth, 66 AD3d 773 [2009]; Matter of Telfer v Maher, 270 AD2d 494 [2000]). 2009Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he was entitled to a $500 limit on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g) (see Matter of Telfer v Maher, 270 AD2d 494 [2000]). | 2 | 2009–2010 |
Matter of Briggs v. McKinney-Mays
neutral
1 sentence2021As such, the child support arrears cap pursuant to Family Court Act § 413(1)(g) did not apply here ( see Matter of Briggs v McKinney-Mays , 141 AD3d 648, 649 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Matter of Dailey v. Govan
green
1 sentence2018However, this contention is not properly before this Court, as it was not raised in the father's objections to the Support Magistrate's order ( see Matter of Dailey v Govan , 136 AD3d 1029, 1031 ; Matter of Worner v Gavin , 134 AD3d 1043 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Matter of Worner v. Gavin
neutral
1 sentence2018However, this contention is not properly before this Court, as it was not raised in the father's objections to the Support Magistrate's order ( see Matter of Dailey v Govan , 136 AD3d 1029, 1031 ; Matter of Worner v Gavin , 134 AD3d 1043 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Briggs v. McKinney-Mays
green
1 sentence2016The motion was denied, and the father appealed to this Court, which reversed and remitted the matter to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a hearing on the father’s financial circumstances during the relevant period and a new determination of his motion thereafter (see Matter of Briggs v McKinney-Mays, 112 AD3d 622 [2013]). *649 After conducting a hearing upon remittal, the Support Magistrate properly denied the father’s motion on the ground that he failed to show an inability to work during the relevant period. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Conwell v. Booth
green
1 sentence2010Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he was entitled to a $500 limit, on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g) (see Matter of Conwell v Booth, 66 AD3d 773 [2009]; Matter of Telfer v Maher, 270 AD2d 494 [2000]). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Miller v. Miller
green
1 sentence1996On October 14, 1994, DSS filed objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order and, in the order appealed from, the Family Court denied such objections, holding that the Hearing Examiner properly proceeded in accordance with Judge Jurow’s order, that such order was the law of this case and agreeing that the six-year Statute of Limitations was properly applied in this case (citing, inter alia, Tauber v Lebow, 65 NY2d 596, supra; Miller v Miller, 156 AD2d 164, 165 ). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.