Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2018–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Whittengreen2 sentences2024“We review a lower court’s interpretation of a constitutional provision for legal error.” State v. Rangel, 328 Or 294, 298 , 977 P2d 379 (1999); see also State v. Whitten, 278 Or App 627, 628 , 379 P3d 707 (2016) (reviewing for errors of law a trial court’s determination that a traffic violation proceeding is not a “criminal prosecution” pursuant to Article I, section 11). 2024“We review a lower court’s interpretation of a constitutional provision for legal error.” State v. Rangel, 328 Or 294, 298 , 977 P2d 379 (1999); see also State v. Whitten, 278 Or App 627, 628 , 379 P3d 707 (2016) (reviewing for errors of law a trial court’s determination that a traffic violation proceeding is not a “criminal prosecution” pursuant to Article I, section 11). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rangel
green
2 sentences2024“We review a lower court’s interpretation of a constitutional provision for legal error.” State v. Rangel, 328 Or 294, 298 , 977 P2d 379 (1999); see also State v. Whitten, 278 Or App 627, 628 , 379 P3d 707 (2016) (reviewing for errors of law a trial court’s determination that a traffic violation proceeding is not a “criminal prosecution” pursuant to Article I, section 11). 2024“We review a lower court’s interpretation of a constitutional provision for legal error.” State v. Rangel, 328 Or 294, 298 , 977 P2d 379 (1999); see also State v. Whitten, 278 Or App 627, 628 , 379 P3d 707 (2016) (reviewing for errors of law a trial court’s determination that a traffic violation proceeding is not a “criminal prosecution” pursuant to Article I, section 11). | 6 | 2018–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.