Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ellis v. City of Yanktongreen2 sentences2012Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Gretkowski, 205 F.3d at 123; Ellis v. City of Yankton, 69 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir.1995). 2001Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Gretkowski, 205 F.3d at 123 ; Ellis v. City of Yankton, 69 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir.1995). | 3 | 3 |
Rubinovitz v. Rogatogreen2 sentences2001Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 229 , 106 S. Ct. 507, 516 , 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (Powell, J., concurring); Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State Univ., 227 F.3d at 140 ; Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906, 910-11 (1st Cir.1995); LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous. 2001Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 229 , 106 S.Ct. 507, 516 , 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (Powell, J., concurring); Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State Univ., 227 F.3d at 140 ; Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906, 910-11 (1st Cir.1995); LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous. | 2 | 2 |
Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewinggreen2 sentences2001Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 229 , 106 S.Ct. 507, 516 , 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (Powell, J., concurring); Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State Univ., 227 F.3d at 140 ; Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906, 910-11 (1st Cir.1995); LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous. 2001Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 229 , 106 S.Ct. 507, 516 , 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (Powell, J., concurring); Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State Univ., 227 F.3d at 140 ; Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906, 910-11 (1st Cir.1995); LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous. | 1 | 2 |
Paterek v. Village of Armada, Michigangreen1 sentence2022Tenn. June 14, 2017) (quoting Paterek v. Village of Armada, 801 F.3d 630, 649 (6th Cir. 2015)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. W. J. Gretkowski
red
2 sentences2001Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Gretkowski, 205 F.3d at 123 ; Ellis v. City of Yankton, 69 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir.1995). 2001Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Gretkowski, 205 F.3d at 123 ; Ellis v. City of Yankton, 69 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 1995). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State University
green
2 sentences2001Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 229 , 106 S. Ct. 507, 516 , 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (Powell, J., concurring); Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State Univ., 227 F.3d at 140 ; Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906, 910-11 (1st Cir.1995); LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous. 2001Regents of the Univ. of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214, 229 , 106 S.Ct. 507, 516 , 88 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985) (Powell, J., concurring); Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State Univ., 227 F.3d at 140 ; Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906, 910-11 (1st Cir.1995); LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Parks Properties v. Maury County
green
1 sentence2018For a property right to provide a basis for a substantive due process claim under Section 1983, the right must involve an interest that is deemed to be fundamental under the United States Constitution. 15 Parks Prop., 70 S.W.3d at 743–45 (internal citations omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Daniels v. Williams
green
2 sentences2001County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. at 849 , 118 S.Ct. at 1718 ; Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. at 331 , 106 S.Ct. at 665 . *745 To prevail on a substantive due process claim under Section 1983, a plaintiff must establish as a threshold matter that it has an interest entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause. 2001County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. at 849 , 118 S.Ct. at 1718 ; Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. at 331 , 106 S.Ct. at 665 . *745 To prevail on a substantive due process claim under Section 1983, a plaintiff must establish as a threshold matter that it has an interest entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
County of Sacramento v. Lewis
red
2 sentences2001County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. at 849 , 118 S.Ct. at 1718 ; Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. at 331 , 106 S.Ct. at 665 . *745 To prevail on a substantive due process claim under Section 1983, a plaintiff must establish as a threshold matter that it has an interest entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause. 2001County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. at 849 , 118 S.Ct. at 1718 ; Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. at 331 , 106 S.Ct. at 665 . *745 To prevail on a substantive due process claim under Section 1983, a plaintiff must establish as a threshold matter that it has an interest entitled to protection under the Due Process Clause. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
green
2 sentences1992Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422 , 102 S.Ct. 1148 , 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982). 1992Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422 , 102 S.Ct. 1148 , 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.