Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kellygreen2 sentences2015Although trial counsel raised no objection to the trial court’s failure to charge on mutual combat after the instructions were delivered, appellant asserts the trial court’s failure to charge constitutes plain error that merits appellate review pursuant to OCGA § 17-8-58 (b) and State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29, 31 (1) ( 718 SE2d 232 ) (2011). 2015Although trial counsel raised no objection to the trial court’s failure to charge on mutual combat after the instructions were delivered, appellant asserts the trial court’s failure to charge constitutes plain error that merits appellate review pursuant to OCGA § 17-8-58 (b) and State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29, 31 (1) ( 718 SE2d 232 ) (2011). | 2 | 2 |
Blankenship v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See Blankenship v. State, 301 Ga. App. 602, 606 (4) ( 688 SE2d 395 ) (2009). 2021See Blankenship v. State, 301 Ga. App. 602, 606 (4) ( 688 SE2d 395 ) (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Collier v. Stategreen2 sentences2012State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29, 32 (1) ( 718 SE2d 232 ) (2011); Collier v. State, 288 Ga. 756, 759 ( 707 SE2d 102 ) (2011). 2012State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29, 32 (1) ( 718 SE2d 232 ) (2011); Collier v. State, 288 Ga. 756, 759 ( 707 SE2d 102 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Boring v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., Boring v. State, 303 Ga. App. 576, 580 ( 694 SE2d 157 ) (2010) (“OCGA § 17-8-58 (b) precludes appellate review of challenges to the jury charge where the criminal defendant has failed to object in accordance with subsection (a) of that statute, which requires a defendant to inform the court of the specific objection and the grounds for such objection before the jury retires to deliberate [citing Metz]. 2011See, e.g., Boring v. State, 303 Ga. App. 576, 580 ( 694 SE2d 157 ) (2010) (“OCGA § 17-8-58 (b) precludes appellate review of challenges to the jury charge where the criminal defendant has failed to object in accordance with subsection (a) of that statute, which requires a defendant to inform the court of the specific objection and the grounds for such objection before the jury retires to deliberate [citing Metz]. | 1 | 1 |
Metz v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Metz v. State, 284 Ga. 614, 619-620 (5) ( 669 SE2d 121 ) (2008). 2010Metz v. State, 284 Ga. 614, 619-620 (5) ( 669 SE2d 121 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.