Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1991–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mealor v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Mealor v. State, 233 Ga. App. 193, 194 (2) ( 504 SE2d 29 ) (1998) (explaining requirements); Peachtree North Apts. v. Arkhora Assoc., 140 Ga. App. 20, 21 (2) ( 230 SE2d 83 ) (1976) (testimony of corporate officer that time sheets were kept in normal course of business established admissibility). 1999See Mealor v. State, 233 Ga. App. 193, 194 (2) ( 504 SE2d 29 ) (1998) (explaining requirements); Peachtree North Apts. v. Arkhora Assoc., 140 Ga. App. 20, 21 (2) ( 230 SE2d 83 ) (1976) (testimony of corporate officer that time sheets were kept in normal course of business established admissibility). | 2 | 2 |
Peachtree North Apartments Company v. Arkhora Associates Inc.green2 sentences1999See Mealor v. State, 233 Ga. App. 193, 194 (2) ( 504 SE2d 29 ) (1998) (explaining requirements); Peachtree North Apts. v. Arkhora Assoc., 140 Ga. App. 20, 21 (2) ( 230 SE2d 83 ) (1976) (testimony of corporate officer that time sheets were kept in normal course of business established admissibility). 1999See Mealor v. State, 233 Ga. App. 193, 194 (2) ( 504 SE2d 29 ) (1998) (explaining requirements); Peachtree North Apts. v. Arkhora Assoc., 140 Ga. App. 20, 21 (2) ( 230 SE2d 83 ) (1976) (testimony of corporate officer that time sheets were kept in normal course of business established admissibility). | 2 | 2 |
Suarez v. Suarezgreen2 sentences1998Suarez v. Suarez, 257 Ga. 102, 103-104 (2) ( 355 SE2d 649 ) (1987). 1998Suarez v. Suarez, 257 Ga. 102, 103-104 (2) ( 355 SE2d 649 ) (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences1998In Brown v. State, 268 Ga. 76, 80-81 ( 485 SE2d 486 ) (1997), the Supreme Court held that “breath-testing device certificates are records made within the regular course of the business within the meaning of OCGA § 24-3-14 and may, upon the proper foundation being laid, be introduced into evidence under the business record exception to the hearsay rule.” The foundational requirements of OCGA § 24-3-14 (b) are that a witness who is familiar with the method of keeping records testifies to facts which show that the record sought to be admitted was made in the regular course of business at the time 1998In Brown v. State, 268 Ga. 76, 80-81 ( 485 SE2d 486 ) (1997), the Supreme Court held that “breath-testing device certificates are records made within the regular course of the business within the meaning of OCGA § 24-3-14 and may, upon the proper foundation being laid, be introduced into evidence under the business record exception to the hearsay rule.” The foundational requirements of OCGA § 24-3-14 (b) are that a witness who is familiar with the method of keeping records testifies to facts which show that the record sought to be admitted was made in the regular course of business at the time | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Compare Daniel v. State, 227 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 475 SE2d 610 ) (1997) (State’s failure to satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 24-3-14 for the admission of business records rendered inadmissible the certificates tendered under OCGA § 40-6-392). | 1 | 1 |
Daniel v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Compare Daniel v. State, 227 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 475 SE2d 610 ) (1997) (State’s failure to satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 24-3-14 for the admission of business records rendered inadmissible the certificates tendered under OCGA § 40-6-392). | 1 | 1 |
Thomasson v. Trust Company Bankgreen2 sentences1991Thomasson v. Trust Co. Bank, 149 Ga. App. 556, 557-558 ( 254 SE2d 881 ). 1991Thomasson v. Trust Co. Bank, 149 Ga. App. 556, 557-558 ( 254 SE2d 881 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.