Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnston v. Warendhgreen2 sentences2020Citing Johnston v. Warendh, 252 Ga. App. 674, 678 (3) ( 556 SE2d 867 ) (2001), disapproved of on other grounds by S&S Towing & Recovery, Ltd. v. Charnota, ___ Ga. ___ ( 844 SE2d 730 ) (2020), where this Court noted the lack of precedent “which provides for liability for dog bites other than OCGA § 51-2-7 and the premises liability statute, OCGA § 51-3- 6 1[,]” the Supreme Court of Georgia made no determination about whether OCGA § 44-7-14 can be used to hold out-of-possession landlords liable for injuries resulting from dog bites. 2020Citing Johnston v. Warendh, 252 Ga. App. 674, 678 (3) ( 556 SE2d 867 ) (2001), disapproved of on other grounds by S&S Towing & Recovery, Ltd. v. Charnota, ___ Ga. ___ ( 844 SE2d 730 ) (2020), where this Court noted the lack of precedent “which provides for liability for dog bites other than OCGA § 51-2-7 and the premises liability statute, OCGA § 51-3- 6 1[,]” the Supreme Court of Georgia made no determination about whether OCGA § 44-7-14 can be used to hold out-of-possession landlords liable for injuries resulting from dog bites. | 3 | 3 |
Tyner v. Matta-Troncosogreen1 sentence2020Tyner, 305 Ga. at 484 (3). | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Danforthgreen2 sentences2001See Webb v. Danforth, 234 Ga. App. 211, 212 , 505 S.E.2d 860 (1998) (scienter required for landowner to be liable). 2001See Webb v. Danforth, 234 Ga. App. 211, 212 , 505 S.E.2d 860 (1998) (scienter required for landowner to be liable). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
S&S TOWING & RECOVERY, LTD v. CHARNOTA
green
1 sentence2020Citing Johnston v. Warendh, 252 Ga. App. 674, 678 (3) ( 556 SE2d 867 ) (2001), disapproved of on other grounds by S&S Towing & Recovery, Ltd. v. Charnota, ___ Ga. ___ ( 844 SE2d 730 ) (2020), where this Court noted the lack of precedent “which provides for liability for dog bites other than OCGA § 51-2-7 and the premises liability statute, OCGA § 51-3- 6 1[,]” the Supreme Court of Georgia made no determination about whether OCGA § 44-7-14 can be used to hold out-of-possession landlords liable for injuries resulting from dog bites. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Callaway v. Miller
green
2 sentences2001The appellees have cited no precedent, other than Callaway, 118 Ga.App. 309 , 163 S.E.2d 336 , and we have found none, which provides for liability for dog bites other than OCGA § 51-2-7 and the premises liability statute, OCGA § 51-3-1. 2001The appellees have cited no precedent, other than Callaway, 118 Ga.App. 309 , 163 S.E.2d 336 , and we have found none, which provides for liability for dog bites other than OCGA § 51-2-7 and the premises liability statute, OCGA § 51-3-1. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Carr v. Young
neutral
2 sentences1987To the extent that Carr v. Young, 120 Ga. App. 464 ( 170 SE2d 834 ) (1969) holds that the dog's breed and size and the fact of the dog's general restraint is evidence of the owner's knowledge of the dog's vicious or dangerous propensities, it is inconsistent with the correct rule. 1987To the extent that Carr v. Young, 120 Ga. App. 464 ( 170 SE2d 834 ) (1969) holds that the dog's breed and size and the fact of the dog's general restraint is evidence of the owner's knowledge of the dog's vicious or dangerous propensities, it is inconsistent with the correct rule. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.