Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Prairie Material Sales, Inc.green1 sentence2001See Brady v. Prairie Material Sales, Inc., 190 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Eichengreen v. Rollins, Inc.
green
1 sentence2002The Air Safety court noted that this approach has been referred to as the ‘four corners’ rule. [Citation.] The ‘four corners’ rule has been described as related, although not identical, to the paroi evidence rule. [Citation.] The paroi evidence rule has been explained as follows: ‘[The parole evidence] rule generally precludes evidence of understandings, not reflected in a writing, reached before or at the time of its execution which would vary or modify its terms.’ [Citation.] *** A party may not introduce paroi or extrinsic evidence to show additional consistent terms of a contract unless th | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Dremco, Inc. v. Hartz Construction Co.
green
1 sentence2002Dremco, Inc. v. Hartz Construction Co., 261 Ill. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Ballard v. Granby
green
1 sentence2001That argument ignores the established rule: “[W]here mutual mistake or fraud is alleged, paroi evidence is admissible to show the true intent and understanding of the parties.” Ballard, 90 Ill. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Magnus v. LUTHERN GEN. HEALTH CARE SYS.
green
1 sentence1997Magnus v. Lutheran General Health Care System, 235 Ill. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Geoquest Productions, Ltd. v. Embassy Home Entertainment
green
1 sentence1994"Under the paroi evidence rule, extrinsic or paroi evidence concerning a prior or contemporaneous agreement is not admissible to vary or contradict a fully integrated writing.” (Geoquest Productions, Ltd. v. Embassy Home Entertainment (1992), 229 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.