34 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Abbottgreen2 sentences1979Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c) provides that a summary judgment shall be entered, if ". . . the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.” (Emphasis supplied.) "Nowhere in the statute is there any requirement that these items be introduced into evidence. [Indeed, in view of] the harsh nature of the remedy involved, a trial judge should always search the entire record before granting a motion for summary judgment, and should not limit himself to the evidence introduced a 1979Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c) provides that a summary judgment shall be entered, if ". . . the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.” (Emphasis supplied.) "Nowhere in the statute is there any requirement that these items be introduced into evidence. [Indeed, in view of] the harsh nature of the remedy involved, a trial judge should always search the entire record before granting a motion for summary judgment, and should not limit himself to the evidence introduced a | 6 | 7 |
In the Interest of M. A. C.green2 sentences2004Even if the juvenile court had improperly considered the hearsay evidence, such consideration will not constitute reversible error where "the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [inadmissible hearsay], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge." In the Interest of M.A.C., 244 Ga. 645, 655 (4), 261 S.E.2d 590 (1979). 2001However, the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay contained in such records will not constitute reversible error where "the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the report, was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge." In the Interest of M.A.C., 244 Ga. 645, 655 , 261 S.E.2d 590 (1979). | 5 | 6 |
In Re AAgreen2 sentences2006Even if the juvenile court did consider hearsay, however, “the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court’s consideration of hearsay contained in such records will not constitute reversible error where the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the report, was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of A. A., 252 Ga. App. 167, 168 (1) ( 555 SE2d 827 ) (2001). 2006Even if the juvenile court did consider hearsay, however, “the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court’s consideration of hearsay contained in such records will not constitute reversible error where the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the report, was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of A. A., 252 Ga. App. 167, 168 (1) ( 555 SE2d 827 ) (2001). | 4 | 4 |
In the Interest of T. A. M.green2 sentences2011A. M., 280 Ga. App. at 499 (3) (“the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court’s consideration of hearsay . . . will not constitute reversible error [if] the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [hearsayl, was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of” the court) (punctuation omitted). 2011Cf. In the Interest of T.A.M., 280 Ga.App. at 499 (3), 634 S.E.2d 456 ("the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay ... will not constitute reversible error [if] the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [hearsay], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of" the court) (punctuation omitted). [6] See In the Interest of M.K., 288 Ga.App. at 73 (1), 653 S.E.2d 354 . | 2 | 2 |
Fulton County Board of Assessors v. Calliope Properties, LLCgreen2 sentences2012Calliope, supra, 312 Ga. App. at 880 (3). 2012Calliope, supra, 312 Ga. App. at 880 (3). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of M. K.green1 sentence2011Cf. In the Interest of T.A.M., 280 Ga.App. at 499 (3), 634 S.E.2d 456 ("the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay ... will not constitute reversible error [if] the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [hearsay], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of" the court) (punctuation omitted). [6] See In the Interest of M.K., 288 Ga.App. at 73 (1), 653 S.E.2d 354 . | 1 | 1 |
Sacks v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.green2 sentences1983Laboratories, 149 Ga. App. 799, 800 ( 256 SE2d 87 ) (1979). 1983Laboratories, 149 Ga. App. 799, 800 ( 256 SE2d 87 ) (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Hewlett v. Hewlettgreen2 sentences1979Carter v. Carter, 240 Ga. 597 ( 242 SE2d 94 ) (1978); Johnson v. Johnson, 236 Ga. 647 ( 225 SE2d 36 ) (1976); Hewlett v. Hewlett, 220 Ga. 656, 657 ( 140 SE2d 898 ) (1965); Walton v. Walton, supra. The evidence introduced at the hearing, concerning the needs of the wife and the husband’s ability to pay, support the trial court’s award and, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. 2. 1979Carter v. Carter, 240 Ga. 597 ( 242 SE2d 94 ) (1978); Johnson v. Johnson, 236 Ga. 647 ( 225 SE2d 36 ) (1976); Hewlett v. Hewlett, 220 Ga. 656, 657 ( 140 SE2d 898 ) (1965); Walton v. Walton, supra. The evidence introduced at the hearing, concerning the needs of the wife and the husband’s ability to pay, support the trial court’s award and, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. 2. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Browngreen2 sentences1977Brown v. Brown, 230 Ga. 566, 568 ( 198 SE2d 182 ) (1973). 1977Brown v. Brown, 230 Ga. 566, 568 ( 198 SE2d 182 ) (1973). | 1 | 1 |
McLendon v. Stategreen2 sentences1952Compare McLendon v. State, 205 Ga. 55 ( 52 S. E. 2d, 294 ). 1952Compare McLendon v. State, 205 Ga. 55 ( 52 S. E. 2d, 294 ). | 1 | 1 |
Roberts v. City of Cairogreen2 sentences1916Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ), and citations; Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 ( 72 S. E. 907 ); Barrow v. Barrow, 139 Ga. 806 ( 78 S. E. 123 ). 1916Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ), and citations; Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 ( 72 S. E. 907 ); Barrow v. Barrow, 139 Ga. 806 ( 78 S. E. 123 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sparks v. Caldwell
green
2 sentences2004Even if the juvenile court had improperly considered the hearsay evidence, such consideration will not constitute reversible error where "the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [inadmissible hearsay], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge." In the Interest of M.A.C., 244 Ga. 645, 655 (4), 261 S.E.2d 590 (1979). 2001However, the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay contained in such records will not constitute reversible error where "the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the report, was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge." In the Interest of M.A.C., 244 Ga. 645, 655 , 261 S.E.2d 590 (1979). | 6 | 1988–2004 |
In the Interest of J. T. S.
green
2 sentences1999However, even if portions of the panel's reports were inadmissible as hearsay which did not qualify under the business records exception, "the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay contained in such [reports] will not constitute reversible error where the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the report[s], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.T.S., 185 Ga. App. 772, 774 , 365 S.E.2d 550 (1988). 1999However, even if portions of the panel's reports were inadmissible as hearsay which did not qualify under the business records exception, "the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay contained in such [reports] will not constitute reversible error where the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the report[s], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the juvenile court judge." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.T.S., 185 Ga. App. 772, 774 , 365 S.E.2d 550 (1988). | 2 | 1999–2001 |
In Re MK
green
1 sentence2011Cf. In the Interest of T.A.M., 280 Ga.App. at 499 (3), 634 S.E.2d 456 ("the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay ... will not constitute reversible error [if] the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [hearsay], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of" the court) (punctuation omitted). [6] See In the Interest of M.K., 288 Ga.App. at 73 (1), 653 S.E.2d 354 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Tam
green
1 sentence2011Cf. In the Interest of T.A.M., 280 Ga.App. at 499 (3), 634 S.E.2d 456 ("the Georgia Supreme Court has held that a trial court's consideration of hearsay ... will not constitute reversible error [if] the evidence introduced at the hearing, not considering the [hearsay], was sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of" the court) (punctuation omitted). [6] See In the Interest of M.K., 288 Ga.App. at 73 (1), 653 S.E.2d 354 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Mims v. State
green
1 sentence1994He reserved the right to appeal th< denial of his motion to suppress pursuant to Mims v. State, 201 Ga App. 277, 278-279 (1) ( 410 SE2d 824 ) (1991). 1 The evidence introduced at the hearing on the motion to sup press showed that law enforcement officers executed an arrest warran for Keith Parr at his home in Clayton County. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Jackson v. Jackson
neutral
2 sentences1985In the absence of a transcript, we must assume that evidence amended the pleadings under [OCGA § 9-11-15 (b)] and authorized the verdict rendered. [Cits.]” Jackson v. Jackson, 243 Ga. 338 ( 253 SE2d 758 ) (1979). 1985In the absence of a transcript, we must assume that evidence amended the pleadings under [OCGA § 9-11-15 (b)] and authorized the verdict rendered. [Cits.]” Jackson v. Jackson, 243 Ga. 338 ( 253 SE2d 758 ) (1979). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Carter v. Carter
neutral
2 sentences1979Carter v. Carter, 240 Ga. 597 ( 242 SE2d 94 ) (1978); Johnson v. Johnson, 236 Ga. 647 ( 225 SE2d 36 ) (1976); Hewlett v. Hewlett, 220 Ga. 656, 657 ( 140 SE2d 898 ) (1965); Walton v. Walton, supra. The evidence introduced at the hearing, concerning the needs of the wife and the husband’s ability to pay, support the trial court’s award and, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. 2. 1979Carter v. Carter, 240 Ga. 597 ( 242 SE2d 94 ) (1978); Johnson v. Johnson, 236 Ga. 647 ( 225 SE2d 36 ) (1976); Hewlett v. Hewlett, 220 Ga. 656, 657 ( 140 SE2d 898 ) (1965); Walton v. Walton, supra. The evidence introduced at the hearing, concerning the needs of the wife and the husband’s ability to pay, support the trial court’s award and, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. 2. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Ogden Equipment Co. v. Talmadge Farms, Inc.
green
2 sentences1979Co. v. Talmadge Farms, Inc., 232 Ga. 614 ( 208 SE2d 459 ). 1979Co. v. Talmadge Farms, Inc., 232 Ga. 614 ( 208 SE2d 459 ). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Johnson v. Johnson
neutral
2 sentences1979Carter v. Carter, 240 Ga. 597 ( 242 SE2d 94 ) (1978); Johnson v. Johnson, 236 Ga. 647 ( 225 SE2d 36 ) (1976); Hewlett v. Hewlett, 220 Ga. 656, 657 ( 140 SE2d 898 ) (1965); Walton v. Walton, supra. The evidence introduced at the hearing, concerning the needs of the wife and the husband’s ability to pay, support the trial court’s award and, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. 2. 1979Carter v. Carter, 240 Ga. 597 ( 242 SE2d 94 ) (1978); Johnson v. Johnson, 236 Ga. 647 ( 225 SE2d 36 ) (1976); Hewlett v. Hewlett, 220 Ga. 656, 657 ( 140 SE2d 898 ) (1965); Walton v. Walton, supra. The evidence introduced at the hearing, concerning the needs of the wife and the husband’s ability to pay, support the trial court’s award and, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. 2. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Jackson v. Couch Funeral Home, Inc.
green
2 sentences1978(Emphasis supplied.)" Jackson v. Couch Funeral Home, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 695 ( 206 SE2d 718 ) (1974). 1978(Emphasis supplied.)" Jackson v. Couch Funeral Home, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 695 ( 206 SE2d 718 ) (1974). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Hewell v. State
green
2 sentences1976Nunnally v. State, 235 Ga. 693 (4) ( 221 SE2d 547 ) (1975); Hewell v. State, 232 Ga. 175 ( 205 SE2d 216 ) (1974). 5. 1976Nunnally v. State, 235 Ga. 693 (4) ( 221 SE2d 547 ) (1975); Hewell v. State, 232 Ga. 175 ( 205 SE2d 216 ) (1974). 5. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Nunnally v. State
green
2 sentences1976Nunnally v. State, 235 Ga. 693 (4) ( 221 SE2d 547 ) (1975); Hewell v. State, 232 Ga. 175 ( 205 SE2d 216 ) (1974). 5. 1976Nunnally v. State, 235 Ga. 693 (4) ( 221 SE2d 547 ) (1975); Hewell v. State, 232 Ga. 175 ( 205 SE2d 216 ) (1974). 5. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Redwine v. Frizzell
green
2 sentences1941Nothing contrary to what we now hold was ruled in Redwine v. Frizzell, 186 Ga. 296 ( 197 S. E. 805 ). 1941Nothing contrary to what we now hold was ruled in Redwine v. Frizzell, 186 Ga. 296 ( 197 S. E. 805 ). | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Cash v. Lowry
neutral
2 sentences1941In Cash v. Lowry, 91 Ga. 197 (2) ( 17 S. E. 121 ), the court held: “The evidence introduced at the hearing below consisting of numerous writings . . and the same not having been briefed or abstracted nor any attempt having been made to prepare a brief as distinguished from the evidence in full, and a large proportion of the contents of the papers being utterly immaterial, the act *392 above referred to is no more complied with by bringing up such a medley of material and immaterial matter than it would have been by omitting the evidence altogether.” (Italics ours.) It is therefore clear from t 1941In Cash v. Lowry, 91 Ga. 197 (2) ( 17 S. E. 121 ), the court held: “The evidence introduced at the hearing below consisting of numerous writings . . and the same not having been briefed or abstracted nor any attempt having been made to prepare a brief as distinguished from the evidence in full, and a large proportion of the contents of the papers being utterly immaterial, the act *392 above referred to is no more complied with by bringing up such a medley of material and immaterial matter than it would have been by omitting the evidence altogether.” (Italics ours.) It is therefore clear from t | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Silvey & Co. v. Brown
green
2 sentences1916Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ), and citations; Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 ( 72 S. E. 907 ); Barrow v. Barrow, 139 Ga. 806 ( 78 S. E. 123 ). 1916Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ), and citations; Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 ( 72 S. E. 907 ); Barrow v. Barrow, 139 Ga. 806 ( 78 S. E. 123 ). | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Barrow v. Barrow
neutral
2 sentences1916Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ), and citations; Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 ( 72 S. E. 907 ); Barrow v. Barrow, 139 Ga. 806 ( 78 S. E. 123 ). 1916Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 ( 66 S. E. 938 ), and citations; Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 ( 72 S. E. 907 ); Barrow v. Barrow, 139 Ga. 806 ( 78 S. E. 123 ). | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Miller v. Perkerson
green
2 sentences1914While under the authority of Miller v. Perkerson, 128 Ga. 465 ( 57 S. E. 787 ), construing § 5971 of the Civil Code, joint defendants who have paid an execution against themselves and another defendant, and procured a written transfer of it from the plaintiff in fi. fa., may enforce the execution against such other joint defendant for contribution, nevertheless where it appeared, from the evidence introduced on the hearing of an issue made by a party who interposed a claim as against the levy of the execution to enforce contribution, that at the time of the payment of the execution it was agre 1914While under the authority of Miller v. Perkerson, 128 Ga. 465 ( 57 S. E. 787 ), construing § 5971 of the Civil Code, joint defendants who have paid an execution against themselves and another defendant, and procured a written transfer of it from the plaintiff in fi. fa., may enforce the execution against such other joint defendant for contribution, nevertheless where it appeared, from the evidence introduced on the hearing of an issue made by a party who interposed a claim as against the levy of the execution to enforce contribution, that at the time of the payment of the execution it was agre | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Southern Mining Co. v. Brown
green
1 sentence1905Southern Mining Co. v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264 ; Pullen v. State, 116 Ga. 555. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Pullen v. State
neutral
1 sentence1905Southern Mining Co. v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264 ; Pullen v. State, 116 Ga. 555. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
| Whitehead Bros. v. Mundy neutral | 1 | 1896–1896 |
| Ryan v. Kingsbery green | 1 | 1893–1893 |
| Freeman v. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n neutral | 1 | 1893–1893 |
| Harris & Mitchell v. McArthur neutral | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.