Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thompkinsred2 sentences2007See, also, State v. Thompkins (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 380 , 387 . {¶ 27} The role of the appellate court is to engage in a limited weighing of the evidence introduced at the hearing in order to determine whether the state appropriately carried its burden of persuasion. 2007See, also, State v. Thompkins (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 380 , 387 . {¶ 9} The role of the appellate court is to engage in a limited weighing of the evidence introduced at the hearing in order to determine whether the state appropriately carried its burden of persuasion. | 4 | 4 |
Berish v. Berishgreen1 sentence2025Gilleo v. Gilleo, 2010-Ohio-5191, ¶ 21 , citing Berish v. Berish, 69 Ohio St.2d 318, 319 (1982). {¶56} In the instant case, the evidence introduced at the hearing established that Patrick owns a Cadillac Escalade, which he purchased in July of 2020. | 1 | 1 |
Auth v. Indus. Physical Capability Servs., Inc.green1 sentence2024See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bates & Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth
green
2 sentences2026In making its argument that the trial court could consider only the testimony and exhibits presented at the hearing, Talismanic relies on the following passage from Bates & Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth, 56 Ohio App.2d 223 (8th Dist. 1978): “If the trial court exercises its discretion and grants a hearing on the motion, any appeal taken from the court’s action thereon is not decided upon the material submitted with the motion but upon whether the evidence introduced at the hearing satisfies the three requirements of GTE.” Id. at 228 . 2026In making its argument that the trial court could consider only the testimony and exhibits presented at the hearing, Talismanic relies on the following passage from Bates & Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth, 56 Ohio App.2d 223 (8th Dist. 1978): “If the trial court exercises its discretion and grants a hearing on the motion, any appeal taken from the court’s action thereon is not decided upon the material submitted with the motion but upon whether the evidence introduced at the hearing satisfies the three requirements of GTE.” Id. at 228 . | 4 | 1984–2026 |
C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2009Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co . (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 279 . {¶ 13} The evidence introduced at the hearing supports the trial court's determination that Appellant was in contempt for violating the May 30, 2007, entry. 2008Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 279 . {¶ 20} The evidence introduced at hearing indicates Appellee sought and was granted an ex parte domestic violence civil protection order during the time she refused to return the children. | 2 | 2008–2009 |
Gilleo v. Gilleo
green
1 sentence2025Gilleo v. Gilleo, 2010-Ohio-5191, ¶ 21 , citing Berish v. Berish, 69 Ohio St.2d 318, 319 (1982). {¶56} In the instant case, the evidence introduced at the hearing established that Patrick owns a Cadillac Escalade, which he purchased in July of 2020. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State ex rel. Cable News Network, Inc. v. Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local Schools (Slip Opinion)
green
1 sentence2022Id. {¶26} In this case, the evidence introduced at the hearing showed that the entire security deposit was lawfully withheld and could be lawfully applied to Clark's past due rent. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Poss v. Morris, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2006)
green
1 sentence2006Accordingly, Appellant's first assignment of error is without merit. {¶ 32} Appellant's second assignment of error states: {¶ 33} "The decision of the magistrate, approved by the trial court, holding the Appellant in contempt was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence introduced at the hearing before the magistrate and, therefore, was an abuse of discretion." {¶ 34} Civil contempt has been defined as "that which exists in failing to do something ordered to be done by the court in a civil action for the benefit of the opposing party." Poss v. Morris, Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0093, 200 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Marden v. Marden
green
2 sentences2006Accordingly, Appellant's first assignment of error is without merit. {¶ 32} Appellant's second assignment of error states: {¶ 33} "The decision of the magistrate, approved by the trial court, holding the Appellant in contempt was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence introduced at the hearing before the magistrate and, therefore, was an abuse of discretion." {¶ 34} Civil contempt has been defined as "that which exists in failing to do something ordered to be done by the court in a civil action for the benefit of the opposing party." Poss v. Morris, Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0093, 200 2006Accordingly, Appellant's first assignment of error is without merit. {¶ 32} Appellant's second assignment of error states: {¶ 33} "The decision of the magistrate, approved by the trial court, holding the Appellant in contempt was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence introduced at the hearing before the magistrate and, therefore, was an abuse of discretion." {¶ 34} Civil contempt has been defined as "that which exists in failing to do something ordered to be done by the court in a civil action for the benefit of the opposing party." Poss v. Morris, Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0093, 200 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State ex rel. Hayburn v. Kiefer
neutral
2 sentences1996Hayburn v. Kiefer (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 132, 134 , 624 N.E.2d 699, 701 . {¶ 9} The evidence introduced at the hearing indicates that Hawkins directed the actions of others when he was a patrolman, deputy sheriff, and security supervisor. 1996Hayburn v. Kiefer (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 132, 134 , 624 N.E.2d 699, 701 . {¶ 9} The evidence introduced at the hearing indicates that Hawkins directed the actions of others when he was a patrolman, deputy sheriff, and security supervisor. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.