evidence introduced hearing in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1867–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Henry v. Stategreen alacrimapp · 1984 · cited in 2 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1998–2003 2 sentences 2003See, e.g., Henry v. State , 468 So.2d 896 , 899 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984); United States v. Smith , 527 F.2d 692 , 694 (10th Cir. 1975) (`In passing on the correctness of the trial court's denial of [the defendant's] motion to suppress, we are not limited to a consideration of just the evidence introduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress. 1998See, e.g., Henry v. State , 468 So.2d 896 , 899 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984); United States v. Smith , 527 F.2d 692 , 694 (10th Cir. 1975) ("In passing on the correctness of the trial court's denial of [the defendant's] motion to suppress, we are not limited to a consideration of just the evidence introduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress.	2	2
Price v. State.green ala · 1998 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003In addition thereto, we may also consider the evidence adduced at trial, even though such may not have been presented at the pretrial suppression hearing.')." 725 So.2d at 1067-68 (footnote omitted).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

Case	Cited	Years
United States v. Charles Harold Smith green ca10 · 1975 2 sentences 2003See, e.g., Henry v. State , 468 So.2d 896 , 899 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984); United States v. Smith , 527 F.2d 692 , 694 (10th Cir. 1975) (`In passing on the correctness of the trial court's denial of [the defendant's] motion to suppress, we are not limited to a consideration of just the evidence introduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress. 1998See, e.g., Henry v. State , 468 So.2d 896 , 899 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984); United States v. Smith , 527 F.2d 692 , 694 (10th Cir. 1975) ("In passing on the correctness of the trial court's denial of [the defendant's] motion to suppress, we are not limited to a consideration of just the evidence introduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress.	2	1998–2003
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REG., ETC. v. Hyman green fla · 1982 1 sentence 1998In Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering v. Hyman, 417 So.2d 671 (Fla. 1982), the Florida Supreme Court rejected a lower court's construction of § 120.59 as invalid per se and concluded that an agency's violation of the 90-day provision in § 120.59(1) did not make the agency's final order invalid unless the delay impaired the fairness of the proceeding or the correctness of the action, thereby resulting in prejudice to the adverse party.	1	1998–1998
Ex parte Spears neutral ala · 1956 2 sentences 1971The certificate of the trial judge recites: “ * * * the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on November 21, 1967; and that the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on October 23, 1970, to establish a statement in lieu of the transcript of the evidence introduced at the hearing on said motion for new trial on January 4, 1968, and the judge’s ruling thereon. * * We are of opinion that it is clear from the following cases that the trial court had 1971The certificate of the trial judge recites: “ * * * the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on November 21, 1967; and that the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on October 23, 1970, to establish a statement in lieu of the transcript of the evidence introduced at the hearing on said motion for new trial on January 4, 1968, and the judge’s ruling thereon. * * We are of opinion that it is clear from the following cases that the trial court had	1	1971–1971
State Farm Mutual Insurance Company v. Senn green ala · 1965 2 sentences 1971The certificate of the trial judge recites: “ * * * the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on November 21, 1967; and that the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on October 23, 1970, to establish a statement in lieu of the transcript of the evidence introduced at the hearing on said motion for new trial on January 4, 1968, and the judge’s ruling thereon. * * We are of opinion that it is clear from the following cases that the trial court had 1971The certificate of the trial judge recites: “ * * * the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on November 21, 1967; and that the foregoing transcript contains a full, complete, and correct statement of the evidence introduced at said hearing on October 23, 1970, to establish a statement in lieu of the transcript of the evidence introduced at the hearing on said motion for new trial on January 4, 1968, and the judge’s ruling thereon. * * We are of opinion that it is clear from the following cases that the trial court had	1	1971–1971
McReynolds v. Jones neutral · 1857 1 sentence 1867The party excepting must affirmatively show error, to entitle himself to a reversal of the action of the inferior court .—McRey nolds v. Jones, 30 Ala. 101 ; School Commissioners v. Goodwin, 30 Ala. 242 .	1	1867–1867
Doe ex dem. School Commissioners v. Godwin neutral ala · 1857 1 sentence 1867The party excepting must affirmatively show error, to entitle himself to a reversal of the action of the inferior court .—McRey nolds v. Jones, 30 Ala. 101 ; School Commissioners v. Goodwin, 30 Ala. 242 .	1	1867–1867
Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator neutral ala · 1859 1 sentence 1867Co. v. Holcombe, 35 Ala. 327 ; Henley v. Lee, at January term, 1867; Kirksey v. Hardaway, at present term.	1	1867–1867

Where else courts name it

GA 34 (1893–2012) TX 33 (1919–2023) CA 23 (1911–2023) IL 19 (1929–2023) OH 15 (1984–2026) NY 12 (1979–2023) LA 10 (1981–2014) WA 8 (1906–2018) FL 8 (1955–2023) NC 8 (1963–2012) PA 8 (1958–2023) TN 7 (1969–2016) NE 6 (1895–2020) AL 5 (1867–2003) OK 5 (1927–1992) IA 4 (1951–2021) NM 4 (1999–2013) MI 4 (2016–2024) CO 4 (1933–2018) MA 4 (1917–2018) MO 3 (1907–1984) IN 3 (1921–1993) VI 3 (2014–2016) DE 2 (2023–2025) SD 2 (1980–1980) NJ 2 (1988–1991) AZ 2 (1973–2015) VT 2 (1976–2025) KS 2 (1904–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check