Jencks rule (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

Jencks rule in Minnesota

5 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1966–1985 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Thompsongreen
minn · 1966 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
2 sentences

1985We noted in Thompson that although the *506 state should have disclosed information under the Jencks principle, no substantial prejudice to the defendant resulted because the trial court had examined the prior statement of the witness that should have been disclosed to the defendants and determined that it did not conflict with the witness’ testimony on direct examination. 273 Minn. at 32, 139 N.W.2d at 512 .

1985If the prosecution objects to the statement on the ground of relevancy, the court, in camera, will decide whether the statement is relevant; and if it finds that the whole or a part thereof is not relevant to the testimony of the witness, it shall excise such part as is not relevant, retaining it, however, as a part of the record so that upon review the correctness of the court’s ruling may be determined. 273 Minn. at 31-32, 139 N.W.2d at 512 (footnote omitted).

11
Mabry v. Stategreen
alactapp · 1959 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11
In Re Waltreusgreen
cal · 1965 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966See, State v. Foster, 242 Ore. 101 , 407 P. (2d) 901 . 6 In re Waltreus, 62 Cal. (2d) 218, 42 Cal. Rptr. 9 , 397 P. (2d) 1001 ; People v. Wolff, 19 Ill. (2d) 318, 167 N. E. (2d) 197; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 (dissent); People v. Rosario, 9 N. Y. (2d) 286, 213 N. Y.

1966See, State v. Foster, 242 Ore. 101 , 407 P. (2d) 901 . 6 In re Waltreus, 62 Cal. (2d) 218, 42 Cal. Rptr. 9 , 397 P. (2d) 1001 ; People v. Wolff, 19 Ill. (2d) 318, 167 N. E. (2d) 197; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 (dissent); People v. Rosario, 9 N. Y. (2d) 286, 213 N. Y.

11
State v. Fostergreen
or · 1965 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966See, State v. Foster, 242 Ore. 101 , 407 P. (2d) 901 . 6 In re Waltreus, 62 Cal. (2d) 218, 42 Cal. Rptr. 9 , 397 P. (2d) 1001 ; People v. Wolff, 19 Ill. (2d) 318, 167 N. E. (2d) 197; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 (dissent); People v. Rosario, 9 N. Y. (2d) 286, 213 N. Y.

1966See, State v. Foster, 242 Ore. 101 , 407 P. (2d) 901 . 6 In re Waltreus, 62 Cal. (2d) 218, 42 Cal. Rptr. 9 , 397 P. (2d) 1001 ; People v. Wolff, 19 Ill. (2d) 318, 167 N. E. (2d) 197; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 (dissent); People v. Rosario, 9 N. Y. (2d) 286, 213 N. Y.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (22)

CaseCitedYears
Walker v. State green
nev · 1962
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

21966–1966
Jencks v. United States green
scotus · 1957
2 sentences

1973See, 18 USCA, § 3500; Jencks v. United States, 353 U. S. 657 , 77 S. Ct. 1007 , 1 L. ed. 2d 1103 (1957).

1973See, 18 USCA, § 3500; Jencks v. United States, 353 U. S. 657 , 77 S. Ct. 1007 , 1 L. ed. 2d 1103 (1957).

11973–1973
United States v. Augenblick green
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1973United States v. Augenblick, 393 U. S. 348, 356 , 89 S. Ct. 528, 533 , 21 L. ed. 2d 537, 545 (1969).

1973United States v. Augenblick, 393 U. S. 348, 356 , 89 S. Ct. 528, 533 , 21 L. ed. 2d 537, 545 (1969).

11973–1973
State v. Grunau green
minn · 1966
2 sentences

1967In State v. Grunau, 273 Minn. 315 , 141 N. W. (2d) 815 , filed March 18, 1966, it was held that this so-called “Jencks rule” should be applied to cases coming to this court on appeal where the judgment has not *304 become final and the record has been protected, if failure to do so will result in substantial prejudice to the defendant.

1967In State v. Grunau, 273 Minn. 315 , 141 N. W. (2d) 815 , filed March 18, 1966, it was held that this so-called “Jencks rule” should be applied to cases coming to this court on appeal where the judgment has not *304 become final and the record has been protected, if failure to do so will result in substantial prejudice to the defendant.

11967–1967
Anderson v. State green
tenn · 1960
2 sentences

1966State v. Kelly, 249 Iowa 1219 , 91 N. W. (2d) 562 ; Anderson v. State, 207 Tenn. 486 , 341 S.W. (2d) 385 .

1966State v. Kelly, 249 Iowa 1219 , 91 N. W. (2d) 562 ; Anderson v. State, 207 Tenn. 486 , 341 S.W. (2d) 385 .

11966–1966
State v. Hutchins green
delsuperct · 1957
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

11966–1966
Commonwealth v. Smith green
pa · 1963
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

11966–1966
Erving v. State green
neb · 1962
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
Anderson v. State green
ind · 1959
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
State v. Kelly green
iowa · 1958
2 sentences

1966State v. Kelly, 249 Iowa 1219 , 91 N. W. (2d) 562 ; Anderson v. State, 207 Tenn. 486 , 341 S.W. (2d) 385 .

1966State v. Kelly, 249 Iowa 1219 , 91 N. W. (2d) 562 ; Anderson v. State, 207 Tenn. 486 , 341 S.W. (2d) 385 .

11966–1966
People v. Chapman green
cal · 1959
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

11966–1966
State v. Robinson green
wash · 1962
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
State v. Saenz green
ariz · 1960
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

11966–1966
McKenzie v. State green
md · 1964
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
State v. Pikul green
conn · 1962
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
Chandler v. State green
or · 1962
2 sentences

1966State v. Morgan, 67 N. Mex. 287, 354 P. (2d) 1002 ; Chandler v. State, 230 Ore. 452 , 370 P. (2d) 626 .

1966State v. Morgan, 67 N. Mex. 287, 354 P. (2d) 1002 ; Chandler v. State, 230 Ore. 452 , 370 P. (2d) 626 .

11966–1966
Gaskin v. State green
texcrimapp · 1961
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
State v. Morgan green
nm · 1960
2 sentences

1966State v. Morgan, 67 N. Mex. 287, 354 P. (2d) 1002 ; Chandler v. State, 230 Ore. 452 , 370 P. (2d) 626 .

1966State v. Morgan, 67 N. Mex. 287, 354 P. (2d) 1002 ; Chandler v. State, 230 Ore. 452 , 370 P. (2d) 626 .

11966–1966
State v. Lavallee green
vt · 1960
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

11966–1966
State v. Richards green
wis · 1963
2 sentences

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

1966State v. Saenz, 88 Ariz. 154 , 353 P. (2d) 1026 ; People v. Chapman, 52 Cal. (2d) 95, 338 P. (2d) 428 ; State v. Hutchins, 51 Del. 100 , 138 A. (2d) 342; Walker v. State, 78 Nev. 463 , 376 P. (2d) 137 ; State v. Hunt, 25 N. J. 514, 138 A. (2d) 1; Commonwealth v. Smith, 412 Pa. 1 , 192 A. (2d) 671; State v. Lavallee, 122 Vt. 75 , 163 A. (2d) 856; State v. Richards, 21 Wis. (2d) 622, 124 N. W. (2d) 684 .

11966–1966
State v. Hill green
kan · 1964
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966
State v. Aubuchon green
mo · 1964
2 sentences

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

1966See, Mabry v. State, 40 Ala. App. 129 , 110 So. (2d) 250 ; State v. Pikul, 150 Conn. 195 , 187 A. (2d) 442; Anderson v. State, 239 Ind. 372 , 156 N. E. (2d) 384; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. (2d) 106 ; McKenzie v. State, 236 Md. 597 , 204 A. (2d) 678; State v. Aubuchon (Mo.) 381 S. W. (2d) 807 ; Erving v. State, 174 Neb. 90 , 116 N. W. (2d) 7 ; Gaskin v. State, 172 Tex. Cr. 7, 353 S. W. (2d) 467 ; State v. Robinson, 61 Wash. (2d) 107, 377 P. (2d) 248 .

11966–1966

Where else courts name it

DC 20 (1974–2016) DE 6 (1980–2018) MN 5 (1966–1985) CT 4 (1974–1992) TN 3 (1993–2013) TX 3 (1963–1995) MD 3 (1981–1999) WV 2 (1978–1982) CA 2 (1965–2009) PR 2 (1961–1967)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check