Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McDonaldgreen2 sentences2020Id. at 193 , 662 S.E.2d at 691 (internal alterations, citations, and marks omitted). “[I]n order to pass constitutional muster, [ ] orders [on motions to suppress in the checkpoint context] must contain findings and conclusions sufficient to demonstrate that the trial court has meaningfully applied the three prongs of the test articulated in Brown.” McDonald, 239 N.C. App. at 571, 768 S.E.2d at 921. 2020Id. at 193 , 662 S.E.2d at 691 (internal alterations, citations, and marks omitted). “[I]n order to pass constitutional muster, [ ] orders [on motions to suppress in the checkpoint context] must contain findings and conclusions sufficient to demonstrate that the trial court has meaningfully applied the three prongs of the test articulated in Brown.” McDonald, 239 N.C. App. at 571, 768 S.E.2d at 921. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Veazeygreen2 sentences2020Id. at 193 , 662 S.E.2d at 691 (internal alterations, citations, and marks omitted). “[I]n order to pass constitutional muster, [ ] orders [on motions to suppress in the checkpoint context] must contain findings and conclusions sufficient to demonstrate that the trial court has meaningfully applied the three prongs of the test articulated in Brown.” McDonald, 239 N.C. App. at 571, 768 S.E.2d at 921. 2020Id. at 193 , 662 S.E.2d at 691 (internal alterations, citations, and marks omitted). “[I]n order to pass constitutional muster, [ ] orders [on motions to suppress in the checkpoint context] must contain findings and conclusions sufficient to demonstrate that the trial court has meaningfully applied the three prongs of the test articulated in Brown.” McDonald, 239 N.C. App. at 571, 768 S.E.2d at 921. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Trustees of Durham Technical Community Collegegreen2 sentences2017See generally Johnson , 139 N.C.App. 676 , 684-85, 535 S.E.2d 357 , 363. 5 One of petitioner's arguments is that her exposure to light in the workplace actually "aggravated" her light sensitivity, so that respondent's failure to find the right accommodation earlier in the process worsened her condition. 2017See generally Johnson , 139 N.C.App. 676 , 684-85, 535 S.E.2d 357 , 363. 5 One of petitioner's arguments is that her exposure to light in the workplace actually "aggravated" her light sensitivity, so that respondent's failure to find the right accommodation earlier in the process worsened her condition. | 1 | 1 |
cluster 750710green1 sentence2004While it is true that Sedlack described the three prongs of its test as “three elements [that] must always be satisfied,” Sedlack, 134 F.3d at 224, the United States Supreme Court in New Hampshire v. Maine emphasized that because the doctrine is a flexible, equitable one, “ ‘the circumstances under which judicial estoppel may appropriately be invoked are probably not reducible to any general formulation of principle.’ ” New Hampshire, 532 U.S. at 750 , 149 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Texas
green
2 sentences2020I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s resolution of Defendant’s constitutional issue because the trial court’s order made findings of fact sufficient to permit appellate review and the trial court correctly addressed “the three prongs of the test articulated in Brown [v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)].” State v. McDonald, 239 N.C. App. 559 , 571, 768 S.E.2d 913 , 921 (2015). 2020I respectfully dissent as to the majority’s resolution of Defendant’s constitutional issue because the trial court’s order made findings of fact sufficient to permit appellate review and the trial court correctly addressed “the three prongs of the test articulated in Brown [v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)].” State v. McDonald, 239 N.C. App. 559 , 571, 768 S.E.2d 913 , 921 (2015). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Goode
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
New Hampshire v. Maine
green
2 sentences2004While it is true that Sedlack described the three prongs of its test as “three elements [that] must always be satisfied,” Sedlack, 134 F.3d at 224, the United States Supreme Court in New Hampshire v. Maine emphasized that because the doctrine is a flexible, equitable one, “ ‘the circumstances under which judicial estoppel may appropriately be invoked are probably not reducible to any general formulation of principle.’ ” New Hampshire, 532 U.S. at 750 , 149 L. 2004While it is true that Sedlack described the three prongs of its test as “three elements [that] must always be satisfied,” Sedlack, 134 F.3d at 224, the United States Supreme Court in New Hampshire v. Maine emphasized that because the doctrine is a flexible, equitable one, “ ‘the circumstances under which judicial estoppel may appropriately be invoked are probably not reducible to any general formulation of principle.’ ” New Hampshire, 532 U.S. at 750 , 149 L. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.