Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Curro v. Watsongreen2 sentences2008Contrary to defendant’s final contention, the procedure for correcting transcripts pursuant to CPLR 5525 (c) complies with the requirements of due process (see Burrell v Swartz, 558 F Supp 91, 92 [1983]; see also Curro v Watson, 884 F Supp 708, 718 [1995], affd for reasons stated 100 F3d 942 [1996]). 2008Contrary to defendant’s final contention, the procedure for correcting transcripts pursuant to CPLR 5525 (c) complies with the requirements of due process (see Burrell v Swartz, 558 F Supp 91, 92 [1983]; see also Curro v Watson, 884 F Supp 708, 718 [1995], affd for reasons stated 100 F3d 942 [1996]). | 1 | 1 |
Burrell v. Swartzgreen1 sentence2008Contrary to defendant’s final contention, the procedure for correcting transcripts pursuant to CPLR 5525 (c) complies with the requirements of due process (see Burrell v Swartz, 558 F Supp 91, 92 [1983]; see also Curro v Watson, 884 F Supp 708, 718 [1995], affd for reasons stated 100 F3d 942 [1996]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Forest Hills Gardens Corp. v. Kamp
neutral
1 sentence2026Furthermore, since there have been no personal appearances in this action, and the court considers all motions on papers only, without oral argument, as it is permitted to do (see Niagara Venture v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, 56 AD3d 1150 , 1150 [4th Dept 2008]; see also 22 NYCRR 202.8[d] [oral argument is at the discretion of judge]; Forest Hills Gardens Corp. v Kamp, 171 Misc 2d 334 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 1997]; Mingla v City of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 30162[U] , *16 [Sup Ct, N.Y. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Brandenburg v. Brandenburg
green
1 sentence2017Civil Court correctly denied the motion, noting that where a transcript or portion thereof is unavailable, plaintiff's remedy is to pursue the appeal after preparing and settling a statement in lieu of transcript pursuant to CPLR 5525(d) ( see Brandenburg v Brandenburg , 188 AD2d 368 [1992]). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Conklin v. Rogers
green
1 sentence2010As an initial matter, we reject petitioner’s argument that dismissal is necessary because respondents failed to include in the appellate record either a transcript of the oral argument on respondents’ motion to vacate the default judgment or a statement in lieu of the transcript pursuant to CPLR 5525 (d) (see CPLR 5526; Matter of Conklin v Rogers, 98 AD2d 918 [1983], lv granted 61 NY2d 608 [1984]). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Cassella v. Manikas
neutral
1 sentence1992The Trial Judge’s recollection may be supplemented or aided by affidavits offered by the parties after notice of settlement is given, but it is her recollection that must ultimately control (Cassella v Manikas, 8 AD2d 587 ). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.