factual and legal analysis (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

factual and legal analysis in Ohio

5 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
University of Cincinnati v. Conradgreen
ohio · 1980 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026Id., citing Univ. of Cincinnati v. Conrad, 63 Ohio St.2d 108, 111 (1980).

11
Shaffer v. Measegreen
ohioctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000See Shaffer v. Mease (1991), 66 Ohio App.3d 400 , 409 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Cleveland v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion) green
ohio · 2020
1 sentence

2026With the exception of a required surplus to maintain solvency, R.C. 4123.321 requires the BWC to establish a procedure for returning excess premiums to participating employers in order to maintain a revenue-neutral fund.” CPC I at ¶ 4, quoting Cleveland v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp., 2020-Ohio-337, ¶ 3-4 . {¶ 15} And, as directly pertinent to this appeal, in CPC I, this court detailed the factual and legal framework of appellants’ equal protection claims against BWC as follows: The State Fund is intended to be revenue neutral—i.e., the BWC charges Ohio employers only those premium amounts tha

12026–2026
State v. Sidebeh green
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2016No. 15AP-524 7 {¶ 23} In State v. Sidibeh, 192 Ohio App.3d 256 , 2011-Ohio-712 (10th Dist.), the defendant restrained the liberty of the occupants of a home while others rummaged through the house.

12016–2016
Anania v. Daubenspeck Chiropractic green
ohioctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2002According to Ohio law, there are five elements of a claim of sexual harassment/hostile work environment: `(1) the employee was a member of the protected class; (2) the employee was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) the harassment complained of was based upon sex; (4) the harassment had the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with the employee's work performance or creating an intimidating hostile, or offensive work environment; and (5) the existence of respondeat superior liability.' Id. at 521 . {¶ 17} "The Court may not make credibility determinations, weigh evidence or draw i

2002The trial court erred and abused its discretion by granting the Defendant-appellees' motion for summary judgment on the issue of retaliation and reprisal claims. {¶ 11} "1) As to Plaintiff-appellant's harassment and eventual termination in the wake of her utilization of intermittent family and medical leave to care for ailing children. {¶ 12} "2) As to Plaintiff-appellant's Termination in the wake of signing a union affiliation card. {¶ 13} "3) As to Plaintiff-appellant's denial of a return to her original job classification as ordered by the Beavercreek board of personnel appeals, the assignm

12002–2002

Where else courts name it

GA 7 (2024–2026) OH 5 (2000–2026) WA 4 (2013–2024) CT 4 (1997–2022) OR 3 (2014–2021) PA 3 (2018–2024) RI 3 (1990–2003) IA 2 (1984–1988)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check