Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1935–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Tulsa v. Langleygreen1 sentence1997See, e.g., City of Tulsa v. Langley, 168 P.2d 116 (Okla. 1946) (upholding long term agreement for provision of legal services); City of Wewoka v. Billingsley, 331 P.2d 949 (Okla. 1958) (upholding 10-year lease agreement where city agreed to pay private company one-half of all revenue collected from usage of water lines). ¶ 16 For example, if the terms of the contract do not obligate the municipality to expend any of its funds or revenue derived from ad valorem taxation or otherwise, and instead only provides that the municipality will turn over some portion of the funds collected from resident | 1 | 1 |
City of Wewoka Ex Rel. Culp v. Billingsleygreen2 sentences1997See City of Wewoka v. Billingsley, 331 P.2d 949 , 953 (Okla. 1958). 1997See, e.g., City of Tulsa v. Langley, 168 P.2d 116 (Okla. 1946) (upholding long term agreement for provision of legal services); City of Wewoka v. Billingsley, 331 P.2d 949 (Okla. 1958) (upholding 10-year lease agreement where city agreed to pay private company one-half of all revenue collected from usage of water lines). ¶ 16 For example, if the terms of the contract do not obligate the municipality to expend any of its funds or revenue derived from ad valorem taxation or otherwise, and instead only provides that the municipality will turn over some portion of the funds collected from resident | 1 | 1 |
Faught v. City of Sapulpagreen2 sentences1993See Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okl. 164 , 292 P. 15 (1930) (a debt under Section 26 exists when a contractual obligation is created). 1993See Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okl. 164 , 292 P. 15 (1930) (a debt under Section 26 exists when a contractual obligation is created). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Zachary v. City of Wagoner
neutral
2 sentences1966In Burch v. City of Pauls Valley et al., 201 Okl. 78 , 201 P.2d 247 , this court in holding unconstitutional an act which authorized incorporated cities and towns, without any vote of the people of the city or town, to incur indebtedness which could be in excess of the debt limit specified in Section 26 of Article 10 of the Constitution for the construction, etc., of water and/or sewer facilities to be secured only by a pledge of revenue from such system or systems quoted from the syllabus to Zachery v. City of Wagoner, 146 Okl. 268 , 292 P. 345, 346 , as follows: “The provisions of sections 2 1966In Burch v. City of Pauls Valley et al., 201 Okl. 78 , 201 P.2d 247 , this court in holding unconstitutional an act which authorized incorporated cities and towns, without any vote of the people of the city or town, to incur indebtedness which could be in excess of the debt limit specified in Section 26 of Article 10 of the Constitution for the construction, etc., of water and/or sewer facilities to be secured only by a pledge of revenue from such system or systems quoted from the syllabus to Zachery v. City of Wagoner, 146 Okl. 268 , 292 P. 345, 346 , as follows: “The provisions of sections 2 | 2 | 1936–1966 |
City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.
green
2 sentences1936In the case of City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Company, 118 Okla. 201 , 248 P. 336 , this court held: “The debt limit provisions of section 26, article 10, of the state Constitution do not apply to an incorporated city in the operation of a public utility owned exclusively by such city.” The immediate question for determination in that case was whether it was necessary for the city council and excise board to set up estimates and appropriations out of the utility revenues, and it was not necessary for the court to say (and it did not undertake to say) what limitations did control with r 1936In the case of City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Company, 118 Okla. 201 , 248 P. 336 , this court held: “The debt limit provisions of section 26, article 10, of the state Constitution do not apply to an incorporated city in the operation of a public utility owned exclusively by such city.” The immediate question for determination in that case was whether it was necessary for the city council and excise board to set up estimates and appropriations out of the utility revenues, and it was not necessary for the court to say (and it did not undertake to say) what limitations did control with r | 2 | 1935–1936 |
Burch v. City of Pauls Valley
neutral
2 sentences1966In Burch v. City of Pauls Valley et al., 201 Okl. 78 , 201 P.2d 247 , this court in holding unconstitutional an act which authorized incorporated cities and towns, without any vote of the people of the city or town, to incur indebtedness which could be in excess of the debt limit specified in Section 26 of Article 10 of the Constitution for the construction, etc., of water and/or sewer facilities to be secured only by a pledge of revenue from such system or systems quoted from the syllabus to Zachery v. City of Wagoner, 146 Okl. 268 , 292 P. 345, 346 , as follows: “The provisions of sections 2 1966In Burch v. City of Pauls Valley et al., 201 Okl. 78 , 201 P.2d 247 , this court in holding unconstitutional an act which authorized incorporated cities and towns, without any vote of the people of the city or town, to incur indebtedness which could be in excess of the debt limit specified in Section 26 of Article 10 of the Constitution for the construction, etc., of water and/or sewer facilities to be secured only by a pledge of revenue from such system or systems quoted from the syllabus to Zachery v. City of Wagoner, 146 Okl. 268 , 292 P. 345, 346 , as follows: “The provisions of sections 2 | 1 | 1966–1966 |