credited defense (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

credited defense in Oregon

5 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2026–2026 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Smithgreen
or · 2005 · cited in 3 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026See Smith, 339 Or at 531 (the trial court credited defense counsel’s statement that he was prepared for trial and concluded that the defendant had not demonstrated a legitimate reason for the court to appoint substitute counsel).

2026See Smith, 339 Or at 531 (the trial court credited defense counsel’s statement that he was prepared for trial and concluded that the defendant had not demonstrated a legitimate reason for the court to appoint substitute counsel).

33
Farmer v. Premogreen
or · 2018 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026“The Oregon Constitution does not give a criminal defendant the right to a perfect defense, but ‘it requires that the lawyer do those things reasonably necessary to diligently and conscientiously advance the defense.’ ” Stevens v. State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995). “[T]he exercise of reasonable professional skill and judgment generally requires an investigation that is legally and factually appropriate to the nature and complexity of the case so that the lawyer is equipped to advise and represent the client in an informed manner.” Id.; accord Farmer v. Premo, 363 Or 679, 6

2026“The Oregon Constitution does not give a criminal defendant the right to a perfect defense, but ‘it requires that the lawyer do those things reasonably necessary to diligently and conscientiously advance the defense.’ ” Stevens v. State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995). “[T]he exercise of reasonable professional skill and judgment generally requires an investigation that is legally and factually appropriate to the nature and complexity of the case so that the lawyer is equipped to advise and represent the client in an informed manner.” Id.; accord Farmer v. Premo, 363 Or 679, 6

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Stevens v. State green
or · 1995
2 sentences

2026“The Oregon Constitution does not give a criminal defendant the right to a perfect defense, but ‘it requires that the lawyer do those things reasonably necessary to diligently and conscientiously advance the defense.’ ” Stevens v. State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995). “[T]he exercise of reasonable professional skill and judgment generally requires an investigation that is legally and factually appropriate to the nature and complexity of the case so that the lawyer is equipped to advise and represent the client in an informed manner.” Id.; accord Farmer v. Premo, 363 Or 679, 6

2026“The Oregon Constitution does not give a criminal defendant the right to a perfect defense, but ‘it requires that the lawyer do those things reasonably necessary to diligently and conscientiously advance the defense.’ ” Stevens v. State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995). “[T]he exercise of reasonable professional skill and judgment generally requires an investigation that is legally and factually appropriate to the nature and complexity of the case so that the lawyer is equipped to advise and represent the client in an informed manner.” Id.; accord Farmer v. Premo, 363 Or 679, 6

22026–2026

Where else courts name it

OR 5 (2026–2026) NY 4 (2002–2020) MI 3 (2017–2026) PA 2 (1986–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check