Oregon Constitution requires Miranda warning (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

Oregon Constitution requires Miranda warning in Oregon

5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Vondehngreen
or · 2010 · cited in 4 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2015–2026
2 sentences

2026Vondehn, 348 Or at 480 (“The Oregon Constitution requires Miranda warnings to ensure that a waiver of the rights conferred by Article I, section 12, is knowing as well as voluntary.”).

2025The Oregon Constitution requires Miranda warnings to ensure that a waiver of the *313 rights conferred by Article I, section 12, is knowing as well as voluntary.” Vondehn, 348 Or at 480 .

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Magee green
or · 1987
2 sentences

2004The Oregon Supreme Court *170 has held that Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution requires Miranda warnings when a suspect is in “full custody’ or in a “setting that judges would and officers should recognize to be compelling.” State v. Magee, 304 Or 261, 265 , 744 P2d 250 (1987).

2004The Oregon Supreme Court *170 has held that Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution requires Miranda warnings when a suspect is in “full custody’ or in a “setting that judges would and officers should recognize to be compelling.” State v. Magee, 304 Or 261, 265 , 744 P2d 250 (1987).

12004–2004
State v. Wandle green
orctapp · 1985
2 sentences

2004Whether “full custody’ or “compelling” circumstances are at issue, the relevant inquiry is “ ‘how a reasonable [person] in the suspect’s position would have understood his [or her] situation.’ ” State v. Dinsmore, 182 Or App 505, 514 , 49 P3d 830 (2002) (quoting State v. Wandle, 75 Or App 746, 750 , 707 P2d 1281 (1985), rev den, 300 Or 605 , cert den, 479 US 888 (1986) (brackets in Dinsmore)).

2004Whether “full custody’ or “compelling” circumstances are at issue, the relevant inquiry is “ ‘how a reasonable [person] in the suspect’s position would have understood his [or her] situation.’ ” State v. Dinsmore, 182 Or App 505, 514 , 49 P3d 830 (2002) (quoting State v. Wandle, 75 Or App 746, 750 , 707 P2d 1281 (1985), rev den, 300 Or 605 , cert den, 479 US 888 (1986) (brackets in Dinsmore)).

12004–2004
Wandle v. Oregon green
scotus · 1986
1 sentence

2004Whether “full custody’ or “compelling” circumstances are at issue, the relevant inquiry is “ ‘how a reasonable [person] in the suspect’s position would have understood his [or her] situation.’ ” State v. Dinsmore, 182 Or App 505, 514 , 49 P3d 830 (2002) (quoting State v. Wandle, 75 Or App 746, 750 , 707 P2d 1281 (1985), rev den, 300 Or 605 , cert den, 479 US 888 (1986) (brackets in Dinsmore)).

12004–2004
State v. Dinsmore green
orctapp · 2002
2 sentences

2004Whether “full custody’ or “compelling” circumstances are at issue, the relevant inquiry is “ ‘how a reasonable [person] in the suspect’s position would have understood his [or her] situation.’ ” State v. Dinsmore, 182 Or App 505, 514 , 49 P3d 830 (2002) (quoting State v. Wandle, 75 Or App 746, 750 , 707 P2d 1281 (1985), rev den, 300 Or 605 , cert den, 479 US 888 (1986) (brackets in Dinsmore)).

2004Whether “full custody’ or “compelling” circumstances are at issue, the relevant inquiry is “ ‘how a reasonable [person] in the suspect’s position would have understood his [or her] situation.’ ” State v. Dinsmore, 182 Or App 505, 514 , 49 P3d 830 (2002) (quoting State v. Wandle, 75 Or App 746, 750 , 707 P2d 1281 (1985), rev den, 300 Or 605 , cert den, 479 US 888 (1986) (brackets in Dinsmore)).

12004–2004

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check