Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2024–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ryangreen2 sentences2025See State v. Ryan, 361 Or 602, 614-15 , 396 P3d 867 (2017) (court reviews constitutionality of a sentence for legal error under Article I, section 16). 3 Defendant contends that imposing the mandatory minimum sentence also would be unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which provides, “Excessive bail shall not be required, no excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” However, defendant does not develop an argument under the federal constitution that is independent of or distinct from her argument under the Oregon Constitutio 2025See State v. Ryan, 361 Or 602, 614-15 , 396 P3d 867 (2017) (court reviews constitutionality of a sentence for legal error under Article I, section 16). 3 Defendant contends that imposing the mandatory minimum sentence also would be unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which provides, “Excessive bail shall not be required, no excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” However, defendant does not develop an argument under the federal constitution that is independent of or distinct from her argument under the Oregon Constitutio | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Conrad
green
2 sentences2026State v. Conrad, 280 Or App 325, 333-34 , 381 P3d 880 (2016), rev den, 360 Or 851 (2017). 2026State v. Conrad, 280 Or App 325, 333-34 , 381 P3d 880 (2016), rev den, 360 Or 851 (2017). | 2 | 2024–2026 |
State v. Hurtado
green
2 sentences2026In the absence of express factual findings, we presume that the court resolved factual disputes consistently with its ultimate decision.” State v. Hurtado, 335 Or App 560, 572 , 558 P3d 1267 (2024), rev den, 373 Or 305 (2025) (citation omitted). 2026In the absence of express factual findings, we presume that the court resolved factual disputes consistently with its ultimate decision.” State v. Hurtado, 335 Or App 560, 572 , 558 P3d 1267 (2024), rev den, 373 Or 305 (2025) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.