Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Levygreen2 sentences2024See Commonwealth v. Levy, 83 A.3d 457, 467 (Pa. Super. 2013) (concluding that appellant’s failure to file a post-sentence motion or raise the claim at the sentencing hearing rendered his discretionary aspects of sentencing challenge waived). 5 ____________________________________________ 4 We note Neal filed an untimely motion to reconsider and modify his sentence on December 13, 2023, thirty days after the imposition of his sentence. 2024See Commonwealth v. Levy, 83 A.3d 457, 467 (Pa. Super. 2013) (concluding that appellant’s failure to file a post-sentence motion after resentencing or raise the claim at the sentencing hearing rendered his discretionary aspects of sentencing challenge waived). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Littlehalesgreen1 sentence2026See Littlehales, 915 A.2d at 664-65 (“In order to challenge a discretionary aspect of a sentence the defendant must first raise the claim at the sentencing hearing or in post-sentence motions. - 32 - The record reflects that [Littlehales] raised this issue in post-sentence motions. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Wrecksgreen1 sentence2024However, “[a]n untimely post-sentence motion does not preserve issues on appeal.” Commonwealth v. Wrecks, 931 A.2d 717, 719 (Pa. Super. 2007) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Cartrettegreen1 sentence2020See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720; Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) (“[i]ssues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal”); Commonwealth v. Cartrette, 83 A.3d 1030, 1042 (Pa. Super. 2013) (en banc) (“issues challenging the discretionary aspects of a sentence must be raised in a post-sentence motion or by presenting the claim to the trial court during the sentencing proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2019Delaney, supra (citing Commonwealth v. Reaves, 592 Pa. 134 , 923 A.2d 1119, 1125 (2007); Commonwealth v. Williams, 787 A.2d 1085, 1088 (Pa.Super. 2010)). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Reavesgreen2 sentences2019Delaney, supra (citing Commonwealth v. Reaves, 592 Pa. 134 , 923 A.2d 1119, 1125 (2007); Commonwealth v. Williams, 787 A.2d 1085, 1088 (Pa.Super. 2010)). 2019Delaney, supra (citing Commonwealth v. Reaves, 592 Pa. 134 , 923 A.2d 1119, 1125 (2007); Commonwealth v. Williams, 787 A.2d 1085, 1088 (Pa.Super. 2010)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||