Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Joseph Palermo Development Corp. v. Bowersgreen1 sentence2024Id. at 997-98 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.red1 sentence2021Family Court’s Brief at 19-20 (citing Sylvan Heights, 940 A.2d at 588-89 , and noting this Court has held that legislative immunity includes immunity from defending litigation, see Consumer Party of Pa. v. Commonwealth, 507 A.2d 323, 331 (Pa. 1986), abrogated on other grounds, Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 877 A.2d 383 (Pa. 2005)). | 1 | 1 |
Hankin v. Hankingreen2 sentences1989See, Hankin v. Hankin, 338 Pa.Super. 442 , 487 A.2d 1363 ; Foukle v. Lavelle, 454 A.2d 56 , 308 Pa.Super. 131 (1982) An order opening judgment, as in the instant case, does not end the litigation, nor preclude participation by certain parties in the litigation, nor result in the irreparable loss of the claim. 1989See, Hankin v. Hankin, 338 Pa.Super. 442 , 487 A.2d 1363 ; Foukle v. Lavelle, 454 A.2d 56 , 308 Pa.Super. 131 (1982) An order opening judgment, as in the instant case, does not end the litigation, nor preclude participation by certain parties in the litigation, nor result in the irreparable loss of the claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.
green
1 sentence2026Wilson v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, 88 A.3d 237 , 245 n.10 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2013).10 Our sister intermediate appellate court has stated similarly that an “order opening [a confessed] judgment . . . does not end the litigation, nor preclude participation by certain parties in the litigation, nor result in the irreparable loss of the claim. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Johnson v. Jones
green
1 sentence2022This irreparable-loss requirement ensures that interlocutory review occurs [J-76-2021] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 5 only in cases of necessity, thereby reflecting a central tenet of the final order rule: Trial proceedings should not be delayed unnecessarily, and appellate courts should not review matters that, “had the trial simply proceeded, would have turned out to be unnecessary.” Johnson, 515 U.S. at 309 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Sylvan Heights Realty Partners, L.L.C. v. LaGrotta
green
2 sentences2021Family Court’s Brief at 19-20 (citing Sylvan Heights, 940 A.2d at 588-89 , and noting this Court has held that legislative immunity includes immunity from defending litigation, see Consumer Party of Pa. v. Commonwealth, 507 A.2d 323, 331 (Pa. 1986), abrogated on other grounds, Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 877 A.2d 383 (Pa. 2005)). 2021For instance, the Family Court contends that in Sylvan Heights Realty Partners, L.L.C. v. LaGrotta, 940 A.2d 585 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008), the court addressed the irreparable loss requirement in dicta only, after holding the issue of legislative immunity was not separate and collateral based on the facts of the case. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2021Family Court’s Brief at 19-20 (citing Sylvan Heights, 940 A.2d at 588-89 , and noting this Court has held that legislative immunity includes immunity from defending litigation, see Consumer Party of Pa. v. Commonwealth, 507 A.2d 323, 331 (Pa. 1986), abrogated on other grounds, Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 877 A.2d 383 (Pa. 2005)). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.
green
1 sentence2021After finding the order met the first two prongs of Rule 313, the Pridgen Court concluded it also satisfied the irreparable loss requirement because “the substantial cost that Appellants will incur in defending this complex litigation at a trial on the merits comprises a sufficient loss to support allowing interlocutory appellate review as of right, in light of the clear federal policy to contain such costs in the public interest.” Id. at 433 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Foulke v. Lavelle
green
2 sentences1989See, Hankin v. Hankin, 338 Pa.Super. 442 , 487 A.2d 1363 ; Foukle v. Lavelle, 454 A.2d 56 , 308 Pa.Super. 131 (1982) An order opening judgment, as in the instant case, does not end the litigation, nor preclude participation by certain parties in the litigation, nor result in the irreparable loss of the claim. 1989See, Hankin v. Hankin, 338 Pa.Super. 442 , 487 A.2d 1363 ; Foukle v. Lavelle, 454 A.2d 56 , 308 Pa.Super. 131 (1982) An order opening judgment, as in the instant case, does not end the litigation, nor preclude participation by certain parties in the litigation, nor result in the irreparable loss of the claim. | 1 | 1989–1989 |