34 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gallegos v. Stategreen2 sentences2009But that is not shown here as “[a] trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such a hearing.” Gallegos v. State, 76 S.W.3d 224, 228 (Tex.App.–Dallas 2002, pet. refused). 2009But that is not shown here as “[a] trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such a hearing.” Gallegos v. State, 76 S.W.3d 224, 228 (Tex.App.–Dallas 2002, pet. refused). | 7 | 7 |
Edwards v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Edwards v. State, 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State, 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.CTyler 1998, pet. ref=d) (Aa trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested@); Brooks v. State, 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.CTyler 1995, no pet.) (Athe trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing@); Martin v. State, 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 1992), pet. ref=d, 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Edwards v. State , 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State , 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1998, pet. ref'd) ("a trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested"); Brooks v. State , 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1995, no pet.) ("the trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing"); Martin v. State , 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1992), pet. ref'd , 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. | 5 | 5 |
Estate of Pollack v. McMurreygreen2 sentences2005See Estate of Pollack v. McMurrey , 858 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Tex. 1993); Ivy v. Carrell , 407 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Tex. 1966). 2005See Estate of Pollack v. McMurrey, 858 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Tex. 1993); Ivy v. Carrell, 407 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Tex. 1966). | 4 | 4 |
Ivy v. Carrellgreen2 sentences2005See Estate of Pollack v. McMurrey , 858 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Tex. 1993); Ivy v. Carrell , 407 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Tex. 1966). 2005See Estate of Pollack v. McMurrey, 858 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Tex. 1993); Ivy v. Carrell, 407 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Tex. 1966). | 4 | 4 |
Brooks v. Stategreen2 sentences2015In Brooks, the motion for new trial did not include a request for a hearing, and the court held that the “trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing.” 894 S.W.2d at 847 . 2014In Brooks, the motion for new trial did not include a request for a hearing, and the court held that the “trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing.” 894 S.W.2d at 847 . | 3 | 5 |
Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.green2 sentences2014See id. 2014See id. | 3 | 3 |
Martin v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Edwards v. State, 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State, 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.CTyler 1998, pet. ref=d) (Aa trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested@); Brooks v. State, 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.CTyler 1995, no pet.) (Athe trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing@); Martin v. State, 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 1992), pet. ref=d, 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Edwards v. State , 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State , 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1998, pet. ref'd) ("a trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested"); Brooks v. State , 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1995, no pet.) ("the trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing"); Martin v. State , 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1992), pet. ref'd , 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Timpte Industries, Inc. v. Gishgreen2 sentences2024Timpte Indus. v. Gish, 286 S.W.3d 306, 310 (Tex. 2009). 2011See Timpte Indus., Inc. v. Gish , 286 S.W.3d 306, 311 (Tex. 2009). | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2002App. 1992); Smith v. 1 The State provided an affidavit to this Court indicating that the electronic research tool it used failed to indicate, as is the normal practice, that the opinions were unpublished opinions. 3 State, 797 S.W.2d 243, 250 (Tex. App.CCorpus Christi 1990, pet. ref=d), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 975 (1991). 2002App. 1992); Smith v. State , 797 S.W.2d 243, 250 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 975 (1991). | 2 | 2 |
Tidmore v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Edwards v. State, 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State, 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.CTyler 1998, pet. ref=d) (Aa trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested@); Brooks v. State, 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.CTyler 1995, no pet.) (Athe trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing@); Martin v. State, 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 1992), pet. ref=d, 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Edwards v. State , 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State , 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1998, pet. ref'd) ("a trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested"); Brooks v. State , 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1995, no pet.) ("the trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing"); Martin v. State , 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1992), pet. ref'd , 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Perezgreen1 sentence2025Park Place Hosp. v. Estate of Milo, 990 S.W.2d 508 , 511 (Tex. 1995); Lear Sieglar, Inc. v. Perez, 819 S.W.2d 470, 471-72 (Tex. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Sandersgreen1 sentence2015In re Sanders, 153 S.W.3d 54 57 (Tex., 2004) 8 Movant’s motion is not sworn to. | 1 | 1 |
Villarreal v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Smith, 286 S.W.3d at 338 ; Hobbs v. State, 298 S.W.3d 193 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Rozell v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Rozell v. State , 137 S.W.3d 106, 108 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 2004), aff = d , 176 S.W.3d 228 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
McIntire v. Stategreen1 sentence1993McIntire v. State, 698 S.W.2d 652, 656-661 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Vera v. State, 836 S.W.2d 344, 347 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1992, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Vera v. Stategreen1 sentence1993McIntire v. State, 698 S.W.2d 652, 656-661 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Vera v. State, 836 S.W.2d 344, 347 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1992, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Memorial Hospital of Galveston County v. Gillisgreen2 sentences1989Memorial Hospital of Galveston Co. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex.1987) (per curiam); see also Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc., 705 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.1986) (per curiam) (effect of failure to comply with rule 165a governing motions to reinstate after dismissals for want of prosecution); Olvera v. Olvera, 705 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (per curiam) (on mot. for reh’g) (a movant under rule 306a must not only file a sworn motion, but also take action to obtain a hearing on the motion). 1989Memorial Hospital of Galveston Co. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex. 1987) (per curiam); see also Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc., 705 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.1986) (per curiam) (effect of failure to comply with rule 165a governing motions to reinstate after dismissals for want of prosecution); Olvera v. Olvera, 705 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex.App.San Antonio 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (per curiam) (on mot. for reh'g) (a movant under rule 306a must not only file a sworn motion, but also take action to obtain a hearing on the motion). | 1 | 1 |
Olvera v. Olveragreen2 sentences1989Memorial Hospital of Galveston Co. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex.1987) (per curiam); see also Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc., 705 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.1986) (per curiam) (effect of failure to comply with rule 165a governing motions to reinstate after dismissals for want of prosecution); Olvera v. Olvera, 705 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (per curiam) (on mot. for reh’g) (a movant under rule 306a must not only file a sworn motion, but also take action to obtain a hearing on the motion). 1989Memorial Hospital of Galveston Co. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex. 1987) (per curiam); see also Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc., 705 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.1986) (per curiam) (effect of failure to comply with rule 165a governing motions to reinstate after dismissals for want of prosecution); Olvera v. Olvera, 705 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex.App.San Antonio 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (per curiam) (on mot. for reh'g) (a movant under rule 306a must not only file a sworn motion, but also take action to obtain a hearing on the motion). | 1 | 1 |
Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc.green2 sentences1989Memorial Hospital of Galveston Co. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex.1987) (per curiam); see also Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc., 705 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.1986) (per curiam) (effect of failure to comply with rule 165a governing motions to reinstate after dismissals for want of prosecution); Olvera v. Olvera, 705 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (per curiam) (on mot. for reh’g) (a movant under rule 306a must not only file a sworn motion, but also take action to obtain a hearing on the motion). 1989Memorial Hospital of Galveston Co. v. Gillis, 741 S.W.2d 364, 365 (Tex. 1987) (per curiam); see also Butts v. Capitol City Nursing Home, Inc., 705 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.1986) (per curiam) (effect of failure to comply with rule 165a governing motions to reinstate after dismissals for want of prosecution); Olvera v. Olvera, 705 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex.App.San Antonio 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (per curiam) (on mot. for reh'g) (a movant under rule 306a must not only file a sworn motion, but also take action to obtain a hearing on the motion). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rozell v. State
green
2 sentences2015In Rozell, the defendant made no request for a hearing in his motion for new trial. 176 S.W.3d at 229 . 2014In Rozell, the defendant made no request for a hearing in his motion for new trial. 176 S.W.3d at 229 . | 3 | 2008–2015 |
Hobbs v. State
green
2 sentences2023Hobbs, 298 S.W.3d at 199 ; Martinez, 74 S.W.3d at 21 . 2015See Smith, 286 S.W.3d at 338 ; Hobbs v. State, 298 S.W.3d 193 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2015–2023 |
Martin v. State
green
2 sentences2002See Edwards v. State, 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State, 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.CTyler 1998, pet. ref=d) (Aa trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested@); Brooks v. State, 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.CTyler 1995, no pet.) (Athe trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing@); Martin v. State, 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.CTexarkana 1992), pet. ref=d, 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Edwards v. State , 37 S.W.3d 511, 514 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2001, no pet.); Tidmore v. State , 976 S.W.2d 724, 732 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1998, pet. ref'd) ("a trial court does not err by failing to hold a hearing where none is requested"); Brooks v. State , 894 S.W.2d 843, 847 (Tex. App.--Tyler 1995, no pet.) ("the trial court is not required to convene a hearing on a motion for new trial absent a request by the movant for such hearing"); Martin v. State , 823 S.W.2d 395, 397 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1992), pet. ref'd , 830 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Thomas v. Bliss & Laughlin Steel Co.
neutral
2 sentences2002App. 1992); Smith v. 1 The State provided an affidavit to this Court indicating that the electronic research tool it used failed to indicate, as is the normal practice, that the opinions were unpublished opinions. 3 State, 797 S.W.2d 243, 250 (Tex. App.CCorpus Christi 1990, pet. ref=d), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 975 (1991). 2002App. 1992); Smith v. State , 797 S.W.2d 243, 250 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 975 (1991). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Jordan v. State
green
2 sentences1997Jordan, 883 S.W.2d at 665 . 1996Jordan v. State, 883 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Cr.App.1994). | 2 | 1996–1997 |
Martinez v. State
green
1 sentence2023Hobbs, 298 S.W.3d at 199 ; Martinez, 74 S.W.3d at 21 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda
green
1 sentence2021Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 226–27. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Yamada v. Friend
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Aguilera
green
1 sentence2014State v. Aguilera, 165 S.W. 3d 695 ; See State v. Bates, 889 S.W.Zd 309 (Tex. Crim.App.l994). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.