undeveloped claim in Pennsylvania

2005See Commonwealth v. Bracey, 568 Pa. 264 , 795 A.2d 935 , 940 n. 4 (2001) (noting that the mere tacking on of a sentence stating that all prior counsel were ineffective for failing to raise underlying claims of error does not satisfy Appellant’s burden of establishing that he is entitled to post conviction relief on ineffective assistance of counsel claim.) Appellant also raises a number of claims arising from the penalty phase.

2005See Commonwealth v. Bracey, 568 Pa. 264 , 795 A.2d 935 , 940 n. 4 (2001) (noting that the mere tacking on of a sentence stating that all prior counsel were ineffective for failing to raise underlying claims of error does not satisfy Appellant’s burden of establishing that he is entitled to post conviction relief on ineffective assistance of counsel claim.) Appellant also raises a number of claims arising from the penalty phase.

2022See Commonwealth v. Briggs, 12 A.3d 291 , 326 n.34 (Pa. 2011) (concluding that an undeveloped claim is waived).

2022See Commonwealth v. Briggs, 12 A.3d 291 , 326 n.34 (Pa. 2011) (concluding that an undeveloped claim is waived).

2022When “an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citing, inter alia, Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a)); see also Commonwealth v. Russell, 209 A.3d 419 , 429–30 (Pa. Super. 2019) (explaining that this Court will not make an appellant’s arguments and finding waiver of an undeveloped claim).

2022When “an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citing, inter alia, Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a)); see also Commonwealth v. Russell, 209 A.3d 419 , 429–30 (Pa. Super. 2019) (explaining that this Court will not make an appellant's arguments and finding waiver of an undeveloped claim).

2022When “an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citing, inter alia, Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a)); see also Commonwealth v. Russell, 209 A.3d 419 , 429–30 (Pa. Super. 2019) (explaining that this Court will not make an appellant’s arguments and finding waiver of an undeveloped claim).

2022When “an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citing, inter alia, Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a)); see also Commonwealth v. Russell, 209 A.3d 419 , 429–30 (Pa. Super. 2019) (explaining that this Court will not make an appellant's arguments and finding waiver of an undeveloped claim).

2021See Commonwealth v. Beshore, 916 A.2d 1128, 1140 (Pa. Super. 2007) (en banc). - 12 - J-A14008-21 Lastly, Appellants do not dispute the trial court’s finding that the change in the access point benefits them.

2021See Commonwealth v. Beshore, 916 A.2d 1128, 1140 (Pa. Super. 2007) (en banc).

2006This opinion preceded the Court’s acknowledgement in Commonwealth v. McGill, 574 Pa. 574 , 832 A.2d 1014 (2003), that the Court's requirements pertaining to development of a claim of ineffective stewardship on the part of appellate counsel were not clear, and the associated holding that an appropriate response to an undeveloped claim in cases preceding McGill was a remand to provide an opportunity for adequate development under clarified standards.

2006This opinion preceded the Court’s acknowledgement in Commonwealth v. McGill, 574 Pa. 574 , 832 A.2d 1014 (2003), that the Court's requirements pertaining to development of a claim of ineffective stewardship on the part of appellate counsel were not clear, and the associated holding that an appropriate response to an undeveloped claim in cases preceding McGill was a remand to provide an opportunity for adequate development under clarified standards.

1997See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gorby, 527 Pa. 98, 112-13 , 588 A.2d 902, 909 (1991) (evidence of flight relevant and admissible to establish an inference of guilt). .In an undeveloped claim presented in a footnote, Appellant indicates that defense counsel did not object to every question the prosecutor asked of Permint.

1997See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gorby, 527 Pa. 98, 112-13 , 588 A.2d 902, 909 (1991) (evidence of flight relevant and admissible to establish an inference of guilt). .In an undeveloped claim presented in a footnote, Appellant indicates that defense counsel did not object to every question the prosecutor asked of Permint.

2025Tielsch, supra. In sum, as none of Richardson’s multiple claims on appeal have merit, we affirm the PCRA court’s order denying him post-conviction relief.

2023See Commonwealth v. Tielsch, 934 A.2d 81, 93 (Pa. Super. 2007) (refusing to consider an undeveloped claim). -9- J-S33037-22 years to 103 year[s’] state time incarceration” during its initial colloquy.9 See N.T., 9/11/18, at 13.

2024See Commonwealth v. Clayton, 816 A.2d 217, 221 (Pa. 2002) (“it is a well settled principle of appellate jurisprudence that undeveloped claims are waived and unreviewable on appeal”).

2024See M.Z.T.M.W., 163 A.3d at 465-66 .

2023See Wolf v. Santiago, 230 A.3d 394, 401 (Pa. Super. 2020).

2022See Wholaver, 177 A.3d at 160 (“The Rules of Appellate Procedure require appellants to support their arguments with pertinent discussion and citation to authority.”) (citing Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a)).

2019If Appellant 4 See Commonwealth v. Spotz, 18 A.3d 244, 323 (Pa. 2011) (holding that the appellant's undeveloped claim was unreviewable and, therefore, waived). -6 J -S17007-19 intended to raise this claim in the statement of the questions involved, it is not apparent to this Court.

2019Accordingly, this Court finds no further support in the record for the instant undeveloped claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel and, as such, the claim must fail. [Footnote 26] Com[monwealth] v. Jones, 811 A.2d 994, 1003 (Pa. 2002). [Footnote 27] N.T. 8/30/12 at []131.

2017See Commonwealth v. Arrington, 624 Pa. 506 , 86 A.3d 831 (2014). 6 Although not included in his “Statement of Questions Involved,” Appellant presents the following undeveloped claim in the argument portion of his brief: CHALLENGE TO DISCRETIONARY ASPECT OF SENTENCE Trial court imposed an illegal and unconstitutional sentence which is unwaivable.

2017See Commonwealth v. Arrington, 624 Pa. 506 , 86 A.3d 831 (2014). 6 Although not included in his “Statement of Questions Involved,” Appellant presents the following undeveloped claim in the argument portion of his brief: CHALLENGE TO DISCRETIONARY ASPECT OF SENTENCE Trial court imposed an illegal and unconstitutional sentence which is unwaivable.

2015See Connor, 832 A.2d at 1119 . - 11 - J.

2015See Commonwealth v. Walter, 600 Pa. 392 , 966 A.2d 560, 566 (2009) (holding claims waived for failure to develop them).

2015See Commonwealth v. Walter, 600 Pa. 392 , 966 A.2d 560, 566 (2009) (holding claims waived for failure to develop them).

2014See Pierce, supra at 213 .

2014Commonwealth v. Padilla, 80 A.3d 1238 , 1255 n.16 (Pa. 2013) (“an undeveloped claim is waived”).

2013See Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Szymanski, 936 A.2d 87, 103 (Pa.Super.2007) (deeming a claim that is undeveloped and unsupported by relevant authority to be waived); Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a).

1999See Commonwealth v. Blount, 538 Pa. 156, 174 , 647 A.2d 199, 209 (1994) (fact that Appellant may believe that further explanation by the court would be beneficial does not render charge defective.) 6.

1999See Commonwealth v. Blount, 538 Pa. 156, 174 , 647 A.2d 199, 209 (1994) (fact that Appellant may believe that further explanation by the court would be beneficial does not render charge defective.) 6.