Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
30 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2019“A reviewing court should notice plain error only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. “‘A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been Pickaway 18CA2 22 different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.’” Blanton at ¶87; quoting Dickess at ¶32 ; citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶29} Appellant arg 2019“A reviewing court should notice plain error only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. “‘A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been Pickaway 18CA2 22 different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.’” Blanton at ¶87; quoting Dickess at ¶32 ; citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶29} Appellant arg | 1 | 19 |
State v. Hardygreen2 sentences2014State v. Hardy, 28 Ohio St.2d 89, 92 , 276 N.E.2d 247 (1971). {¶ 26} “A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.” Dickess at ¶ 32, citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶ 27} Under R.C. 2903.13(C)(5), the offense of Assault becomes a felony of the fourth degree, “If the victim of the offense is a peace officer ***whil 2014State v. Hardy, 28 Ohio St.2d 89, 92 , 276 N.E.2d 247 (1971). {¶ 26} “A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.” Dickess at ¶ 32, citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶ 27} Under R.C. 2903.13(C)(5), the offense of Assault becomes a felony of the fourth degree, “If the victim of the offense is a peace officer ***whil | 1 | 3 |
State v. Dickessgreen2 sentences2023Cuyahoga No. 108691, 2020-Ohio-4132, ¶ 20 , citing State v. Dickess, 174 Ohio App.3d 658 , 2008- Ohio-39, 884 N.E.2d 92, ¶ 31 (4th Dist.). 2023Cuyahoga No. 108691, 2020-Ohio-4132, ¶ 20 , citing State v. Dickess, 174 Ohio App.3d 658 , 2008- Ohio-39, 884 N.E.2d 92, ¶ 31 (4th Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hudson, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2003)green1 sentence2007A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown the outcome of the trial clearly would have been otherwise if the instruction was properly given." State v. Robinson , Cuyahoga App. No. 67363; See, also, State v. Hudson , Delaware App. No. 02-CAA-12065, 2003-Ohio-7049 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tichongreen2 sentences2004See State v. Tichon, (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 758 , 767 , 658 N.E.2d 16 . {¶ 73} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. 2004See State v. Tichon, (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 758 , 767 , 658 N.E.2d 16 . {¶ 73} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Cleveland v. Buckley
green
2 sentences2019“A reviewing court should notice plain error only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. “‘A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been Pickaway 18CA2 22 different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.’” Blanton at ¶87; quoting Dickess at ¶32 ; citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶29} Appellant arg 2019“A reviewing court should notice plain error only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. “‘A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been Pickaway 18CA2 22 different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.’” Blanton at ¶87; quoting Dickess at ¶32 ; citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶29} Appellant arg | 19 | 1993–2020 |
State v. Long
green
2 sentences2019“A reviewing court should notice plain error only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. “‘A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been Pickaway 18CA2 22 different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.’” Blanton at ¶87; quoting Dickess at ¶32 ; citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994), and Cleveland v. Buckley, 67 Ohio App.3d 799, 805 , 588 N.E.2d 912 (8th Dist.1990). {¶29} Appellant arg 1986Under this court’s holding in State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 91 [ 7 O.O.3d 178 ], a defective jury instruction is not plain error unless “the outcome of the trial clearly would have been otherwise” if the error had not occurred. | 4 | 1986–2019 |
State v. Perryman
green
2 sentences2008State v. Perryman (1976), 49 Ohio St.2d 14 , 358 N.E.2d 1040 . {¶ 63} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. 2008State v. Perryman (1976), 49 Ohio St.2d 14 , 358 N.E.2d 1040 . {¶ 63} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. | 3 | 2004–2008 |
State v. Mitchell
green
1 sentence2023Cuyahoga No. 108691, 2020-Ohio-4132, ¶ 20 , citing State v. Dickess, 174 Ohio App.3d 658 , 2008- Ohio-39, 884 N.E.2d 92, ¶ 31 (4th Dist.). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Blevins
green
1 sentence2023“A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been different but for the alleged erroneous instruction.” State v. Blevins, 2019-Ohio-2744 , 140 N.E.3d 27 , ¶ 29 (4th Dist.). “[R]eversible error should not be predicated upon one phrase or one sentence in a jury charge; instead, a reviewing court must consider the jury charge in its entirety.” Id. at ¶ 27. “[I]f an instruction correctly states the law, its precise wording and format are within the trial court's discretion.” Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Huckleby
green
1 sentence2021Gallia No. 16CA15, 2018-Ohio-4438 , 2018 WL 5780958 , ¶ 17, citing State v. Campbell, 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 41 , 630 N.E.2d 339 (1994). {¶ 10} In the case sub judice, after our review of the record, counsels’ arguments, and the trial court’s jury instructions, we do not believe that any error that the trial court may have committed affected the outcome of the trial. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Kelley v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2014Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245 , 2006-Ohio-4356 , 852 N.E.2d 1200 ; Kelley v. Wilson, 103 Ohio St.3d 201 , 2004-Ohio-4883 , 814 N.E.2d 1222 ; State ex rel. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Bozsik v. Hudson
green
1 sentence2014Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245 , 2006-Ohio-4356 , 852 N.E.2d 1200 ; Kelley v. Wilson, 103 Ohio St.3d 201 , 2004-Ohio-4883 , 814 N.E.2d 1222 ; State ex rel. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2009Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 687 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
United States v. Atkinson
green
2 sentences2008Barnes, citing United States v. Atkinson (1936), 297 U.S. 157 , 56 S.Ct. 391 , 80 L.Ed. 555 . {¶ 32} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been different but for the alleged erroneous instruction. 2008Barnes, citing United States v. Atkinson (1936), 297 U.S. 157 , 56 S.Ct. 391 , 80 L.Ed. 555 . {¶ 32} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless the defendant shows that the outcome of the trial clearly would have been different but for the alleged erroneous instruction. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Campbell
green
1 sentence2008State v. Campbell , 69 Ohio St.3d 38 , 1994-Ohio-492 , 630 N.E.2d 339 ; Cleveland v. Buckley (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 799 , 588 N.E.2d 912 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Phillips
green
2 sentences2005State v. Phillips (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 72 , 83 , 656 N.E.2d 643 . {¶ 16} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. 2005State v. Phillips (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 72 , 83 , 656 N.E.2d 643 . {¶ 16} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Fields
green
2 sentences2005See, State v. Hardy (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 89 , 276 N.E.2d 247 ; State v. Fields (1984), 13 Ohio App.3d 433 , 469 N.E.2d 939 . {¶ 17} In the case at bar, the defective jury instruction asserted by appellant was that the trial court instructed the jury that voluntary manslaughter was an "affirmative defense" rather than "an inferior degree of murder." While the labeling of voluntary manslaughter may not have been technically correct, it patently cannot be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different "but for" the alleged error. 2005See, State v. Hardy (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 89 , 276 N.E.2d 247 ; State v. Fields (1984), 13 Ohio App.3d 433 , 469 N.E.2d 939 . {¶ 17} In the case at bar, the defective jury instruction asserted by appellant was that the trial court instructed the jury that voluntary manslaughter was an "affirmative defense" rather than "an inferior degree of murder." While the labeling of voluntary manslaughter may not have been technically correct, it patently cannot be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different "but for" the alleged error. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Cooperrider
green
1 sentence2002State v. Copperrider (1983), 4 Ohio St.3d 226 . {¶ 32} A defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error unless it can be shown that the outcome of the trial would clearly have been different but for the alleged error. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
United States v. Edsel Griffin
green
1 sentence1997Appellant relies on the Sixth Circuit's decision in United States v. Griffin (C.A. 6, 1967), 382 F.2d 823 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Blankenship
green
1 sentence1997The use of a defective jury instruction does not rise to the level of plain error "unless the outcome of the trial clearly would have been otherwise if the instruction had been properly given." State v. Blankenship (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 534 , 546 ; Cleveland v. Buckley (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 799 , 805 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1990State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , 7 O.O.3d 178 , 372 N.E.2d 804 , paragraph two of the syllabus; State v. Cooey (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 20, 31 , 544 N.E.2d 895, 910 ; State v. Johnson (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 96, 102 , 545 N.E.2d 636, 642 ; State v. Wilson (Dec. 16, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 51519, unreported, at 6, 1986 WL 14750 . 1990State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , 7 O.O.3d 178 , 372 N.E.2d 804 , paragraph two of the syllabus; State v. Cooey (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 20, 31 , 544 N.E.2d 895, 910 ; State v. Johnson (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 96, 102 , 545 N.E.2d 636, 642 ; State v. Wilson (Dec. 16, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 51519, unreported, at 6, 1986 WL 14750 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Cooey
green
2 sentences1990State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , 7 O.O.3d 178 , 372 N.E.2d 804 , paragraph two of the syllabus; State v. Cooey (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 20, 31 , 544 N.E.2d 895, 910 ; State v. Johnson (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 96, 102 , 545 N.E.2d 636, 642 ; State v. Wilson (Dec. 16, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 51519, unreported, at 6, 1986 WL 14750 . 1990State v. Long (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 91 , 7 O.O.3d 178 , 372 N.E.2d 804 , paragraph two of the syllabus; State v. Cooey (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 20, 31 , 544 N.E.2d 895, 910 ; State v. Johnson (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 96, 102 , 545 N.E.2d 636, 642 ; State v. Wilson (Dec. 16, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 51519, unreported, at 6, 1986 WL 14750 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.