Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Mendezgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., People v. Mendez, 221 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2013Johnson, 2013 IL App (2d) 110535, ¶ 76 . 2013Johnson, 2013 IL App (2d) 110535, ¶ 76 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
People v. Morgan
red
1 sentence2024In the petition, he argued, inter alia, that his sentence was unconstitutional because the 25-year sentencing enhancement that was applied to him had been ruled unconstitutional in People v. -3- No. 1-22-1610 Morgan, 203 Ill. 2d 470 (2003). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Dennis
green
2 sentences2003While conceding that this issue may only be reviewed under a plain-error analysis, defendant relies on People v. Dennis, 181 Ill. 2d 87 (1998), which directs that, in determining whether a defendant is entitled to a new trial due to a defective jury instruction, a court of review is to engage in a two-part analysis. 2003While conceding that this issue may only be reviewed under a plain-error analysis, defendant relies on People v. Dennis, 181 Ill.2d 87 , 229 Ill.Dec. 552 , 692 N.E.2d 325 (1998), which directs that, in determining whether a defendant is entitled to a new trial due to a defective jury instruction, a court of review is to engage in a two-part analysis. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Tannenbaum
green
2 sentences1981(People v. Tannenbaum (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 177, 182 , 415 N.E.2d 1027 .) Here, although defendants initially agreed to the erroneous instruction, the court was afforded an opportunity to correct the error when defendants objected to the court’s reply to the jury’s inquiry. 1981(People v. Tannenbaum (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 177, 182 , 415 N.E.2d 1027 .) Here, although defendants initially agreed to the erroneous instruction, the court was afforded an opportunity to correct the error when defendants objected to the court’s reply to the jury’s inquiry. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.