Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
27 Virginia opinions name it 8 courts 1945–2025 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Giddensgreen2 sentences2025Gross negligence is “a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Patterson v. City of Danville, 301 Va. 181 , 198 (2022) (quoting Commonwealth v. Giddens, 295 Va. 607, 613 (2018)). 2025Gross Negligence Gross negligence “is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Commonwealth v. Giddens, 295 Va. 607, 613 (2018). | 9 | 9 |
Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2014Ferguson v. Ferguson, 212 Va. 86, 92 , 181 S.E.2d 648, 653 (1971). “[Gross negligence] is a heedless and palpable violation of a legal duty respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388, 393 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 691 (1987) {quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)). 2014Ferguson v. Ferguson, 212 Va. 86, 92 , 181 S.E.2d 648, 653 (1971). “[Gross negligence] is a heedless and palpable violation of a legal duty respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388, 393 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 691 (1987) {quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)). | 9 | 9 |
Frazier v. City of Norfolkgreen2 sentences2014Ferguson v. Ferguson, 212 Va. 86, 92 , 181 S.E.2d 648, 653 (1971). “[Gross negligence] is a heedless and palpable violation of a legal duty respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388, 393 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 691 (1987) {quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)). 2014Ferguson v. Ferguson, 212 Va. 86, 92 , 181 S.E.2d 648, 653 (1971). “[Gross negligence] is a heedless and palpable violation of a legal duty respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388, 393 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 691 (1987) {quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)). | 7 | 9 |
Elliott v. Cartergreen2 sentences2024Gross Negligence As we recently stated, “Gross negligence is ‘a degree of negligence showing indifference to another and an utter disregard of prudence that amounts to a complete neglect of the safety of such other person.’” [It] “is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” “Gross negligence ‘requires a degree of - 14 - negligence that would shock fair-minded persons, although demonstrating something less than willful recklessness.’” Howard v. Harris, 80 Va. App. 365 , 379 2022Virginia law defines gross negligence as “a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Commonwealth v. Giddens, 295 Va. 607, 613 (2018) (emphases added) (quoting Chapman v. City of Virginia Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 (1996)). “[A] claim for gross negligence must fail as a matter of law when the evidence shows that the defendants exercised some degree of care.” Elliott v. Carter, 292 Va. 618, 622 (2016). | 7 | 7 |
Chapman v. City of Virginia Beachgreen2 sentences2024Gross negligence “is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Id. (quoting Chapman v. City of Va. Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 (1996)). 2022Virginia law defines gross negligence as “a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Commonwealth v. Giddens, 295 Va. 607, 613 (2018) (emphases added) (quoting Chapman v. City of Virginia Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 (1996)). “[A] claim for gross negligence must fail as a matter of law when the evidence shows that the defendants exercised some degree of care.” Elliott v. Carter, 292 Va. 618, 622 (2016). | 6 | 6 |
Cowan v. Hospice Support Care, Inc.green2 sentences2025Its well-settled definition is replete with superlatives: it is “a degree of negligence showing . . . an utter disregard of prudence that amounts to a complete neglect of the safety of such other person.” Elliott v. Carter, 292 Va. 618, 622 (2016) (emphasis added) (quoting Cowan v. Hospice Support Care, Inc., 268 Va. 482, 487 (2004)). “[T]he standard for gross negligence [in Virginia] is one of indifference, not inadequacy.” Id. (second alteration in original) (quoting Kuykendall v. Young Life, 261 Fed. 2024Gross negligence “is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Id. (quoting Chapman v. City of Va. Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 (1996)). | 4 | 6 |
First Virginia Bank-Colonial v. Bakergreen2 sentences2024Stated differently, “[g]ross negligence ‘requires a degree of negligence that would shock fair-minded persons, although demonstrating something less than willful recklessness.’” 14 Derivative sovereign immunity applies when an individual claims the sovereign immunity to which his employer may be entitled and is based on the notion that “government can function only through its servants, and certain of those servants must enjoy the same immunity in the performance of their discretionary duties as the government enjoys.” First Va. Bank- Colonial v. Baker, 225 Va. 72, 79 (1983). 15 When simple ne 2024Stated differently, “[g]ross negligence ‘requires a degree of negligence that would shock fair-minded persons, although demonstrating something less than willful recklessness.’” 14 Derivative sovereign immunity applies when an individual claims the sovereign immunity to which his employer may be entitled and is based on the notion that “government can function only through its servants, and certain of those servants must enjoy the same immunity in the performance of their discretionary duties as the government enjoys.” First Va. Bank- Colonial v. Baker, 225 Va. 72, 79 (1983). 15 When simple ne | 2 | 2 |
Volpe v. City of Lexingtongreen2 sentences2016It is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care.” Volpe v. City of Lexington, 281 Va. 630, 639 (2011) (quoting Chapman v. City of Virginia Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 (1996)). 2012It is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care." Volpe v. City of Lexington, 281 Va. 630, 639 , 708 S.E.2d 824, 829 (2011) (quoting Chapman v. City of Virginia Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 , 475 S.E.2d 798, 800-01 (1996)). | 2 | 2 |
Burns v. Gagnongreen2 sentences2013It is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence or the want of even scant care.” Burns v. Gagnon, 283 Va. 657, 678 , 727 S.E.2d 634, 647 (2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted). 2013It is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of others which amounts to the absence of slight diligence or the want of even scant care.” Burns v. Gagnon, 283 Va. 657, 678 , 727 S.E.2d 634, 647 (2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted). | 1 | 4 |
Ferguson v. Fergusongreen2 sentences2014Ferguson v. Ferguson, 212 Va. 86, 92 , 181 S.E.2d 648, 653 (1971). “[Gross negligence] is a heedless and palpable violation of a legal duty respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388, 393 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 691 (1987) {quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)). 2014Ferguson v. Ferguson, 212 Va. 86, 92 , 181 S.E.2d 648, 653 (1971). “[Gross negligence] is a heedless and palpable violation of a legal duty respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 388, 393 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 691 (1987) {quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)). | 1 | 2 |
Kuykendall v. Young Lifegreen1 sentence2025Its well-settled definition is replete with superlatives: it is “a degree of negligence showing . . . an utter disregard of prudence that amounts to a complete neglect of the safety of such other person.” Elliott v. Carter, 292 Va. 618, 622 (2016) (emphasis added) (quoting Cowan v. Hospice Support Care, Inc., 268 Va. 482, 487 (2004)). “[T]he standard for gross negligence [in Virginia] is one of indifference, not inadequacy.” Id. (second alteration in original) (quoting Kuykendall v. Young Life, 261 Fed. | 1 | 1 |
Kennedy v. McElroygreen1 sentence2024Moreover, “[d]eliberate conduct is ‘important evidence on the question of gross negligence.’” Chapman v. City of Va. Beach, 252 Va. 186, 190 (1996) (quoting Kennedy v. McElroy, 195 Va. 1078, 1082 (1954)). | 1 | 1 |
Griffin v. Shivelygreen1 sentence2023“Whether certain actions constitute gross negligence is generally a factual matter for resolution by the jury and becomes a question of law only when reasonable people cannot differ.” Koffman, 265 Va. at 15 (citing Griffin v. Shively, 227 Va. 317, 320 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
Tubman v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2012This Court addressed the severity of the nature of the negligent conduct necessary to constitute gross and wanton negligence in Tubman v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 267, 274 , 348 S.E.2d 871, 875 (1986) (emphasis added) (quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378-79 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)): “Gross negligence is substantially and appreciably higher in magnitude than ordinary negligence . . . [i]t is very great negligence, or the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care. . . [i]t is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of other 2012This Court addressed the severity of the nature of the negligent conduct necessary to constitute gross and wanton negligence in Tubman v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 267, 274 , 348 S.E.2d 871, 875 (1986) (emphasis added) (quoting Town of Big Stone Gap v. Johnson, 184 Va. 375, 378-79 , 35 S.E.2d 71, 73 (1945)): “Gross negligence is substantially and appreciably higher in magnitude than ordinary negligence . . . [i]t is very great negligence, or the absence of slight diligence, or the want of even scant care. . . [i]t is a heedless and palpable violation of legal duty respecting the rights of other | 1 | 1 |
Colby v. Boydengreen1 sentence2005Gross negligence has been defined as “a heedless and palpable violation of legal duties respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 549, 552 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 688 (1987), and as “the absence of slight diligence or the want of even scant care.” Colby v. Boyden, 241 Va. 125, 130 , 400 S.E.2d 184, 184 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lentz v. Morris
green
2 sentences2024Stated differently, “[g]ross negligence ‘requires a degree of negligence that would shock fair-minded persons, although demonstrating something less than willful recklessness.’” 14 Derivative sovereign immunity applies when an individual claims the sovereign immunity to which his employer may be entitled and is based on the notion that “government can function only through its servants, and certain of those servants must enjoy the same immunity in the performance of their discretionary duties as the government enjoys.” First Va. Bank- Colonial v. Baker, 225 Va. 72, 79 (1983). 15 When simple ne 2024Stated differently, “[g]ross negligence ‘requires a degree of negligence that would shock fair-minded persons, although demonstrating something less than willful recklessness.’” 14 Derivative sovereign immunity applies when an individual claims the sovereign immunity to which his employer may be entitled and is based on the notion that “government can function only through its servants, and certain of those servants must enjoy the same immunity in the performance of their discretionary duties as the government enjoys.” First Va. Bank- Colonial v. Baker, 225 Va. 72, 79 (1983). 15 When simple ne | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Koffman v. Garnett
green
1 sentence2023“Whether certain actions constitute gross negligence is generally a factual matter for resolution by the jury and becomes a question of law only when reasonable people cannot differ.” Koffman, 265 Va. at 15 (citing Griffin v. Shively, 227 Va. 317, 320 (1984)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Colby v. Boyden
green
1 sentence2005Gross negligence has been defined as “a heedless and palpable violation of legal duties respecting the rights of others,” Frazier v. City of Norfolk, 234 Va. 549, 552 , 362 S.E.2d 688, 688 (1987), and as “the absence of slight diligence or the want of even scant care.” Colby v. Boyden, 241 Va. 125, 130 , 400 S.E.2d 184, 184 (1991). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Wright v. Osborne
green
2 sentences1945The element of culpability which characterizes all negligence is, in gross negligence, magnified to a high degree as compared with that present in ordinary negligence. # * * ” In Wright v. Osborne, 175 Va. 442, 445 , 9 S. E. (2d) 452, 454 , we said that “gross negligence is that degree of negligence which shows an utter disregard of prudence amounting to complete neglect of the safety of another.” “Wanton negligence” is of even a higher degree than “gross negligence.” Thomas v. Snow, supra ( 162 Va., at page 661 ). 1945The element of culpability which characterizes all negligence is, in gross negligence, magnified to a high degree as compared with that present in ordinary negligence. # * * ” In Wright v. Osborne, 175 Va. 442, 445 , 9 S. E. (2d) 452, 454 , we said that “gross negligence is that degree of negligence which shows an utter disregard of prudence amounting to complete neglect of the safety of another.” “Wanton negligence” is of even a higher degree than “gross negligence.” Thomas v. Snow, supra ( 162 Va., at page 661 ). | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Thomas v. Snow
green
1 sentence1945The element of culpability which characterizes all negligence is, in gross negligence, magnified to a high degree as compared with that present in ordinary negligence. # * * ” In Wright v. Osborne, 175 Va. 442, 445 , 9 S. E. (2d) 452, 454 , we said that “gross negligence is that degree of negligence which shows an utter disregard of prudence amounting to complete neglect of the safety of another.” “Wanton negligence” is of even a higher degree than “gross negligence.” Thomas v. Snow, supra ( 162 Va., at page 661 ). | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.