Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
166 California opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2026 103 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences2024DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738 , setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the procedural background. 2024DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738 , setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the procedural background. | 1 | 153 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wende
green
2 sentences2024DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738 , setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the procedural background. 2023DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738 , setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the procedural background and potential issue of whether the court erred in denying defendant relief under section 1172.6, and requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record. | 160 | 2013–2026 |
People v. Delgadillo
green
2 sentences2026DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th 216 , setting forth a statement of the case, the factual background and a summary of the procedural background. 2026DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th 216 , setting forth a statement of the case, the factual background and a summary of the procedural background. | 26 | 2023–2026 |
People v. Lewis
green
2 sentences2023(See Lewis, supra, 11 Cal.5th at p. 957 .) As relevant here, defendant’s petition included the three qualifying conditions specified in subdivision (a)(1) through (3) of section 1172.6, by alleging the charging document filed against him allowed the prosecution to proceed under the felony murder rule or natural and probable consequences doctrine, that he was convicted of second degree murder under the felony murder rule or the natural and probable consequences doctrine, and that he could not presently be convicted of murder because of changes to section 188 or 189 made effective January 1, 201 2023DISCUSSION After defendant appealed, appointed appellate counsel filed a brief under the authority of Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th 216 , setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the procedural background and potential issue of whether Sherwood is entitled to a new evidentiary hearing following the passage of Senate Bill No. 775 and the opinion in People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952 (Lewis). | 2 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Vickers
green
1 sentence2016Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 setting forth a statement of 2 People v. Vickers (1972) 8 Cal.3d 451 . 3 The underlying guilty plea arose from a theft from defendant’s mother. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.