short answer claim in Connecticut

1986“The short answer to this claim is that no offer of proof appears in the record as to the . . . content of the testimony the [defendant] sought to introduce. ‘Without knowing the answer that might be forthcoming we are unable to rule on this assignment of error.’ ” Jacobsen v. Jacobsen, 177 Conn. 259, 267 , 413 A.2d 854 (1979), quoting Johnson v. Newell, 160 Conn. 269, 277 , 278 A.2d 776 (1971).

1986“The short answer to this claim is that no offer of proof appears in the record as to the . . . content of the testimony the [defendant] sought to introduce. ‘Without knowing the answer that might be forthcoming we are unable to rule on this assignment of error.’ ” Jacobsen v. Jacobsen, 177 Conn. 259, 267 , 413 A.2d 854 (1979), quoting Johnson v. Newell, 160 Conn. 269, 277 , 278 A.2d 776 (1971).

1986“The short answer to this claim is that no offer of proof appears in the record as to the . . . content of the testimony the [defendant] sought to introduce. ‘Without knowing the answer that might be forthcoming we are unable to rule on this assignment of error.’ ” Jacobsen v. Jacobsen, 177 Conn. 259, 267 , 413 A.2d 854 (1979), quoting Johnson v. Newell, 160 Conn. 269, 277 , 278 A.2d 776 (1971).

1986“The short answer to this claim is that no offer of proof appears in the record as to the . . . content of the testimony the [defendant] sought to introduce. ‘Without knowing the answer that might be forthcoming we are unable to rule on this assignment of error.’ ” Jacobsen v. Jacobsen, 177 Conn. 259, 267 , 413 A.2d 854 (1979), quoting Johnson v. Newell, 160 Conn. 269, 277 , 278 A.2d 776 (1971).

2001In affirming the judgment of contempt, we reiterated the rule that “[a]n order of the court must be obeyed until it has been modified or successfully challenged.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 530; Mulholland v. Mulholland,, 229 Conn. 643, 649 , 643 A.2d 246 (1994) (“a party has a duty to obey a court order however erroneous the action of the court may be” [internal quotation marks omitted]).

2001In affirming the judgment of contempt, we reiterated the rule that “[a]n order of the court must be obeyed until it has been modified or successfully challenged.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 530; Mulholland v. Mulholland,, 229 Conn. 643, 649 , 643 A.2d 246 (1994) (“a party has a duty to obey a court order however erroneous the action of the court may be” [internal quotation marks omitted]).

2000Fernandez v. Estate of Fred Ayers, supra, 56 Conn. App. 336 .

1999The plaintiff responds, first, that the existence of a statutory remedy does not necessarily prevent a plaintiff from CT Page 3019 pursuing her common law remedies." The short answer to this claim is that "a cause of action in tort for wrongful termination . . . exists only when a discharge violates public policy and the employee is otherwise without a remedy." Pucci v. American Republican , Superior Court, judicial district of Waterbury, Docket No. 118491, (May 23, 1994) ( 9 CSCR 626 , 627 ).

1997Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co., 190 Conn. 8 , 13 , 459 A.2d 115 (1983).

1997Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co., 190 Conn. 8 , 13 , 459 A.2d 115 (1983).

1995Eldridge v. Eldridge , supra, page 494.

1994The short answer to this claim of the plaintiffs is that "[a]n administrative agency is not required to believe any witness, even an expert." Manor Development Corporation v. Conservation Commission , 180 Conn. 692 , 697 , 433 A.2d 999 (1980).

1994The short answer to this claim of the plaintiffs is that "[a]n administrative agency is not required to believe any witness, even an expert." Manor Development Corporation v. Conservation Commission , 180 Conn. 692 , 697 , 433 A.2d 999 (1980).

1993Ed. 2d 590 (1974); Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 393-94 , 52 S. Ct. 189 , 76 L.

1993Ed. 2d 590 (1974); Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 393-94 , 52 S. Ct. 189 , 76 L.

1993“The short answer to this claim is that inconsistency of the verdicts is immaterial.” State v. Rosado, 178 Conn. 704, 708-709 , 425 A.2d 108 (1979); Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 101 , 94 S. Ct. 2887 , 41 L.

1993“The short answer to this claim is that inconsistency of the verdicts is immaterial.” State v. Rosado, 178 Conn. 704, 708-709 , 425 A.2d 108 (1979); Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 101 , 94 S. Ct. 2887 , 41 L.

1993“The short answer to this claim is that inconsistency of the verdicts is immaterial.” State v. Rosado, 178 Conn. 704, 708-709 , 425 A.2d 108 (1979); Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 101 , 94 S. Ct. 2887 , 41 L.

1993“The short answer to this claim is that inconsistency of the verdicts is immaterial.” State v. Rosado, 178 Conn. 704, 708-709 , 425 A.2d 108 (1979); Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 101 , 94 S. Ct. 2887 , 41 L.

1991In discussing the requirement of the Commission considering alternatives, the court, in Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation Commission, 212 Conn. 710 , 726 (1989), stated in part as follows: Finally, the plaintiffs contend that "the trial court erred by finding that the applicant(s) submitted alternatives to its proposed subdivision plan to enable the commission to consider alternatives to the proposed regulated activities as it is required to do." CT Page 3822 The short answer to this claim of the plaintiffs is that, although the applicable statutes and regulations mandate that the commi

1991The short answer to this claim is provided in our recently decided case of State v. Ober, 24 Conn. App. 347 , 588 A.2d 1080 (1991).

1991The short answer to this claim is provided in our recently decided case of State v. Ober, 24 Conn. App. 347 , 588 A.2d 1080 (1991).

1990See General Statutes § 2-18; State v. Blasko, 202 Conn. 541, 554 , 522 A.2d 753 (1987); State v. Kozlowski, 199 Conn. 667 , 679 n.10, 509 A.2d 20 (1986).

1990See General Statutes § 2-18; State v. Blasko, 202 Conn. 541, 554 , 522 A.2d 753 (1987); State v. Kozlowski, 199 Conn. 667 , 679 n.10, 509 A.2d 20 (1986).

1990See General Statutes § 2-18; State v. Blasko, 202 Conn. 541, 554 , 522 A.2d 753 (1987); State v. Kozlowski, 199 Conn. 667 , 679 n.10, 509 A.2d 20 (1986).

1990See General Statutes § 2-18; State v. Blasko, 202 Conn. 541, 554 , 522 A.2d 753 (1987); State v. Kozlowski, 199 Conn. 667 , 679 n.10, 509 A.2d 20 (1986).

1990It is only upon a plea of guilty that the requirement that the plea be intelligent and voluntary arises under cases such as Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , 89 S.Ct. 1907 (1969), McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 (1969) and State v. Childree, 189 Conn. 114 (1983).

1990It is only upon a plea of guilty that the requirement that the plea be intelligent and voluntary arises under cases such as Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , 89 S.Ct. 1907 (1969), McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 (1969) and State v. Childree, 189 Conn. 114 (1983).

1990It is only upon a plea of guilty that the requirement that the plea be intelligent and voluntary arises under cases such as Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , 89 S.Ct. 1907 (1969), McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 (1969) and State v. Childree, 189 Conn. 114 (1983).

1990It is only upon a plea of guilty that the requirement that the plea be intelligent and voluntary arises under cases such as Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , 89 S.Ct. 1907 (1969), McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 (1969) and State v. Childree, 189 Conn. 114 (1983).

1990It is only upon a plea of guilty that the requirement that the plea be intelligent and voluntary arises under cases such as Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 , 89 S.Ct. 1907 (1969), McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 (1969) and State v. Childree, 189 Conn. 114 (1983).

1988“Without knowing the answer that might be forthcoming we are unable to rule on this assignment of error.” ’ Jacobsen v. Jacobsen, 177 Conn. 259, 267 , 413 A.2d 854 (1979), quoting Johnson v. Newell, 160 Conn. 269, 277 , 278 A.2d 776 (1971).” State v. Conrod, 198 Conn. 592, 597 , 504 A.2d 494 (1986).

1988“Without knowing the answer that might be forthcoming we are unable to rule on this assignment of error.” ’ Jacobsen v. Jacobsen, 177 Conn. 259, 267 , 413 A.2d 854 (1979), quoting Johnson v. Newell, 160 Conn. 269, 277 , 278 A.2d 776 (1971).” State v. Conrod, 198 Conn. 592, 597 , 504 A.2d 494 (1986).

1986“It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that we are provided with an adequate appellate record to support his claim of error.” Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd., 194 Conn. 400, 407 , 480 A.2d 552 (1984).

1986“It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that we are provided with an adequate appellate record to support his claim of error.” Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd., 194 Conn. 400, 407 , 480 A.2d 552 (1984).

1983The short answer to this claim was set forth by this court in Spitzer v. Waterbury, 113 Conn. 84 , 154 A. 157 (1931).

1983The short answer to this claim was set forth by this court in Spitzer v. Waterbury, 113 Conn. 84 , 154 A. 157 (1931).

1983The short answer to this claim is that a trier is not required to believe testimony merely because it is not directly contradicted; State v. Dudla, 190 Conn. 1, 7 , 458 A.2d 682 (1983); Stanton v. Grigley, 177 Conn. 558, 563 , 418 A.2d 923 (1979); Taylor v. Corkey, 142 Conn. 150, 154 , 111 A.2d 925 (1955); nor is the trier bound by the opinions of experts.

1983The short answer to this claim is that a trier is not required to believe testimony merely because it is not directly contradicted; State v. Dudla, 190 Conn. 1, 7 , 458 A.2d 682 (1983); Stanton v. Grigley, 177 Conn. 558, 563 , 418 A.2d 923 (1979); Taylor v. Corkey, 142 Conn. 150, 154 , 111 A.2d 925 (1955); nor is the trier bound by the opinions of experts.

1983The short answer to this claim is that a trier is not required to believe testimony merely because it is not directly contradicted; State v. Dudla, 190 Conn. 1, 7 , 458 A.2d 682 (1983); Stanton v. Grigley, 177 Conn. 558, 563 , 418 A.2d 923 (1979); Taylor v. Corkey, 142 Conn. 150, 154 , 111 A.2d 925 (1955); nor is the trier bound by the opinions of experts.

1983The short answer to this claim is that a trier is not required to believe testimony merely because it is not directly contradicted; State v. Dudla, 190 Conn. 1, 7 , 458 A.2d 682 (1983); Stanton v. Grigley, 177 Conn. 558, 563 , 418 A.2d 923 (1979); Taylor v. Corkey, 142 Conn. 150, 154 , 111 A.2d 925 (1955); nor is the trier bound by the opinions of experts.

1983The short answer to this claim is that a trier is not required to believe testimony merely because it is not directly contradicted; State v. Dudla, 190 Conn. 1, 7 , 458 A.2d 682 (1983); Stanton v. Grigley, 177 Conn. 558, 563 , 418 A.2d 923 (1979); Taylor v. Corkey, 142 Conn. 150, 154 , 111 A.2d 925 (1955); nor is the trier bound by the opinions of experts.

1983The short answer to this claim is that a trier is not required to believe testimony merely because it is not directly contradicted; State v. Dudla, 190 Conn. 1, 7 , 458 A.2d 682 (1983); Stanton v. Grigley, 177 Conn. 558, 563 , 418 A.2d 923 (1979); Taylor v. Corkey, 142 Conn. 150, 154 , 111 A.2d 925 (1955); nor is the trier bound by the opinions of experts.

1980Id., 287 .

1979State v. Manning, 162 Conn. 112, 122 , 291 A.2d 750 (1971).

1979State v. Manning, 162 Conn. 112, 122 , 291 A.2d 750 (1971).