25 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Naasgreen2 sentences1996State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Gray, 598 So.2d 1215 (La.App. 4th Cir.1992). 1993LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 703 and 841; State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535, 547 (La.1981) (on rehearing), cert. den., 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Phanor, 325 So.2d 579, 581 (La.1976). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Rodneygreen2 sentences2016Compare State v. Lewis, 12-902 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/27/13) , 121 So.3d 128 , 132 n. 1, writ denied, 13-1926 (La.04/17/14), 138 So.3d 618 (“[W]hen a defendant does not object to the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion prior to trial, the motion is considered waived.”); State v. Rodney, 96-116 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1103, 1105 (“A defendant who fails to object at trial to the admission of the identification evidence or testimony, and who fails to file a motion to suppress the identification, waives the right to assert the error on appeal.”). 2016Compare State v. Lewis, 12-902 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/27/13) , 121 So.3d 128 , 132 n. 1, writ denied, 13-1926 (La.04/17/14), 138 So.3d 618 (“[W]hen a defendant does not object to the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion prior to trial, the motion is considered waived.”); State v. Rodney, 96-116 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1103, 1105 (“A defendant who fails to object at trial to the admission of the identification evidence or testimony, and who fails to file a motion to suppress the identification, waives the right to assert the error on appeal.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lewisgreen2 sentences2016Compare State v. Lewis, 12-902 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/27/13) , 121 So.3d 128 , 132 n. 1, writ denied, 13-1926 (La.04/17/14), 138 So.3d 618 (“[W]hen a defendant does not object to the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion prior to trial, the motion is considered waived.”); State v. Rodney, 96-116 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1103, 1105 (“A defendant who fails to object at trial to the admission of the identification evidence or testimony, and who fails to file a motion to suppress the identification, waives the right to assert the error on appeal.”). 2016Compare State v. Lewis, 12-902 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/27/13) , 121 So.3d 128 , 132 n. 1, writ denied, 13-1926 (La.04/17/14), 138 So.3d 618 (“[W]hen a defendant does not object to the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion prior to trial, the motion is considered waived.”); State v. Rodney, 96-116 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1103, 1105 (“A defendant who fails to object at trial to the admission of the identification evidence or testimony, and who fails to file a motion to suppress the identification, waives the right to assert the error on appeal.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Stoutgreen1 sentence2016Compare State v. Lewis, 12-902 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/27/13) , 121 So.3d 128 , 132 n. 1, writ denied, 13-1926 (La.04/17/14), 138 So.3d 618 (“[W]hen a defendant does not object to the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion prior to trial, the motion is considered waived.”); State v. Rodney, 96-116 (La.App. 5 Cir. 06/25/96) , 676 So.2d 1103, 1105 (“A defendant who fails to object at trial to the admission of the identification evidence or testimony, and who fails to file a motion to suppress the identification, waives the right to assert the error on appeal.”). | 1 | 1 |
Russo v. Vasquezgreen1 sentence2001See Russo v. Vasquez, 648 So.2d at 884 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brooksgreen1 sentence1995State v. Brooks, 633 So.2d 659, 663 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0308 (La. 5/20/94), 637 So.2d 475 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Phanorgreen1 sentence1993LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 703 and 841; State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535, 547 (La.1981) (on rehearing), cert. den., 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Phanor, 325 So.2d 579, 581 (La.1976). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Colemangreen | 1 | 1 |
Hoffman v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1987With respect to the first issue, we have consistently held that a witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination [6] only in response to questions "where the defendant has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." State v. Edwards, 419 So.2d 881 (La.1982); State v. Coleman, 406 So.2d 563, 566 (La.1981) (citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 487 , 71 S.Ct. 814, 818 , 95 L.Ed. 1118, 1124 (1951)). 1987With respect to the first issue, we have consistently held that a witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination [6] only in response to questions "where the defendant has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." State v. Edwards, 419 So.2d 881 (La.1982); State v. Coleman, 406 So.2d 563, 566 (La.1981) (citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 487 , 71 S.Ct. 814, 818 , 95 L.Ed. 1118, 1124 (1951)). | 1 | 1 |
| Raia v. WWL-TVgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lynch v. Hanover Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). 2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). | 3 | 1994–2005 |
Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). 2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). | 3 | 1994–2005 |
Merry Shipping, Inc. v. Merry Shipping Company, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). 2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). | 3 | 1994–2005 |
Brown & Root, Inc. v. Mistich
green
2 sentences2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). 2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). | 3 | 1994–2005 |
Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
green
2 sentences1996State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Gray, 598 So.2d 1215 (La.App. 4th Cir.1992). 1993LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 703 and 841; State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535, 547 (La.1981) (on rehearing), cert. den., 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Phanor, 325 So.2d 579, 581 (La.1976). | 3 | 1992–1996 |
Keating v. Keating
green
2 sentences1996State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Gray, 598 So.2d 1215 (La.App. 4th Cir.1992). 1993LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 703 and 841; State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535, 547 (La.1981) (on rehearing), cert. den., 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Phanor, 325 So.2d 579, 581 (La.1976). | 3 | 1992–1996 |
Johnson v. Granholm
green
2 sentences1996State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Gray, 598 So.2d 1215 (La.App. 4th Cir.1992). 1993LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 703 and 841; State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535, 547 (La.1981) (on rehearing), cert. den., 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Phanor, 325 So.2d 579, 581 (La.1976). | 3 | 1992–1996 |
Rodriguez v. United States
green
2 sentences2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). 2005Complaint of Merry Shipping, Inc., 650 F.2d 622 (5th Cir.1981); Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc., 609 So.2d 921 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 996 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 , 113 S.Ct. 3020 , 125 L.Ed.2d 709 (1993). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
St. Romain v. Luker
neutral
1 sentence2020Romain, 804 So. 2d at 88 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Clark v. Warner
green
2 sentences2011Clark, 6 La.Ann. at 409 . 2011Clark, 6 La.Ann. at 409 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Howard v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. Fund
neutral
1 sentence2008Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 06-1276 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/22/07) , 970 So.2d 21 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
HOPEWELL INC. v. Mobil Oil Co.
green
1 sentence2007In support of its argument, LeJeune Brothers cites the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Hopewell, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co., 00-3280 (La.2/9/01), 784 So.2d 653 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company
green
1 sentence2007The right to assert a claim for damages to land is a personal right, not a real right and, consequently, it is not transferred by a mere transfer of title to the land; "[r]ather, for the subsequent owner of the land to be in a position to assert the claim, there must be a specific assignment of the right to him." Id., citing Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Co., 329 So.2d 744 (La.1975). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Braquet v. Administrators of Tulane Educ. Fund
green
1 sentence2007Mortis Causa Donation The Nieces cite Braquet v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, 304 So.2d 720 (La.App. 4 Cir.1974) in support of their position that a decedent's collateral relatives and would-be intestate heirs may sue on a testator's behalf to enforce a condition of a will. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Dorvin Land Corp. v. Parish of Jefferson
green
1 sentence2007The right to assert a claim for damages to land is a personal right, not a real right and, consequently, it is not transferred by a mere transfer of title to the land; "[r]ather, for the subsequent owner of the land to be in a position to assert the claim, there must be a specific assignment of the right to him." Id., citing Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Co., 329 So.2d 744 (La.1975). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
LeSage v. Union Producing Co.
green
2 sentences2005LeSage v. Union Producing Co., 249 La. 42 , 184 So.2d 727 [(1966)]." The pleadings do not establish that Michael has the right to assert a claim for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress based on misrepresented paternity, even assuming the existence of such a claim in this state. 2005LeSage v. Union Producing Co., 249 La. 42 , 184 So.2d 727 [(1966)]." The pleadings do not establish that Michael has the right to assert a claim for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress based on misrepresented paternity, even assuming the existence of such a claim in this state. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Walker
green
1 sentence2005State v. Walker, 94-0587 (La.App. 1st Cir.4/7/95), 654 So.2d 451 , writs denied, 95-1124 & 95-1125 (La.9/22/95), 660 So.2d *785 470. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Gray
neutral
1 sentence1996State v. Naas, 409 So.2d 535 (La.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2933 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); State v. Gray, 598 So.2d 1215 (La.App. 4th Cir.1992). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Brooks
neutral
1 sentence1995State v. Brooks, 633 So.2d 659, 663 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0308 (La. 5/20/94), 637 So.2d 475 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Bazley v. Tortorich
green
1 sentence1993In Bazely v. Tortorich, 397 So.2d 475 (La.1981), and subsequently in Cardle v. Betts, 512 So.2d 389 (La.1987), the Supreme Court differentiated between the unintentional and intentional tort. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Caudle v. Betts
green
1 sentence1993In Bazely v. Tortorich, 397 So.2d 475 (La.1981), and subsequently in Cardle v. Betts, 512 So.2d 389 (La.1987), the Supreme Court differentiated between the unintentional and intentional tort. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Edwards
green
1 sentence1987With respect to the first issue, we have consistently held that a witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination [6] only in response to questions "where the defendant has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." State v. Edwards, 419 So.2d 881 (La.1982); State v. Coleman, 406 So.2d 563, 566 (La.1981) (citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 487 , 71 S.Ct. 814, 818 , 95 L.Ed. 1118, 1124 (1951)). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Deshotels v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York neutral | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| Cain v. Board of Supervisors of Elections neutral | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| Durham v. First Guaranty Bank of Hammond neutral | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Charles v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Welch v. Clemons Bros. Lumber Co. neutral | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Fidelity Nat. Bank of Baton Rouge v. Vuci neutral | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| Gault v. Pineland Naval Stores Co. neutral | 1 | 1959–1959 |
| Alsaya v. Johnson green | 1 | 1955–1955 |
| Clostio's Heirs v. Sinclair Refining Co. green | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.