Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
25 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mosley v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex. Crim. 2013Mosley, 983 S.W.2d at 259 ; Davis v. State, 268 S.W.3d 683, 712 (Tex.App.Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref'd). | 11 | 19 |
Guy v. Stategreen2 sentences2008App. 1984). 38: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 39: See Scheanette , 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham , 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40: See Guy v. State , 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 42: On appeal, he also briefs Rule 404(a) and (b). 2008Roxanne Hayes’s Testimony 39 … See Scheanette, 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham, 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40 … See Guy v. State, 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41 … See Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 15 In his seventh issue, appellant argues that the trial court improperly admitted Roxanne Hayes’s testimony relating an incident somewhat similar to Cleveland’ | 9 | 9 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Mosley, 983 S.W.2d at 259 ; Davis, 268 S.W.3d at 712 . 2013Mosley, 983 S.W.2d at 259 ; Davis v. State, 268 S.W.3d 683, 712 (Tex.App.Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref'd). | 2 | 4 |
Thompson v. Stategreen2 sentences2008App. 1984). 38: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 39: See Scheanette , 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham , 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40: See Guy v. State , 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 42: On appeal, he also briefs Rule 404(a) and (b). 2008App. 1984). 38: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 39: See Scheanette , 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham , 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40: See Guy v. State , 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 42: On appeal, he also briefs Rule 404(a) and (b). | 2 | 3 |
Scheanette v. Stategreen2 sentences2008App. 1984). 38: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 39: See Scheanette , 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham , 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40: See Guy v. State , 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 42: On appeal, he also briefs Rule 404(a) and (b). 2008Roxanne Hayes’s Testimony 39 … See Scheanette, 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham, 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40 … See Guy v. State, 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41 … See Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 15 In his seventh issue, appellant argues that the trial court improperly admitted Roxanne Hayes’s testimony relating an incident somewhat similar to Cleveland’ | 1 | 2 |
Timothy Scott Weeks v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Weeks v. State, 396 S.W.3d 737, 746 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2013, pet. refd). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ingham v. State
green
2 sentences2008Roxanne Hayes’s Testimony 39 … See Scheanette, 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham, 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40 … See Guy v. State, 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41 … See Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 15 In his seventh issue, appellant argues that the trial court improperly admitted Roxanne Hayes’s testimony relating an incident somewhat similar to Cleveland’ 2008App. 1984). 38: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 39: See Scheanette , 144 S.W.3d at 510 ; Ingham , 679 S.W.2d at 509 . 40: See Guy v. State , 160 S.W.3d 606, 617 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. ref’d) (holding that “a prosecutor risks improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument refers to defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsel’s character”). 41: See Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 . 42: On appeal, he also briefs Rule 404(a) and (b). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Tyra Ann Whitney v. State
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Dowthitt v. Texas
green
1 sentence2005Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex.Crim.App.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1466 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Jarvis v. United States
green
1 sentence2005Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex.Crim.App.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 , 119 S.Ct. 1466 , 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.