error at trial cannot claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

error at trial cannot claim in Washington

26 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2026 10 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Momah v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 2010 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2012–2019
2 sentences

2019“The basic premise of the invited error doctrine is that a party who sets up an error at trial cannot claim that very action as error on appeal and receive a new trial.” State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 837 , 131 5.

2012“The basic premise of the invited error doctrine is that a party who sets up an error at trial cannot claim that very action as error on appeal and receive a new trial.” State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 160 (2010).

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Momah green
wash · 2009
2 sentences

2026Under the invited error doctrine, “a party who sets up an error at trial cannot claim that very action as error on appeal.” State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009).

2026Under the invited error doctrine, “a party who sets up an error at trial cannot claim that very action as error on appeal.” State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009).

232012–2026
In re the Personal Restraint of Coggin green
wash · 2014
2 sentences

2025In determining whether the invited error doctrine -4- applies, courts consider “whether the defendant affirmatively assented to the error, materially contributed to it, or benefited from it.” In re Coggin, 182 Wn.2d 115, 119 , 340 P.3d 810 (2014) (plurality opinion).

2025In determining whether the invited error doctrine -4- applies, courts consider “whether the defendant affirmatively assented to the error, materially contributed to it, or benefited from it.” In re Coggin, 182 Wn.2d 115, 119 , 340 P.3d 810 (2014) (plurality opinion).

42015–2025
State v. Henderson green
wash · 1990
2 sentences

2019State v. Henderson, 114 Wn.2d 867, 868 , 792 P.2d 514 (1990).

2019State v. Henderson, 114 Wn.2d 867, 868 , 792 P.2d 514 (1990).

32018–2019
State v. Carson green
washctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2026The doctrine “‘precludes a criminal defendant from seeking appellate review of an error [they] helped create, even when the alleged error involves constitutional rights.’” State v. Tatum, 23 Wn. App. 2d 123 , 128, 514 P.3d 763 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Carson, 179 Wn. App. 961, 973 , 320 P.3d 185 (2014)[, aff’d, 184 Wn.2d 207 , 357 P.3d 1064 (2015)]), review denied, 200 Wn.2d 1021 (2022).

2026The doctrine “‘precludes a criminal defendant from seeking appellate review of an error [they] helped create, even when the alleged error involves constitutional rights.’” State v. Tatum, 23 Wn. App. 2d 123 , 128, 514 P.3d 763 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Carson, 179 Wn. App. 961, 973 , 320 P.3d 185 (2014)[, aff’d, 184 Wn.2d 207 , 357 P.3d 1064 (2015)]), review denied, 200 Wn.2d 1021 (2022).

22024–2026
State v. Carson green
wash · 2015
2 sentences

2026The doctrine “‘precludes a criminal defendant from seeking appellate review of an error [they] helped create, even when the alleged error involves constitutional rights.’” State v. Tatum, 23 Wn. App. 2d 123 , 128, 514 P.3d 763 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Carson, 179 Wn. App. 961, 973 , 320 P.3d 185 (2014)[, aff’d, 184 Wn.2d 207 , 357 P.3d 1064 (2015)]), review denied, 200 Wn.2d 1021 (2022).

2026The doctrine “‘precludes a criminal defendant from seeking appellate review of an error [they] helped create, even when the alleged error involves constitutional rights.’” State v. Tatum, 23 Wn. App. 2d 123 , 128, 514 P.3d 763 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Carson, 179 Wn. App. 961, 973 , 320 P.3d 185 (2014)[, aff’d, 184 Wn.2d 207 , 357 P.3d 1064 (2015)]), review denied, 200 Wn.2d 1021 (2022).

12026–2026
State v. Mercado green
washctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2023An error is invited when the party “affirmatively assent[s] to the error, materially contribute[s] to it, or benefit[s] from it.” State v. Mercado, 181 Wn.

12023–2023
State v. Tyson green
washctapp · 1983
2 sentences

2019Restraint of Coggin, 182 Wn.2d 115, 119 , 340 P.3d 810 (2014) (quoting State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009)). “‘Even where constitutional issues are involved, invited error precludes judicial review.’” State v. Henderson, 114 Wn.2d 867, 871 , 792 P.2d 514 (1990) (quoting State v. 8 Tyson, 33 Wn. App. 859, 864 , 658 P.2d 55 (1983)).

2019Restraint of Coggin, 182 Wn.2d 115, 119 , 340 P.3d 810 (2014) (quoting State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009)). “‘Even where constitutional issues are involved, invited error precludes judicial review.’” State v. Henderson, 114 Wn.2d 867, 871 , 792 P.2d 514 (1990) (quoting State v. 8 Tyson, 33 Wn. App. 859, 864 , 658 P.2d 55 (1983)).

12019–2019
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Christopher Hood, App. green
washctapp · 2016
2 sentences

2017App. 127, 131 , 382 P.3d 710 (2016); State v. Momah, 167 Wn.2d 140, 153 , 217 P.3d 321 (2009).

2017A. Invited Error "The basic premise of the invited error doctrine is that a party who sets up an error at trial cannot claim that very action as error on appeal and receive a new trial." State v. Hood, 196 Wn.

12017–2017
In re the Personal Restraint of Speight green
wash · 2014
1 sentence

2016"The basic premise of the invited error doctrine is that a party who sets up an error at trial cannot claim that very action as error on appeal and receive a new trial." Coggin, 182 Wn.2d at 119 .

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (8) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 10.73.090 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.525 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check