OAL hearing (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

OAL hearing in New Jersey

24 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2025 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Toys \R\" Usgreen
· 1997 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2022
2 sentences

2022A contested case is defined as: [A] proceeding, ... in which the legal rights, duties, obligations, privileges, benefits[,] or other legal relations of specific parties are required by constitutional right or by statute to be determined by an agency by decisions, determinations, or orders, addressed to them or disposing of their interests, after opportunity for an agency hearing . . . . [N.J.S.A. 52:14B-2.] The Administrative Procedure Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 to -31, "does not create a substantive right to an administrative hearing; it merely provides for a procedure to be followed in the event

2021A contested case is defined under the APA as: [A] proceeding, . . . in which the legal rights, duties, obligations, privileges, benefits[,] or other legal relations of specific parties are required by constitutional right or by statute to be determined by an agency by decisions, determinations, or orders, addressed to them or disposing of their interests, after opportunity for an agency hearing . . . . [N.J.S.A. 52:14B-2.] "The [APA] . . . does not create a substantive right to an administrative hearing; it merely provides for a procedure to be followed in the event an administrative hearing i

33
In Re Amico/Tunnel Carwashgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2004 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2010–2021
2 sentences

2010Subsequently, in Amico/Tunnel Carwash, supra, 371 N.J.Super. at 199 , 852 A. 2d 277 , we held that neighboring residents had no right to an OAL hearing to contest a permit granted by the Meadowlands Commission to a service station owner who wanted to add a car wash to his existing business operations on the site.

2010Subsequently, in Amico/Tunnel Carwash, supra, 371 N.J.Super. at 199 , 852 A. 2d 277 , we held that neighboring residents had no right to an OAL hearing to contest a permit granted by the Meadowlands Commission to a service station owner who wanted to add a car wash to his existing business operations on the site.

12
In Re Cartergreen
nj · 2007 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 482 (2007).

11
Branch v. Dairygreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2019 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021See Branch, 459 N.J.

2021See Branch, 459 N.J.

11
In Re Stream Encroachment Permitgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2008 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020In re Stream Encroachment Permit, Permit No. 0200-04- 0002.1 FHA, 402 N.J.

2020In re Stream Encroachment Permit, Permit No. 0200-04- 0002.1 FHA, 402 N.J.

11
Stroman v. Browngreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1984 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Affirmed. 3 "As Vice Chancellor Bigelow said [over seventy years ago], 'An earthly court has no jurisdiction over the dead.'" Stroman v. Brown, 194 N.J.

11
In re Fogliogreen
nj · 2011 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018In re Foglio, 207 N.J. 38, 47 (2011); see also In the Matter of Michael Cervino (MSB, decided June 9, 2004); In the Matter of Michael Boylan (MSB, decided October 22, 2003) (holding it was within the appointing authority's discretion to bypass appellant due to two discrimination complaints against him, which could have resulted in disciplinary charges after being transferred to the OAL for a hearing); In the Matter of Gary R.

11
In Re Virtua-West Jersey Hospital Voorhees for a Certificate of Needgreen
nj · 2008 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Voorhees for a Certificate of Need, 194 N.J. 413, 422 (2008).] When, as here, a contested case is submitted to the OAL for a hearing, the agency head must review the record submitted by the ALJ and give attentive consideration to the ALJ's initial decision.

11
In Re Freshwater Wetlands Permitsgreen
nj · 2006 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010In Freshwater Wetlands, supra, 185 N.J. at 464, 888 A. 2d 441 , the Court ruled that the possible exacerbation of flooding conditions upon nearby property was too speculative of any injury to provide the neighboring landowners with a right to an OAL hearing to challenge a wetlands permit.

2010In Freshwater Wetlands, supra, 185 N.J. at 464, 888 A. 2d 441 , the Court ruled that the possible exacerbation of flooding conditions upon nearby property was too speculative of any injury to provide the neighboring landowners with a right to an OAL hearing to challenge a wetlands permit.

11
In re the Adoption of Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Productsgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1990 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000See, In re Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prod., 239 N.J.Super. 407, 413-14 , 571 A.2d 971 (App.Div.1990) (discussing changes that eviscerated the proposed rule’s scope).

2000See, In re Regulations Governing Volatile Organic Substances in Consumer Prod., 239 N.J.Super. 407, 413-14 , 571 A.2d 971 (App.Div.1990) (discussing changes that eviscerated the proposed rule’s scope).

11
Roxbury Bd. of Ed. v. Milford Bd. of Ed.green
njsuperctappdiv · 1995 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998That was not done, and, thus we find nothing in the record that relieved the parents of the challenge presented to them by West Milford’s letter. [Id. at 516-17, 662 A.2d 976 ] We conclude that by joining plaintiff as a defendant and seeking tuition reimbursement where no question existed as to an IDEA protected education, East Brunswick implicated IDEA and its protections in this action.

1998That was not done, and, thus we find nothing in the record that relieved the parents of the challenge presented to them by West Milford’s letter. [Id. at 516-17, 662 A.2d 976 ] We conclude that by joining plaintiff as a defendant and seeking tuition reimbursement where no question existed as to an IDEA protected education, East Brunswick implicated IDEA and its protections in this action.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Alexander S. v. Paramus Bor. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1990
2 sentences

1991It would impede the mission of COAH if a party raising a related legal question could, on that basis alone, assert the right to an *115 adversary evidentiary hearing before COAH or an OAL hearing of a contested case. [ 243 N.J.

1991It would impede the mission of COAH if a party raising a related legal question could, on that basis alone, assert the right to an *115 adversary evidentiary hearing before COAH or an OAL hearing of a contested case. [ 243 N.J.

21991–1991
Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores green
nj · 1999
1 sentence

2025If a complainant chooses to bring his claim with the Division and the respondent in that matter defaults, "the Director shall serve notice of the entry of default and supporting affidavit upon the respondent." N.J.A.C. 13:4 -5.2(d). "[This] notice shall inform the respondent that the case will be transmitted to the OAL for a hearing on a default basis and the transmittal will occur [twenty] calendar days after service on the respondent of the notice of entry of default." Ibid.

12025–2025
In Re Application of John madin/lordland Development International green
njsuperctappdiv · 1985
2 sentences

2021Further, contrary to appellants' claims, In re Madin/Lordland Development International for Pinelands Approval, 201 N.J.

2021Further, contrary to appellants' claims, In re Madin/Lordland Development International for Pinelands Approval, 201 N.J.

12021–2021
In Re Riverview Development, LLC green
njsuperctappdiv · 2010
1 sentence

2019Short of a trial-type OAL hearing, "[t]he Legislature has maintained significant avenues for third-party objectors to present their concerns about proposed permits to agency decision-makers before they reach a final determination on a permit application." Riverview Dev., 411 N.J.

12019–2019
New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency green
njsuperctappdiv · 2017
1 sentence

2017Thus in V.E., we affirmed the dismissal of the Title Nine litigation, reversed the DCPP's denial of an adjudicative hearing and remanded the matter to the OAL for a hearing. 448 N.J.

12017–2017
Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad green
nj · 2012
2 sentences

2015In instances in which the Court must engage in the interpretation of a statute, our fundamental task “is to discern and effectuate the intent of the Legislature.” Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad, 210 N.J. 581, 592 , 46 A.3d 1262 (2012).

2015In instances in which the Court must engage in the interpretation of a statute, our fundamental task “is to discern and effectuate the intent of the Legislature.” Murray v. Plainfield Rescue Squad, 210 N.J. 581, 592 , 46 A.3d 1262 (2012).

12015–2015
J.d. v. New Jersey Division of Developmental Disabilities green
njsuperctappdiv · 2000
2 sentences

2013Nor are we persuaded there are material facts in dispute that warrant an OAL hearing. “[N]ot every factual dispute need be referred to [the] OAL as a contested case.” J.D., supra, 329 N.J.Super. at 525 , 748 A.2d 613 .

2013Nor are we persuaded there are material facts in dispute that warrant an OAL hearing. “[N]ot every factual dispute need be referred to [the] OAL as a contested case.” J.D., supra, 329 N.J.Super. at 525 , 748 A.2d 613 .

12013–2013
Matter of Application of County of Bergen green
njsuperctappdiv · 1993
2 sentences

2010However, such referral is discretionary. *753 In re Application of County of Bergen, 268 N.J.Super. 403, 413 , 633 A. 2d 1017 (App. Div.1993) (explaining that the agency head has the discretion to refer a case to the OAL for a hearing).

2010However, such referral is discretionary. *753 In re Application of County of Bergen, 268 N.J.Super. 403, 413 , 633 A. 2d 1017 (App. Div.1993) (explaining that the agency head has the discretion to refer a case to the OAL for a hearing).

12010–2010
Mount Laurel Tp. v. Mipro Homes green
njsuperctappdiv · 2005
2 sentences

2006Mount Laurel Township v. Mipro Homes, 379 N.J.Super. 358 , 878 A.2d 38 (App.Div.2005), certif. granted, 186 N.J. 241 , 892 A.2d 1288 (2006), is not on point either.

2006Mount Laurel Township v. Mipro Homes, 379 N.J.Super. 358 , 878 A.2d 38 (App.Div.2005), certif. granted, 186 N.J. 241 , 892 A.2d 1288 (2006), is not on point either.

12006–2006
Spalt v. New Jersey DEP green
njsuperctappdiv · 1989
2 sentences

2006Id. at 212-13 , 567 A.2d 264 .

2006Id. at 212-13 , 567 A.2d 264 .

12006–2006
Hills Development v. Bernards Tp. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1988
2 sentences

2006Relying on Hills Development v. Bernards Township, 229 N.J.Super. 318 , 551 A.2d 547 (App.Div.1988), Del Ben contends that he was entitled to an OAL hearing on whether DEP stormwater regulations, N.J.A.C. 7:8-1.1 to -6.3, would reduce his ability to develop his property.

2006Relying on Hills Development v. Bernards Township, 229 N.J.Super. 318 , 551 A.2d 547 (App.Div.1988), Del Ben contends that he was entitled to an OAL hearing on whether DEP stormwater regulations, N.J.A.C. 7:8-1.1 to -6.3, would reduce his ability to develop his property.

12006–2006
State v. Pitcher green
nj · 2006
2 sentences

2006Mount Laurel Township v. Mipro Homes, 379 N.J.Super. 358 , 878 A.2d 38 (App.Div.2005), certif. granted, 186 N.J. 241 , 892 A.2d 1288 (2006), is not on point either.

2006Mount Laurel Township v. Mipro Homes, 379 N.J.Super. 358 , 878 A.2d 38 (App.Div.2005), certif. granted, 186 N.J. 241 , 892 A.2d 1288 (2006), is not on point either.

12006–2006
Mtg. Bankers v. NJ Real Estate neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1995
2 sentences

2000Finally, the ALJ was charged with the task of recommending to both the Commission and to the Commissioner the substance of new regulations that each agency might adopt to enforce the statute in a *121 way that would complement the Commission's interpretation. [ Id. at 238-39, 661 A. 2d 832 .] After the extensive OAL hearing the ALJ "issued an initial decision and report that is comprehensive, detailed, clear and sensitive to the viewpoints of all parties." Id. at 239 , 443 A. 2d 773 .

2000Finally, the ALJ was charged with the task of recommending to both the Commission and to the Commissioner the substance of new regulations that each agency might adopt to enforce the statute in a *121 way that would complement the Commission's interpretation. [ Id. at 238-39, 661 A. 2d 832 .] After the extensive OAL hearing the ALJ "issued an initial decision and report that is comprehensive, detailed, clear and sensitive to the viewpoints of all parties." Id. at 239 , 443 A. 2d 773 .

12000–2000
State v. Weir green
njsuperctappdiv · 1982
2 sentences

2000Finally, the ALJ was charged with the task of recommending to both the Commission and to the Commissioner the substance of new regulations that each agency might adopt to enforce the statute in a *121 way that would complement the Commission's interpretation. [ Id. at 238-39, 661 A. 2d 832 .] After the extensive OAL hearing the ALJ "issued an initial decision and report that is comprehensive, detailed, clear and sensitive to the viewpoints of all parties." Id. at 239 , 443 A. 2d 773 .

2000"The [Real Estate] Commission adopted the ALJ's initial decision and both agencies drew heavily on his report when they enacted new regulations." Ibid.

12000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NJ § N.J. Stat. § 52:14B-1 (7) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 10:5-1 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 52:14B-2 (3) NJ § N.J. Stat. § 52:14F-7 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check