extra-notice requirements rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

extra-notice requirements rule in Texas

24 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
Manuel v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1999 · cited in 8 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1999–2003
2 sentences

2003Id. ; see Manuel v. State , 994 S.W.2d 658, 662 (Tex. Crim.

2003Id. ; see Manuel v. State , 994 S.W.2d 658, 662 (Tex. Crim .

88
Sherman v. Stategreen
texapp · 1999 · cited in 12 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2003
2 sentences

2001“The rule does not mean, however, that our jurisdiction is properly invoked by the filing of a specific notice of appeal complying only in form with the extra-notice requirements of the rule.” Sherman, 12 S.W.3d at 492 .

2001Because Trevino's notice of appeal did not comply in substance with the extra-notice requirements of rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, see Sherman v. State , 12 S.W.3d 489, 492 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1999, no pet.) (holding record must substantiate extra-notice recitations in notice of appeal), this court only has jurisdiction to consider issues relating to the trial court's jurisdiction.

512
Watson v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1996 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–2001
2 sentences

2001See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (applying former rule 40(b)(1)); Hulshouser, 967 S.W.2d at 868 ; Williams, 962 S.W.2d at 704-05 .

2001See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex. Crim.App.1996) (applying former rule 40(b)(1)); Hulshouser, 967 S.W.2d at 868 ; Williams, 962 S.W.2d at 704-05 .

44
Davis v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1994 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Lyon, 872 S.W.2d at 736 ; Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Miller v. State, 879 S.W.2d 336, 337 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, pet. ref'd).

1997See Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1209 , 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46-47 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); see also Watson, 924 S.W.2d at 714-15 (extra notice of appeal requirements of rule 40(b)(1) apply to appeals following plea bargain for deferred adjudication).

33
Lyon v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1994 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Lyon, 872 S.W.2d at 736 ; Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Miller v. State, 879 S.W.2d 336, 337 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, pet. ref'd).

1997See Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1209 , 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46-47 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); see also Watson, 924 S.W.2d at 714-15 (extra notice of appeal requirements of rule 40(b)(1) apply to appeals following plea bargain for deferred adjudication).

23
Cooper v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002See Cooper v. State , 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim.

2002See Cooper v. State , 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim.

22
Betz v. Stategreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2003
2 sentences

2003Betz , 36 S.W.3d at 228 .

2002Betz v. State , 36 S.W.3d 227, 228-29 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.); Sherman v. State , 12 S.W.3d 489, 492 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1999, no pet.).

13
Flores v. Stategreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003Flores v. State, 43 S.W.3d 628, 629 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.).

11
Miller v. Stategreen
texapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Lyon, 872 S.W.2d at 736 ; Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Miller v. State, 879 S.W.2d 336, 337 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, pet. ref'd).

1997Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Lyon, 872 S.W.2d at 736 ; Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); Miller v. State, 879 S.W.2d 336, 337 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, pet. ref'd).

11
Riley v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997See Davis, 870 S.W.2d at 47 ; Riley v. State, 825 S.W.2d 699, 700-01 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). *475 This case is factually similar to Davis v. State.

11
Dea v. Pennsylvaniagreen
scotus · 1994 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997See Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1209 , 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46-47 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); see also Watson, 924 S.W.2d at 714-15 (extra notice of appeal requirements of rule 40(b)(1) apply to appeals following plea bargain for deferred adjudication).

11
Morris v. Perlosgreen
scotus · 1994 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997See Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1209 , 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 816 (1994); Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43, 46-47 (Tex.Crim.App.1994); see also Watson, 924 S.W.2d at 714-15 (extra notice of appeal requirements of rule 40(b)(1) apply to appeals following plea bargain for deferred adjudication).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Williams v. State green
texapp · 1998
2 sentences

2001See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (applying former rule 40(b)(1)); Hulshouser, 967 S.W.2d at 868 ; Williams, 962 S.W.2d at 704-05 .

2001See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex. Crim.App.1996) (applying former rule 40(b)(1)); Hulshouser, 967 S.W.2d at 868 ; Williams, 962 S.W.2d at 704-05 .

12001–2001
Hulshouser v. State green
texapp · 1998
2 sentences

2001See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (applying former rule 40(b)(1)); Hulshouser, 967 S.W.2d at 868 ; Williams, 962 S.W.2d at 704-05 .

2001See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex. Crim.App.1996) (applying former rule 40(b)(1)); Hulshouser, 967 S.W.2d at 868 ; Williams, 962 S.W.2d at 704-05 .

12001–2001

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Penal Code § 12.32 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check