Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McFarland v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Strickland, 466 U.S. at 670 , 104 S.Ct. at 2056 ; McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d 824, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). 1994Because an ineffectiveness of counsel claim cannot be demonstrated by isolating one portion of counsel’s representation, however, McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d at 843 , we will evaluate the effect of this error within the context of the totality of the representation later. | 10 | 10 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2015Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. at 694-95 . 2001Id. at 670 . | 12 | 1985–2015 |
Hernandez v. State
green
2 sentences2008The test for ineffective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland and adopted by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Hernandez , 726 S.W.2d at 57 , contains two prongs. 2007The test for ineffective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland and adopted by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Hernandez , 726 S.W.2d at 57 , contains two prongs. | 7 | 2001–2008 |
Ward v. Whitley
green
2 sentences1997Strickland, 466 U.S. at 670 , 104 S.Ct. at 2056 ; McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d 824, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). 1996McFarland v. State, 846 S.W.2d 824 , 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). | 4 | 1994–1997 |
Ashley v. United States
green
2 sentences1997Strickland, 466 U.S. at 670 , 104 S.Ct. at 2056 ; McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d 824, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). 1996McFarland v. State, 846 S.W.2d 824 , 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). | 4 | 1994–1997 |
Thompson v. State
green
2 sentences2015Id. 88 In reviewing the first prong of an ineffectiveness of counsel challenge to a conviction, there is a strong presumption an attorney’s performance is encapsulated within a wide range of reasonable professional assistance. 2003Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 813 . | 2 | 2003–2015 |
Cokeley v. United States
green
2 sentences1997Strickland, 466 U.S. at 670 , 104 S.Ct. at 2056 ; McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d 824, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). 1996McFarland v. State, 846 S.W.2d 824 , 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 963 , 113 S.Ct. 2937 , 124 L.Ed.2d 686 (1993). | 2 | 1996–1997 |
Hernandez v. State
green
1 sentence2015Hernandez, 988 S.W.2d at 772 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Pazel v. United States
green
1 sentence1997Strickland, 466 U.S. at 670 , 104 S.Ct. at 2056 ; McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d 824, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1002 , 114 S.Ct. 575 , 126 L.Ed.2d 474 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Simmons v. Maryland
green
1 sentence1997Strickland, 466 U.S. at 670 , 104 S.Ct. at 2056 ; McFarland v. State, 845 S.W.2d 824, 843 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1002 , 114 S.Ct. 575 , 126 L.Ed.2d 474 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.