Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Garciagreen2 sentences2011See id. at 254 ; see also Garcia, 893 S.W.2d at 528 ; American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio, 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex.App.-Houston (1st Dist.) 2010, pet. filed) (cases applying a modified de novo standard of review). 2011See id . at 254; see also Garcia , 893 S.W.2d at 528 ; American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio , 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex.App.--Houston (1st Dist.) 2010, pet. filed)(cases applying a modified de novo standard of review). | 8 | 12 |
Rodriguez v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.green2 sentences2011See id. at 254 ; see also Garcia, 893 S.W.2d at 528 ; American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio, 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex.App.-Houston (1st Dist.) 2010, pet. filed) (cases applying a modified de novo standard of review). 2011See id. at 254 ; see also Garcia, 893 S.W.2d at 528 ; American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio, 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex.App.-Houston (1st Dist.) 2010, pet. filed) (cases applying a modified de novo standard of review). | 6 | 6 |
State Office of Risk Management v. Escalantegreen2 sentences2010See Escalante, 162 S.W.3d at 626 . 2007State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Escalante, 162 S.W.3d 619, 626 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, pet. dism’d) (citing Texas Workers’ Comp. | 3 | 3 |
Leonard v. Cornyngreen2 sentences2006See , e.g ., Leonard v. Cornyn , 47 S.W.3d 524, 527 (Tex. App.--Austin 1999, pet. denied) ("It is evident that the trial court was powerless to rule on the motion to transfer venue if the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction."). (2) Second, TPCIGA contends more generally that the Travis County district court's application of the modified de novo standard when it should have applied substantial-evidence review exceeded the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. 2006See, e.g., Leonard v. Cornyn, 47 S.W.3d 524, 527 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. denied) (“It is evident that the trial court was powerless to rule on the motion to transfer venue if the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction.”).2 Second, TPCIGA contends more generally that the Travis County district court’s application of the modified de novo standard when it should have applied substantial-evidence review exceeded the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. | 3 | 3 |
Wingfoot Enterprises v. Alvaradogreen1 sentence2022In exchange for this prompt recovery, the act prohibits an employee from seeking common-law remedies from his employer, as well as his employer’s agents, servants, and employees, for personal injuries sustained in the course and scope of his employment.” Wingfoot Enters. v. Alvarado, 111 S.W.3d 134, 142 (Tex. 2003) 6 If a party seeks judicial review of a final appeals panel’s decision regarding “compensability or eligibility for or the amount of income or death benefits,” then the district court reviews the appeals panel’s decision under a modified de novo standard of review. | 1 | 1 |
Morales v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.green1 sentence2016See Morales, 241 S.W.3d at 519 ; Texas Prop. & Cas. | 1 | 1 |
Aguilar v. Moralesgreen1 sentence2010See Escalante, 162 S.W.3d at 626 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio
green
2 sentences2011See id. at 254 ; see also Garcia, 893 S.W.2d at 528 ; American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio, 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex.App.-Houston (1st Dist.) 2010, pet. filed) (cases applying a modified de novo standard of review). 2011See id . at 254; see also Garcia , 893 S.W.2d at 528 ; American Zurich Insurance Co. v. Samudio , 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex.App.--Houston (1st Dist.) 2010, pet. filed)(cases applying a modified de novo standard of review). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State Office of Risk Management v. Elaine E. Banks Joiner
green
1 sentence2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 State Office of Risk Management v. Joiner, 363 S.W.3d 242 (2012) Cases that cite this headnote [4] Workers' Compensation Medical impairment; impairment ratings Fact-finder in a workers' compensation case is required to adopt the specific impairment rating arrived at by one of the physicians who examined the claimant. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Peterson v. Continental Casualty Co.
green
1 sentence2005Peterson, 997 S.W.2d at 895 , citing Texas Workers’ Compensation Comm’n v. Garcia, 893 S.W.2d 504, 530 (Tex.1995). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.