24 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Curry v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See id. at 397 (noting objection); id. at 398–403 (reviewing amendment error). 2015See id. at 397 (noting objection); id. at 398–403 (reviewing amendment error). | 2 | 2 |
Almanza v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex. Crim. 2004Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 36.19 (Vernon 1981); see also Abdnor, 871 S.W.2d at 731-32 ; Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex.Crim.App.1984)(Opin. on reh’g). | 2 | 2 |
Webb v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See id. 2010See id. | 2 | 2 |
Arline v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Preserved error warrants reversal if appellant suffered “any harm, regardless of degree.” Id. (citing Arline v. State, 721 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)). 2007Preserved error warrants reversal if appellant suffered "any harm, regardless of degree." Id . (citing Arline v. State , 721 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Paynegreen2 sentences2006See State Dep’t of Highways & Public Transp. v. Payne, 838 S.W.2d 235, 241 (Tex.1992) (“There should be but one test for determining if a party has preserved error in the jury charge, and that is whether the party made the trial court aware of the complaint, timely and plainly, and obtained a ruling.”). 2006See State Dep't of Highways & Public Transp. v. Payne , 838 S.W.2d 235, 241 (Tex. 1992) ("There should be but one test for determining if a party has preserved error in the jury charge, and that is whether the party made the trial court aware of the complaint, timely and plainly, and obtained a ruling."). | 2 | 2 |
Vasquez v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Vasquez v. State, 389 S.W.3d 361, 363 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Austin v. Weemsgreen1 sentence2018See Austin v. Weems, 337 S.W.3d 415, 421 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (stating a preserved error may be waived by subsequent conduct). | 1 | 1 |
Abdnor v. Stategreen1 sentence2004Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 36.19 (Vernon 1981); see also Abdnor, 871 S.W.2d at 731-32 ; Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 171 (Tex.Crim.App.1984)(Opin. on reh’g). | 1 | 1 |
Nixon v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Id; see also Nixon v. State, 653 S.W.2d 443, 444 (Tex.Crim.App.1983) (overruled motion for mistrial preserved error). 1992Id; see also Nixon v. State, 653 S.W.2d 443, 444 (Tex.Crim.App. 1983) (overruled motion for mistrial preserved error). | 1 | 1 |
Moosavi v. Stategreen1 sentence1991See Hurd v. State, 725 S.W.2d 249, 253 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Moosavi v. State, 711 S.W.2d 53, 55 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Gutierrez v. State, 764 S.W.2d 796, 798 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Gutierrez v. Stategreen1 sentence1991See Hurd v. State, 725 S.W.2d 249, 253 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Moosavi v. State, 711 S.W.2d 53, 55 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Gutierrez v. State, 764 S.W.2d 796, 798 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Hurd v. Stategreen1 sentence1991See Hurd v. State, 725 S.W.2d 249, 253 (Tex.Crim.App.1987); Moosavi v. State, 711 S.W.2d 53, 55 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Gutierrez v. State, 764 S.W.2d 796, 798 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Richard Paul Spinner, IIIgreen2 sentences1999But see United States v. Spinner, 152 F.3d 950, 955-956 (D.C.Cir.l998)(expressing uncertainty concerning the difference between standard of review for a preserved claim versus an unpreserved claim). 1999But see United States v. Spinner, 152 F.3d 950, 955-956 (D.C.Cir.1998)(expressing uncertainty concerning the difference between standard of review for a preserved claim versus an unpreserved claim). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hutch v. State
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2007Preserved error warrants reversal if appellant suffered “any harm, regardless of degree.” Id. (citing Arline v. State, 721 S.W.2d 348, 351 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)). | 5 | 2006–2010 |
Rice v. State
green
2 sentences2011First, “the penalty for aggravated assault exceeds the penalty for reckless driving.” Id. at 908 . 2011First, "the penalty for aggravated assault exceeds the penalty for reckless driving." Id. at 908 . | 3 | 2011–2011 |
Thomas, Heather
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Employers Casualty Co. v. Block
green
1 sentence2015Id. admitted without reservation at the Appellants must also show they beginning of trial, and were in the preserved error to prevail on these jury room during deliberations. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.